http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7241-2037
References
- Breithaupt, C., Gerkmann, T. & Martin, R. 2008. A novel a priori SNR estimation approach based on selective cepstro-temporal smoothing. Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing; Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Byrne, D. & Dillon, H. 1986. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear, 7, 257–265.
- Gerkmann, T. & Hendriks, R.C. 2012. Unbiased MMSE-based noise power estimation with low complexity and low tracking delay. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Language Process, 20, 1383–1393.
- Gerkmann, T. & Martin, R. 2009. On the statistics of spectral amplitudes after variance reduction by temporal cepstrum smoothing and cepstral nulling. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 57, 4165–4174.
- Haque, S., Togner, R. & Nordholm, S. 2013. A psychoacoustic noise reduction method by auditory inhibition. Int J Signal Process Syst, 1, 196–201.
- Hu, Y. & Loizou, P. 2007a. A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 1777.
- Hu, Y. & Loizou, P. 2007b. Subjective evaluation and comparison of speech enhancement algorithms. Speech Commun, 49, 588–601.
- Huber, R. & Kollmeier, B. 2006. PEMO-Q – a new method for objective audio quality assessment using a model of auditory perception. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Language Process, 14, 1902–1911.
- Itakura, F. 1975. Minimum prediction residual principle applied to speech recognition. IEEE Trans Acoust, 23, 67–72.
- ITU-T. 2001. Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), an objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrow-band telephone networks and speech codecs. ITU-T Recommendation P.862, International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland.
- ITU-R. 2003. Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality levels of coding systems. ITU-R Recommendation BS.1534, International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland.
- Kitawaki, N., Nagabuchi, H. & Itoh, K. 1988. Objective quality evaluation for low-bit-rate speech coding systems. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 6, 242–248.
- Lee, Y.W. & Kim, I.Y. 2010. Sound quality evaluation of a speech enhancement algorithm for hearing impaired listeners. Proc. of the 38th International Audio Engineering Society Conference: Sound Quality Evaluation.
- Li, J., Yang, L., Zhang, J., Yan, Y., Hu, Y., et al. 2011. Comparative intelligibility investigation of single-channel noise-reduction algorithms for Chinese, Japanese, and English. J Acoust Soc Am, 129, 3291–3301.
- Luts, H., Eneman, K., Wouters, J., Vormann, M., Büchler, M., et al. 2010. Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 1491–1505.
- Marzinzik, M. & Kollmeier, B. 2003. Predicting the subjective quality of noise reduction algorithms for hearing aids. Acta Acustica United Acustica, 89, 521–529.
- Sharma, P., Singh, S., Tripathy, M. & Anand, R.S. 2014. Comparative evaluation single channel speech enhancement algorithms with and without phase spectrum compensation. Int J Inform Comput Technol, 4, 1791–1797.
- Yu-yong, J. & Sang-min, L. 2011. A speech enhancement algorithm to reduce noise and compensate for partial masking effect. J Cent South Univ Technol, 18, 1121–1127.