TNRT profiles with the Nucleus Research Platform 8 system

References

• Battmer R.D., Dillier N., Lai W.K., Weber B.P., Brown C., et al. Evaluation of the neural response telemetry (NRT) capabilities of the Nucleus Research Platform 8: initial results from the NRT trial. Int J Audiol 2004; 43(Suppl. 1)S10–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown C.J., Hughes M.L., Luk B., Abbas P.J., Wolaver A., et al. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults. Ear Hear 2000; 21(2)151–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cafarelli Dees D., Dillier N., Lai W.K., von Wallenberg E., van Dijk B., et al. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10(2)105–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck K.H., Norton S.J. Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential with the Neurel Response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device. Ear Hear 2001; 22(4)289–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon K.A., Ebinger K.A., Gilden J.E., Shapiro W.H. Neural response telemetry in 12- to 24-month-old children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; 189(suppl)42–48
   Google Scholar
• Hughes M.L., Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Wolaver A.A., Gervais J.P. Comparison of EAP thresholds with map levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: Data from children. Ear Hear 2000; 21(2)164–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan-Neeman R., Henkin Y., Yakir Z., Bloch F., Berlin M., et al. NRT-based versus behavioral-based map: A comparison of parameters and speech perception in young children. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2004; 15(1–2)57–69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King J.E., Polak M., Hodges A.V., Payne S., Telischi F.F. Use of neural response telemetry measures to objectively set the levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant. J Am Acad Audiol 2006; 17(6)413–431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, W.K. 2004. An NRT Cookbook: Guidelines for making NRT measurements2nd Edition for Version 3.1. Cochlear, Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Mason S.M., Cope Y., Garnham J., O'Donoghue G.M., Gibbin K.P. Intra-operative recordings of electrically evoked auditory nerve action potentials in young children by use of neural response telemetry with the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Br J Audiol 2001; 35(4)225–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick J.F., Busby P.A., Gibson P.J. The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system. Trends Amplif 2006; 10(4)175–200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pedley K., Psarros C., Gardner-Berry K., Parker A., Purdy S.C., et al. Evaluation of NRT and behavioral measures for MAPping elederly cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 2007; 46(5)254–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts L.G., Skinner M.W., Gotter B.D., Strube M.J., Brenner C.A. Relationship between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-Levels, and loudness judgements in 12 adult Nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hear 2007; 28(4)495–511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G.F., Willeboer C., van Dijk J.E. Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiol Neurootol 2002; 7(6)335–247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg, G.F. 2007. T- and C-level profiles across the electrode array: Fitting the speech processor by profile parameter adjustment. Chapter 2, Cochlear Implant Ear Marks. University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Willeboer C., Smoorenburg G.F. Comparing cochlear implant users' speech performance with processor fittings based on conventionally determined T and C levels or on compound action potential thresholds and live-voice speech in a prospective balanced crossover study. Ear Hear 2006; 27(6)789–798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar