Intention to Participate in Social Activism Activities in Response to Corporate Social Advocacy: A Third-Person Effect Perspective

References

• Ahler, D. J. (2014). Self-fulfilling misperceptions of public polarization. The Journal of Politics, 76(3), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381614000085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, L., Gaither, B., & Gaither, T. K. (2019). Corporate social advocacy as public interest communications: Exploring perceptions of corporate involvement in controversial social-political issues. Journal of Public Interest Communications, 3(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v3.i2.p3
   Google Scholar
• Banning, S. A., & Sweetser, K. D. (2007). How much do they think it affects them and whom do they believe? Comparing the third-person effect and credibility of blogs and traditional media. Communication Quarterly, 55(4), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370701665114
   Google Scholar
• Barnidge, M., Sayre, B., & Rojas, H. (2015). Perceptions of the media and the public and their effects on political participation in Colombia. Mass Communication and Society, 18(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.923463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, J. (2018, March 1). There’s a simple reason companies are becoming more publicly left-wing on social issues. Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/why-companies-ditching-nra-delta-selling-guns-2018-2
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4(4), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1986.4.4.353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H., & Boster, F. J. (2005). Development and validation of value-, outcome-, and impression-relevant involvement scales. Communication Research, 32(2), 235–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204273764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. K., & Wegener, D. T. (2013). Message position, information processing, and persuasion: The discrepancy motives model. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 189–232). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. K., Wegener, D. T., Habashi, M. M., & Evans, A. T. (2012). Source expertise and persuasion: The effects of perceived opposition or support on message scrutiny. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211420733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1086/268763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delistavrou, A., Krystallis, A., & Tilikidou, I. (2020). Consumers’ decision to boycott “unethical” products: The role of materialism/post materialism. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(10), 1121–1138. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-04-2019-0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, M. (2018). Globalization, pluralization, and erosion: The impact of shifting societal expectations for advocacy and public good. Journal of Public Interest Communications, 2(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v2.i2.p221
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, M. D., & Supa, D. W. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring “corporate social advocacy” communication: Examining the impact on corporate financial performance. The Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 2–23.
   Google Scholar
• Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, J. M., Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (1995). Me, us and them: Political identification and the third‐person effect in the 1993 Australian federal election. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, J. M., & Mullin, B. A. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, M. F., & Newman, A. J. (2010). Exploring consumer boycott intelligence using a socio-cognitive approach. Journal of Business Research, 63(4), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1985). Consumer boycotts in the United States, 1970–1980: Contemporary events in historical perspective. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 19(1), 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1985.tb00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golan, G. J., & Lim, J. S. (2016). Third-person effect of ISIS’s recruitment propaganda: Online political self-efficacy and social media activism. International Journal of Communication, 10(21), 4681–4701.
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Mundy, P. (1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. The Journalism Quarterly, 70(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffner, C., & Buchanan, M. (2002). Parents’responses to television violence: The third-person perception, parental mediation, and support for censorship. Media Psychology, 4(3), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, C., & Li, C. (2020). To support or to boycott: A public segmentation model in corporate social advocacy. Journal of Public Relations Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2020.1848841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion; psychological studies of opinion change. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Pan, Z., & Sun, Y. (2008). Influence of hostile media perception on willingness to engage in discursive activities: An examination of mediating role of media indignation. Media Psychology, 11(1), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701813454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hydock, C., Paharia, N., & Blair, S. (2020). Should your brand pick a side? How market share determines the impact of corporate political advocacy. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1135–1151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720947682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hydock, C., Paharia, N., & Weber, T. J. (2019). The consumer response to corporate political advocacy: A review and future directions. Customer Needs and Solutions, 6(3), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40547-019-00098-x
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlor, L., Dunwoody, S., Griffin, R. J., Neuwirth, K., & Giese, J. (2003). Studying heuristic‐systematic processing of risk communication. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 23(2), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. W. (2018). They liked and shared: Effects of social media virality metrics on perceptions of message influence and behavioral intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty, B. A. (2007). The relevance of fit in a cause–brand alliance when consumers evaluate corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, V. H., & Wei, R. (2002). Third-person effect, gender, and pornography on the lnternet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, V. H., Wei, R., & Lu, H. Y. (2017). Issue importance, third-person effects of protest news, and participation in Taiwan’s sunflower movement. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(3), 682–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016670122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, V. H., Wei, R., Lu, H. Y., & Hou, H. Y. (2015). Perceived issue importance, information processing, and third-person effect of news about the imported US beef controversy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27(3), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edu039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N. (2008). Completion time and response order effects in web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 914–934. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communications Monographs, 66(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirick, P. C. (2004). Topic-relevant reference groups and dimensions of distance: Political advertising and first-and third-person effects. Communication Research, 31(2), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203261514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirick, P. C. (2005). Rethinking the target corollary: The effects of social distance, perceived exposure, and perceived predispositions on first-person and third-person perceptions. Communication Research, 32(6), 822–843. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205281059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirick, P. C., Sims, J. D., Gilchrist, E. S., & Croucher, S. M. (2009). All the children are above average: Parents’ perceptions of education and materialism as media effects on their own and other children. Mass Communication and Society, 12(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430802439554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuwirth, K., Frederick, E., & Mayo, C. (2002). Person-effects and heuristic-systematic processing. Communication Research, 29(3), 320–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
   Google Scholar
• Parcha, J. M., & Kingsley Westerman, C. Y. (2020). How corporate social advocacy affects attitude change toward controversial social issues. Management Communication Quarterly, 34(3), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318920912196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. S., & Salmon, C. T. (2005). A test of the third-person effect in public relations: Application of social comparison theory. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900508200103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2018, October, 18). Gun policy remains divisive, but several proposals still draw bipartisan support. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/10/18/gun-policy-remains-divisive-but-several-proposals-still-draw-bipartisan-support/
   Google Scholar
• Reid, S. A., & Hogg, M. A. (2005). A self‐categorization explanation for the third‐person effect. Human Communication Research, 31(1), 129–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00867.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H. (2010). “Corrective” actions in the public sphere: How perceptions of media and media effects shape political behaviors. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(3), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, S., Grappi, S., Zarantonello, L., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2015). The revenge of the consumer! How brand moral violations lead to consumer anti-brand activism. Journal of Brand Management, 22(8), 658–672. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2015.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmierbach, M., Boyle, M. P., Xu, Q., & McLeod, D. M. (2011). Exploring third-person differences between gamers and nongamers. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01541.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Pan, Z., & Shen, L. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In J. A. Williams & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., Ribak, R., & Cohen, J. (2005). Rebelde way in Israel: Parental perceptions of television influence and monitoring of children’s social and media activities. Mass Communication & Society, 8(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0801_2
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 77–121). JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, R., Lo, V. H., & Lu, H. Y. (2010). The third-person effect of tainted food product recall news: Examining the role of credibility, attention, and elaboration for college students in Taiwan. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3–4), 598–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901008700310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R., Lo, V. H., & Lu, H. Y. (2011). Examining the perceptual gap and behavioral intention in the perceived effects of polling news in the 2008 Taiwan presidential election. Communication Research, 38(2), 206–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210365536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. (2021). Perceived media bias and intention to engage in discursive activities for mental health: Testing corrective action hypothesis in the context of mass shooting news. Health Communication, 36(14), 1921–1930. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1808404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Lin, M. C. (2021). The effects of social identities and issue involvement on perceptions of media bias against gun owners and intention to participate in discursive activities: In the context of the media coverage of mass shootings. Mass Communication and Society, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1974046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar