Input-related demands: vocoded sentences evoke different pupillometrics and subjective listening effort than sentences in speech-shaped noise

References

• Alhanbali, S., P. Dawes, R. E. Millman, and K. J. Munro. 2019. “Measures of Listening Effort Are Multidimensional.” Ear and Hearing 40 (5): 1084–1097. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhanbali, S., K. J. Munro, P. Dawes, P. J. Carolan, and R. E. Millman. 2021. “Dimensions of Self-reported Listening Effort and Fatigue on a Digits-in-Noise Task, and Association with Baseline Pupil Size and Performance Accuracy.” International Journal of Audiology 60 (10): 762–772. doi:10.1080/14992027.2020.1853262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aston-Jones, G., and J. D. Cohen. 2005. “An Integrative Theory of Locus Coeruleus-norepinephrine Function: Adaptive Gain and Optimal Performance.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 28: 403–450. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, L., T. S. Ala, C. Graversen, E. Alickovic, T. Lunner, and D. Wendt. 2021. “Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Lowers the Sustained Listening Effort During Continuous Speech in Noise—A Combined Pupillometry and EEG Study.” Ear and Hearing 42 (6):1590–1601. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000001050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, A. L., T. Bent, J. Schumaker, J. Love, and N. Silbert. 2021. “Listener Characteristics Differentially Affect Self-reported and Physiological Measures of Effort Associated with Two Challenging Listening Conditions.” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 83 (4): 1818–1841. doi:10.3758/s13414-020-02195-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilzenrat, M. S., S. Nieuwenhuis, M. Jepma, and J. D. Cohen. 2010. “Pupil Diameter Tracks Changes in Control State Predicted by the Adaptive Gain Theory of Locus Coeruleus Function.” Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 10 (2): 252–269. doi:10.3758/CABN.10.2.252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, N. P., C. J. Brown, and Y. H. Wu. 2020. “Comparisons of the Sensitivity and Reliability of Multiple Measures of Listening Effort.” Ear and Hearing. 42 (2): 465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 1969. “IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements.” IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics 17 (3): 225–246. doi:10.1109/TAU.1969.1162058
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and Effort. Hoboken: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., B. Tursky, D. Shapiro, and A. Crider. 1969. “Pupillary, Heart Rate, and Skin Resistance Changes during a Mental Task.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1): 164–167. doi:10.1037/h0026952
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kramer, S. E., A. Lorens, F. Coninx, A. A. Zekveld, A. Piotrowska, and H. Skarzynski. 2013. “Processing Load during Listening: The Influence of Task Characteristics on the Pupil Response.” Language and Cognitive Processes 28 (4): 426–442. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.642267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., C. Rodenkirch, N. Moskowitz, B. Schriver, and Q. Wang. 2017. “Dynamic Lateralization of Pupil Dilation Evoked by Locus Coeruleus Activation Results from Sympathetic, Not Parasympathetic.” Contributions. Cell Reports 20 (13): 3099–3112. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie, C. L., and N. Calderon-Moultrie. 2016. “Autonomic Nervous System Reactivity during Speech Repetition Tasks: Heart Rate Variability and Skin Conductance.” Ear & Hearing 37 (1): 118S–125S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., M. H. Davis, A. R. Bradlow, and S. K. Scott. 2012. “Speech Recognition in Adverse Conditions: A Review.” Language and Cognitive Processes 27 (7-8): 953–978. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.705006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarrigle, R., P. Dawes, A. J. Stewart, S. E. Kuchinsky, and K. J. Munro. 2017. “Pupillometry Reveals Changes in Physiological Arousal during a Sustained Listening Task.” Psychophysiology 54 (2): 193–203. doi:10.1111/psyp.12772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, D. J., and K. J. Van Engen. 2020. “Task-evoked Pupil Response for Accurately Recognized Accented Speech.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147 (2): EL151–EL156. doi:10.1121/10.0000718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, C. M., I. Boisvert, P. de Lissa, L. Granger, R. Ibrahim, C. Y. Lo, K. Miles, and P. L. Graham. 2016. “Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-intensity Function.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 745. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T. M., and E. M. Picou. 2018. “A Potential Bias in Subjective Ratings of Mental effort.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR 61 (9): 2405–2421. doi:10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E. 2018. “Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior.” Ear and Hearing 39 (2): 204–214. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K., S. E. Kramer, M. A. Eckert, B. Edwards, B. W. Hornsby, L. E. Humes, U. Lemke, et al. 2016. “Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).” Ear & Hearing 37 (1): 5S–27S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajkowski, J., P. Kubiak, and G. Aston-Jones. 1994. “Locus Coeruleus Activity in Monkey: Phasic and Tonic Changes Are Associated with Altered Vigilance.” Brain Research Bulletin 35 (5-6): 607–616. doi:10.1016/0361-9230(94)90175-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., E. Holmer, and M. Rudner. 2019. “Cognitive Hearing Science and Ease of Language Understanding.” International Journal of Audiology 58 (5): 247–261. doi:10.1080/14992027.2018.1551631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, S. R., G. J. Siegle, R. Condray, and M. Pless. 2004. “Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Innervation of Pupillary Dilation during Sustained Processing.” International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology 52 (1): 77–86. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, J. F., V. A. Brown, M. B. Merchant, H. E. Brown, and J. Smith. 2018. “Measuring Listening Effort: Convergent Validity, Sensitivity, and Links with Cognitive and Personality Measures.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR 61 (6): 1463–1486. doi:10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G. A. 1985. “A "Rationalized" Arcsine Transform.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28 (3):455–462. doi:10.1044/jshr.2803.455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, Y., G. Naylor, S. E. Kramer, A. A. Zekveld, D. Wendt, B. Ohlenforst, and T. Lunner. 2018. “Relations between Self-reported Daily-life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation during a Speech Perception in Noise Task.” Ear and Hearing 39 (3): 573–582. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, D., R. K. Hietkamp, and T. Lunner. 2017. “Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study.” Ear and Hearing 38 (6):690–700. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. B., J. R. Edwards, and R. Y. Litovsky. 2015. “The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation.” Ear and Hearing 36 (4): e153–e165. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. B, and K. H. Teece. 2022. “Effortful Listening Despite Correct Responses: The Cost of Mental Repair in Sentence Recognition by Listeners with Cochlear Implants.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 65 (10): 3966–3980..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. B., D. Wendt, T. Koelewijn, and S. E. Kuchinsky. 2018. “Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started.” Trends in Hearing 22: 2331216518800869. doi:10.1177/2331216518800869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. H., E. Stangl, X. Zhang, J. Perkins, and E. Eilers. 2016. “Psychometric Functions of Dual-task Paradigms for Measuring Listening Effort.” Ear and Hearing 37 (6): 660–670. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., D. J. Heslenfeld, I. S. Johnsrude, N. J. Versfeld, and S. E. Kramer. 2014. “The Eye as a Window to the Listening Brain: Neural Correlates of Pupil Size as a Measure of Cognitive Listening Load.” NeuroImage 101: 76–86. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., T. Koelewijn, and S. E. Kramer. 2018. “The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.” Trends in Hearing 22: 2331216518777174. doi:10.1177/2331216518777174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., S. E. Kramer, and J. M. Festen. 2010. “Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility.” Ear and Hearing 31 (4): 480–490. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d4f251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar