Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression

References

• Brand, T., and V. Hohmann. 2002. “An Adaptive Procedure for Categorical Loudness Scaling.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112 (4): 1597–1604. doi:10.1121/1.1502902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst, A. W. 2000. “The Cocktail Party Phenomenon: A Review of Research on Speech Intelligibility in Multiple-Talker Conditions.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 86: 117–128.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., and W. Noble. 1998. “Optimizing Sound Localization with Hearing Aids.” Trends in Amplification 3 (2): 51–73. doi:10.1177/108471389800300202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byrne, D., H. Dillon, T. Ching, R. Katsch, and G. Keidser. 2001. “NAL-NL1 Procedure for Fitting Nonlinear Hearing Aids: Characteristics and Comparisons with Other Procedures.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 12 (1): 37–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherry, E. C. 1953. “Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25 (5): 975–979. doi:10.1121/1.1907229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, N. R., G. J. Brown, T. Jürgens, and R. Meddis. 2012. “A frequency-selective feedback model of auditory efferent suppression and its implications for the recognition of speech in noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132 (3): 1535–1541. doi:10.1121/1.4742745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, N. R., W. Lecluyse, and T. Jürgens. 2016. “Analysis of Compressive Properties of the BioAid Hearing Aid Algorithm.” International Journal of Audiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1378931.
   Google Scholar
• Ellermeier, W., M. Mader, and P. Daniel. 2004. “Scaling the Unpleasantness of Sounds According to the BTL-Model: Ratio-Scale Representation and Psychoacoustical Analysis.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 90: 101–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, S. M., and B. C. J. Moore. 2012. “The Role of Time and Place Cues in the Detection of Frequency Modulation by Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131 (6): 4722–4731. doi:10.1121/1.3699233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, G., T. Herzke, D. Berg, and V. Hohmann. 2006. “The Master Hearing Aid: A PC-Based Platform for Algorithm Development and Evaluation.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 92: 618–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, G., B. Kollmeier, and V. Hohmann. 2016. “Spatial Acoustic Scenarios in Multichannel Loudspeaker Systems for Hearing Aid Evaluation.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27 (7): 557–566. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. B. 2008. “Epoq Study Measures User Benefits.” Hearing Journal 61 (9): 47–49. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000339507.82549.03.
   Google Scholar
• Hohmann, V. 2002. “Frequency Analysis and Synthesis Using a Gammatone Filterbank.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 88: 433–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holube, I., S. Fredelake, M. Vlaming, and B. Kollmeier. 2010. “Development and Analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS).” International Journal of Audiology 49: 891–903. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.506889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 1987. Acoustics—Normal Equal-Loudness Level Contours. ISO-226-1987, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission. 2012. Electroacoustics – Hearing Aids – Part 15: Methods for Characterising Signal Processing in Hearing Aids with a Speech-Like Signal. IEC 60118-15.
   Google Scholar
• Jürgens, T., N. R. Clark, W. Lecluyse, and R. Meddis. 2016. “Exploration of a Physiologically-Inspired Hearing-Aid Algorithm Using a Computer Model Mimicking Impaired Hearing.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (6): 346–357. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1135352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kates, J. M. 2008. Digital Hearing Aids. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing, Chap. 13, 406–416.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., K. Rohrseitz, H. Dillon, V. Hamacher, L. Carter, U. Rass, and E. Convery. 2006. “The Effect of Multi-Channel Wide Dynamic Range Compression, Noise Reduction, and the Directional Microphone on Horizontal Localization Performance in Hearing Aid Wearers.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (10): 563–579. doi:10.1080/14992020600920804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, G. Jr., C. R. Mason, V. M. Richards, F. J. Gallun, and N. I. Durlach. 2008. “Informational masking.” In Auditory Perception of Sound Sources, edited by W. A. Yost, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay. New York: Springer, 143–190, Chap. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Kortlang, S., G. Grimm, V. Hohmann, B. Kollmeier, and S. D. Ewert. 2016. “Auditory Model-Based Dynamic Compression Controlled by Subband Instantaneous Frequency and Speech Presence Probability Estimates.” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 24 (10): 1759–1772. doi:10.1109/TASLP.2016.2584705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreisman, B. M., A. G. Mazevski, D. J. Schum, and R. Sockalingam. 2010. “Improvements in Speech Understanding with Wireless Binaural Broadband Digital Hearing Instruments in Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.” Trends in Amplification 14 (1): 3–11. doi:10.1177/1084713810364396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lecluyse, W., N. R. Clark, T. Jürgens, and R. Meddis. 2012. “Regulation of Loudness Using a New Hearing Aid Algorithm.” Poster presentation at the British Society of Audiology 3rd Annual Conference and Experimental and Short paper meeting, Nottingham (UK), September.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Poveda, E. A., and R. Meddis. 2001. “A Human Nonlinear Cochlear Filterbank.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110 (6): 3107–3118. doi:10.1121/1.1416197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meddis, R., N. R. Clark, W. Lecluyse, and T. Jürgens. 2013. “BioAid – Ein Biologisch Inspiriertes Hörgerät. (BioAid – a Biologically Inspired Hearing Aid).” Zeitschrift für Audiologie – Audiological Acoustics 52: 148–152.
   Google Scholar
• Middlebrooks, J. C., and D. M. Green. 1991. “Sound Localization by Human Listeners.” Annual Review of Psychology 42: 135–159. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.001031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. C. J. 2008. “The Choice of Compression Speed in Hearing Aids: Theoretical and Practical Considerations and the Role of Individual Differences.” Trends in Amplification 12 (2): 103–112. doi:10.1177/1084713808317819.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musa-Shufani, S., M. Walger, H. von Wedel, and H. Meister. 2006. “Influence of Dynamic Compression on Directional Hearing in the Horizontal Plane.” Ear and Hearing 27 (3): 279–285. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000215972.68797.5e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sockalingam, R., M. Holmberg, K. Eneroth, and M. Shulte. 2009. “Binaural Hearing Aid Communication Shown to Improve Sound Quality and Localization.” Hearing Journal 62 (10): 46–47. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000361850.27208.35.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. A., and B. C. J. Moore. 1999. “Tolerable Hearing Aid Delays. I. Estimation of Limits Imposed by the Auditory Path Alone Using Simulated Hearing Losses.” Ear and Hearing 20 (3): 182–192. doi:10.1097/00003446-199906000-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests Für Die Deutsche Sprache (Development and Evaluation of a Sentence Test for the German Language). I–III: Design, Optimierung Und Evaluation Des Oldenburger Satztests.” Zeitschrift für Audiologie – Audiological Acoustics 38: 4–15. 44–56, 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, I. M., and B. U. Seeber. 2011. “Dynamic-Range Compression Affects the Lateral Position of Sounds.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130 (6): 3939–3953. doi:10.1121/1.3652887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, I. M., and B. U. Seeber. 2012. “Effects of Dynamic-Range Compression on the Spatial Attributes of Sounds in Normal-Hearing Listeners.” Ear and Hearing 33 (3): 399–410. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31823d78fd.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, I. M., and B. U. Seeber. 2013. “Linking Dynamic-Range Compression across the Ears Can Improve Speech Intelligibility in Spatially Separated Noise.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (2): 1004–1016. doi:10.1121/1.4773862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar