Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients

References

• Ciocca V., Vandali A.E., Wong L., Luk B., Ip V.W.-K., et al. 2005. Pitch Perception by Cochlear Implant Users. Oral presentation, Fifth Asia Pacific Symposium on Cochlear Implant and Related Sciences, Hong Kong, 26-28 Nov.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson P.W., Hersbach A.A. & Swanson B.A. 2013. An adaptive Australian Sentence Test in Noise (AuSTIN). Ear Hear, 34(5), 592–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francart T., Osses A. & Wouters J. 2015. Speech perception with F0mod, a cochlear implant pitch coding strategy. Int J Audiol, 54(6), 424–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster D.H. & Bischof W.F. 1991. Thresholds from psychometric functions: Superiority of bootstrap to incremental and probit variance estimators. Psychol Bull, 109, 152–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Q-J., Hsu, C-J. & Horng, M-J. 2004. Effects of speech processing strategy on Chinese tone recognition by Nucleus-24 cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 25, 501–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandour J. 1981. Perceptual dimensions of tones: Evidence from Cantonese. J Chinese Linguist, 9, 20–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts L. & Wouters J. 2001. Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 109(2), 713–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K.E., Tuner C., Oleson J., Zhang X., Gantz B., et al. 2007. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear Hear, 28, 412–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green T., Faulkner A. & Rosen S. 2004. Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 2298–2310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green T., Faulkner A., Rosen S. & Macherey O. 2005. Enhancement of temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implants: Effects on prosodic perception and vowel identification. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 375–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James C.J., Blamey P.J., Martin L., Swanson B. & Just Y. 2002. Adaptive dynamic range optimization for cochlear implants: A preliminary study. Ear Hear, 23, 49SY58S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laneau J. (2005). When the Deaf Listen to Music–Pitch Perception with Cochlear Implants. PhD thesis, University of Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Laneau J., Wouters J. & Moonen M. 2006. Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol, 11, 38–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal M.C., Shin Y.J., Laborde M.L., Calmels M.N., Verges S., et al. 2003. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol, 123, 826–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Z.A. 1963. Tonal discrimination of Mandarin Chinese. Acta Physiologica Sinica, 26, 85–91.
   Google Scholar
• Lou X., Galvin J.J. & Fu Q.J. 2010. Effects of stimulus duration on amplitude modulation processing with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, EL23–EL29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan N.A. & Creelman C.D. 1991. Detection Theory: A User's Guide, New York: Cambridge University Press, 3–136.
   Google Scholar
• McKay C.M., McDermott H.J. & Clark G.M. 1994. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2664–2673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay C.M. & McDermott H.J. 1996. The perception of temporal patterns for electrical stimulation presented at one or two intracochlear sites. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 1081–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milczynski M., Wouters J. & van Wieringen A. 2009. Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 2260–2271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milczynski M., Chang J.,E., Wouters J. & van Wieringen A. 2012. Perception of Mandarin Chinese with cochlear implants using enhanced temporal pitch cues. Hear Res, 285, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. & Peters R.W. 1985. Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 77, 1853–1860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C. & Carlyon R.P. 2005. Perception of pitch by people with cochlear hearing loss and by cochlear implant users, In C. J. Plack and A. J. Oxenham (eds.), Handbook of Auditory Research: Pitch Perception, New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M., Soli S.D. & Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijl S. 1997. Pulse rate matching by cochlear implant patients: Effects of loudness randomization and electrode position. Ear Hear, 18, 316–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sucher C.M. & McDermott H.J. 2007. Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users. Hear Res, 230, 80–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A.R. & Raffin M.J. 1978. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res, 21(3), 507–518.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vandali A.E. 2013. Optimisation of rate-pitch perception in cochlear implant hearing. PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne, Available: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/39956
   Google Scholar
• Vandali A.E., Whitford L.A., Plant K.L. & Clark G.M. 2000. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: Using the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear, 21, 608–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandali A.E., Sucher C., Tsang D.J., McKay C.M., Chew J.W.D., et al. 2005. Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: A comparison of sound-processing strategies. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 3126–3138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandali A.E. & van Hoesel R.J.M. 2011. Development of a temporal fundamental frequency coding strategy for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 129, 4023–4036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandali A.E. & van Hoesel R.J.M. 2012. Enhancement of temporal cues to pitch in cochlear implants: Effects on pitch ranking. J Acoust Soc Am, 132, 392–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandali A., Sly D., Cowan R. & van Hoesel R. 2015. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues. Ear Hear, 36(2), e1–e13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W., Zhou N. & Xu L. 2011. Musical pitch and lexical tone perception with cochlear implants. Int J Audiol, 50, 270–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei C.G., Cao K. & Zeng F.G. 2004. Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant subjects. Hear Res, 197, 87–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei C.G., Cao K., Jin X., Chen X. & Zeng F.G. 2007. Psychophysical performance and Mandarin tone recognition in noise by cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 28, 62S–65S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White L.J. & Plack C.J. 1998. Temporal processing of the pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 2051–2063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B.S., Finley C.C., Lawson D.T., Wolford R.D., Eddington D.K., et al. 1991. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature, 352, 236–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong L. & Soli S. 2005. Development of the Cantonese hearing in noise test (CHINT). Ear Hear, 26, 276–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong L.L.N., Vandali A.E., Ciocca V., Luk B., Ip V.W.K., et al. 2008. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers. Int J Audiol, 47(6), 337–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi X., Ching T.Y.C., Ji F., Zhao Y., Li J.N., et al. 2012. Development of a corpus of Mandarin sentences in babble with homogeneity optimised via psychometric evaluation. Intern J Aud, 51, 399–404.
   Google Scholar
• Xu L. & Zhou N. 2011. Tonal languages and cochlear implants, in Auditory Prosthesis: New Horizons, F. G. Zeng., et al., eds. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng F.G. 2002. Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hear Res, 174, 101–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar