An individualised acoustically transparent earpiece for hearing devices

References

• Borges, R.C., Costa, M.H., Cordioli, J. & Assuiti, L.F. 2013. An adaptive occlusion canceller for hearing aids. Proceedings of the 21st European Signal Processing Conference; Marrakech, Morocco.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D. 1982. High-resolution subjective testing using a double-blind comparator. J Audio Eng Soc, 30, 330–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina, A. 2000. Simultaneous measurement of impulse response and distortion with a swept-sine technique. Proc Aud Eng Soc Conv, 108, 5093–5094.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, G., Herzke, T., Berg, D. & Hohmann, V. 2006. The master hearing aid: A PC-based platform for algorithm development and evaluation. Acta Acust United Acust, 92, 618–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth, J. & Søndergaard, M.B. 2004. Disturbance caused by varying propagation delay in non-occluding hearing aid fittings. Int J Audiol, 43, 594–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammershøi, D. & Møller, H. 1996. Sound transmission to and within the human ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 408–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Härmä, A., Jakka, J., Tikander, M., Karjalainen, M., Lokki, T., et al. 2004. Augmented reality audio for mobile and wearable appliances. J Audio Eng Soc, 52, 618–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiipakka, M., Kinnari, T. & Pulkki, V. 2012. Estimating head-related transfer functions of human subjects from pressure-velocity measurements. J Acoust Soc Am, 131, 4051–4061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiipakka, M., Tikander, M. & Karjalainen, M. 2010. Modeling the external ear acoustics for insert headphone usage. J Audio Eng Soc, 58, 269–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, P.F., Christensen, F. & Hammershøi, D. 2013. Insert earphone calibration for hear-through options. 51st International Conference: Loudspeakers and Headphones; Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, P.F., Møller, A.K., Christensen, F. & Hammershøi, D. 2014. Sound localization and speech identification in the frontal median plane with a hear-through headset. Proceedings of Forum Acusticum; Krakow, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 13813-1:2013, I., 2013. Information technology – generic coding of moving mixtures and associated audio information: Systems - Part 1. International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Killion, M.C. 1988. An “acoustically invisible” hearing aid. Hear Instr, 39, 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Killion, M.C. 2004. Myths that discourage improvements in hearing aid design. Hear Rev, 11, 32–70.
   Google Scholar
• Killion, M.C., Monroe, T. & Drambarean, V. 2011. Better protection from blasts without sacrificing situational awareness. Int J Audiol, 50, 38–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A., Jin, C. & Schaik, A.V. 2009. Psychoacoustic evaluation of systems for delivering spatialized augmented-reality audio. J Audio Eng Soc, 57, 1016–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, K. & Voix, J. 2013. Implementing 24-hour in-ear dosimetry with recovery. Proc Meet Acoust, 19, 040016.
   Google Scholar
• Mejia, J., Dillon, H. & Fisher, M. 2008. Active cancellation of occlusion: An electronic vent for hearing aids and hearing protectors. J Acoust Soc Am, 124, 235–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller, A.K., Christensen, F., Hoffmann, P.F. & Hammershøi, D. 2015. Directional characteristics for different in-ear recording points. 58th International Conference: Music Induced Hearing Disorders; Aalborg, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, H.G. 2006. Opens is in. Hear J, 59, 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rämö, J. & Välimäki, V. 2012. Digital augmented reality audio headset. J Electr Comp Eng, 2012, Article ID: 457374.
   Google Scholar
• Rasumow, E., Blau, M., Hansen, M., van de Par, S., Doclo, S., et al. 2014. Smoothing individual head-related transfer functions in the frequency and spatial domains. J Acoust Soc Am, 135, 2012–2025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankowsky-Rothe, T., Blau, M., Köhler, S. & Stirnemann, A. 2015. Individual equalization of hearing aids with integrated ear canal microphones. Acta Acust United Acus, 101, 552–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepker, H. & Doclo, S. 2016. A semidefinite programming approach to min-max estimation of the common part of acoustic feedback paths in hearing aids. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process, 24, 366–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepker, H., Tran, L., Nordholm, S. & Doclo, S. 2017. Null-steering beamformer for acoustic feedback cancellation in a multi-microphone earpiece optimizing the maximum stable gain. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing; New Orleans, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Schönwiesner, M., Voix, J. & Pango, P. 2009. Digital earplug for brain plasticity research. Can Acoust, 37, 94–95.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M., Moore, B., Meisenbacher, K. & Derleth, R. 2008. Tolerable hearing aid delays. V. Estimation of limits for open canal fittings. Ear Hear, 29,601–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiemann, J., Escher, A. & van de Par, S. 2015. Multiple model high-spatial resolution HRTF measurements. Fortschritte der Akustik – DAGA; Nuremberg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Vogl, S., Sankowsky-Rothe, T. & Blau, M. 2016. Electro-acoustic modelling of an earpiece with integrated microphones and loudspeakers. (In German) Fortschritte der Akustik – DAGA; Aachen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, A., Latzel, M. & Holube, I. 2016. Open versus closed hearing-aid fittings: A literature review of both fitting approaches. Trends Hear, 20, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, B. 2013. Head-related transfer function and virtual auditory display. Plantation, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
   Google Scholar