Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: Clinical outcomes

References

• Auriemmo J., Kuk F., Stenger P. Criteria for evaluating the performance of linear frequency transposition in children. Hear J 2008; 61: 50–54
   Google Scholar
• Bagatto M., Moodie S., Scollie S., Seewald R., Moodie S.K., et al. Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the desired sensation level method. Trends in Amplif 2005; 9(4)199–226
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beasley D., Mosher N., Orchik D. Use of frequency-shifted/time-compressed speech with hearing-impaired children. Audiology 1976; 15: 395–406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett D., Byers V. Increased intelligibility in the hypacusis by slow-play frequency transposition. J Aud Res 1967; 7: 107–118
   Google Scholar
• Bentler R.A., Niebuhr D.P., Johnson T.A., Flamme G.A. Impact of digital labeling on outcome measures. Ear Hear 2003; 24(3)215–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A., Medwetsky L. Spectral distribution of /s/ and the frequency response of hearing aids. Ear Hear 1992; 13(3)150–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheesman M.F., Jamieson D. G. Development, evaluation, and scoring of a nonsense word test suitable for use with speakers of Canadian English. Canadian Acoustics 1996; 24(1)3–11
   Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y., Dillon H., Byrne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103(2)1128–1140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y., Dillon H., Katsch R., Byrne D. Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear 2001; 22(3)212–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandell C.C., Smaldino J.J. Classroom acoustics for children with normal hearing and with hearing impairment. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2000; 31: 362–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Naylor G., Elderling C. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings: 1. Patterns of benefit. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 130–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Naylor G., Elderling C. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings: 2. Patterns of candidature. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 153–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: Evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92(3)1258–1269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks C.B., Tharpe A.M. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 2002; 45: 573–584
   Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand J., Getty L.A., Clark M.J., Wheeler K. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97(5)1–13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan C.A., Turner C.W. High-frequency audibility: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104(1)432–441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz A.R., Turner C.W. The time course of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1997; 18(1)1–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E., Christopherson L. Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: The contributions of auditory processing deficits. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 686–693
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes L.E., Watson B.U., Christersen L.A., Cokely C.G., Halling D.C., et al. Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. J Speech Hear Res 1994; 37: 465–474
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson, B. 1961. A new coding amplifier system for the severely hard of hearing. In:. L. Cremer. Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Acoustics, 2, 655–657.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson B. The use of the transposer for the management of the deaf child. International Audiology 1966; V(3)362–372
   Google Scholar
• Kuk F., Korhonen P., Peeters H., Keenen D., Jessen A., et al. Linear frequency transposition: Extending the audibility of high-frequency energy. Hear Rev 2006; 13: 10
   Google Scholar
• Kuk, F., Potts, L., Valente, M., Lee, L. & Picirrillo, J. 2003. Evidence of acclimatization in persons with severe-to-profound hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol, 14(2)
   Google Scholar
• D Ling, 1989. Foundations of Spoken Language for Hearing-impaired Children. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ling D., Druz W.S. Transposition of high frequency sounds by partial vocoding of the speech spectrum: Its use by deaf children. J Aud Res 1967; 7: 133–144
   Google Scholar
• MacArdle B.M., West C., Bradley J., Worth S., Mackenzie J., et al. A study of the application of a frequency transposition hearing system in children. Br J Audiol 2001; 35: 17–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie C.L., Crocker T.L., Davis R. Limiting high-frequency hearing aid gain in listeners with and without suspected cochlear dead regions. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15: 498–507
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDermott H.J., Knight M.R. Preliminary results with the AVR ImpaCt frequency-transposing hearing aid. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12(3)121–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller-Hansen D.R., Nelson P.G., Widen J.E., Simon S.D. Evaluating the benefit of speech recoding hearing aids in children. Am J Audiol 2003; 12: 106–113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moeller M.P., Hoover B., Putman C., Arbataitis K., Bohnenkamp G., et al. Vocalizations of infants with hearing loss compared with infants with normal hearing: Part I. Phonetic development. Ear Hear 2007; 28(5)605–627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. New version of the TEN test with calibration in dB HL. Ear Hear 2004; 25(5)478–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro K.J., Lutman M.E. The effect of speech presentation level on measurement of auditory acclimatization to amplified speech. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114(1)484–495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman R.S. Using links between speech perception and speech production to evaluate different acoustic metrics: A preliminary report. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113(5)2850–2860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen W.O. Average speech levels and spectra in various speaking/listening conditions: A summary of the Pearson, Bennett, & Fidell (1977) report. Am J Audiol 1998; 7: 1–5
   Google Scholar
• Parent T.C., Chmiel R., Jerger J. Comparison of performance with frequency transposition hearing aids and conventional hearing aids. Am J Audiol 1997; 8(5)355–365
   Google Scholar
• Pittman A.L. Short-term word-learning rate in children with normal hearing and children with hearing loss in limited and extended high-frequency bandwidths. J Speech Hear Res 2008; 51(3)785–797
   Google Scholar
• Pittman A.L., Stelmachowicz P.G. Perception of voiceless fricatives by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children and adults. J Speech Hear Res 2000; 43: 1389–1401
   Google Scholar
• Pittman A.L., Stelmachowicz P.G., Lewis D.E., Hoover B.M. Spectral characteristics of speech at the ear: Implications for amplification in children. J Speech Hear Res 2003; 46(3)649–657
   Google Scholar
• Plyler P.N., Fleck E.L. The effects of high-frequency amplification on the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users with varying degrees of high-frequency hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 2006; 49(3)616–627
   Google Scholar
• L.G Portney. & Watkins, M.P. 2000. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Health.
   Google Scholar
• Raffin M.J., Thornton A.R. Confidence levels for differences between speech-discrimination scores: A research note. J Speech Hear Res 1980; 23(1)5–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson J., Baer T., Moore B.C.J. Using transposition to improve consonant discrimination and detection for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2007; 46: 293–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie S., Seewald R., Cornelisse L., Moodie S., Bagatto M.P., et al. The desired sensation level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends in Amplif 2005; 9(4)159–197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson A., Hersbach A.A., McDermott H.J. Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency compression hearing device. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 281–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson A., Hersbach A.A., McDermott H.J. Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 619–629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Pittman A.L., Hoover B.M., Lewis D.E. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal and hearing-impaired children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110(4)2183–2190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Pittman A.L., Hoover B.M., Lewis D.E. Aided perception of /s/ and /z/ by hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear 2002; 23(4)316–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Pittman A.L., Hoover B.M., Lewis D.E., Moeller M.P. The importance of high-frequency audibility in the speech and language development of children with hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130(5)556–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker G.A., McDaniel D.M., Sherbecoe R.L. Evaluating relative speech recognition performance using proficiency factor and rationalized arcsine differences. J Am Acad Audiol 1995; 6(2)173–182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tenhaaf, J.J. & Scollie, S.D. 2005. Normative threshold levels for a calibrated, computer-assisted version of the Ling six-sound test. Canadian Acoustics.
   Google Scholar
• Turner C.W., Henry B. Benefits of amplification for speech recognition in background noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 1675–1680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C.W., Hurtig R.R. Proportional frequency compression of speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 106(2)877–886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers D.A., Moore B.C., Baer T. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110(2)1164–1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar