Temporal Framing in Balanced News Coverage of Artificial Intelligence and Public Attitudes

References

• Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Communication, 25(8), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.521906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran, S., & Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1086/422116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2013). Counterframing effects. The Journal of Politics, 75(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuan, C. H., Tsai, W. H. S., & Cho, S. Y. (2019, January). Framing artificial intelligence in American newspapers. Proceedings of AAI/ACM Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Society (pp. 339–344). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314285
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, C. E., Hart, P. S., Schuldt, J. P., Evensen, D. T., Boudet, H. S., Jacquet, J. B., & Stedman, R. C. (2015). Public opinion on energy development: The interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology. Energy Policy, 81, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, M. D. (2005). Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005281473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, P. (1999). Uses of expertise: Sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news. Public Understanding of Science, 8(4), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/8/4/302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2006). Media message flows and interpersonal communication: The conditional nature of effects on public opinion. Communication Research, 33(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205283100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudo, A., Dunwoody, S., & Scheufele, D. A. (2011). The emergence of nano news: Tracking thematic trends and changes in US newspaper coverage of nanotechnology. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, T., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2009). Psychological distance and consumer behavior: A construal level theory perspective. In M. Wänke (Ed.), Social psychology of consumer behavior (pp. 65–87). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eyal, T., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Walther, E. (2004). The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fast, E., & Horvitz, E. (2017, February). Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto, CA, (pp. 963–969). AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, T. K., Choi, D. H., Scheufele, D. A., & Shaw, B. R. (2014). Public opinion about biofuels: The interplay between party identification and risk/benefit perception. Energy Policy, 73, 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, K., Salvatier, J., Dafoe, A., Zhang, B., & Evans, O. (2018). Viewpoint: When will AI exceed human performance? Evidence from AI experts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 62, 729–754. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2019). Common concerns with MTurk as a participant pool: Evidence and solutions. In F. R. Kardes, P. M. Herr, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in consumer psychology (pp. 319–337). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, S. M., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2007). Temporal distance and ease of retrieval. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, E. L., Kohl, P., Scheufele, D. A., Clifford, S., Shao, A., Xenos, M. A., & Brossard, D. (2020). Enhanced threat or therapeutic benefit? Risk and benefit perceptions of human gene editing by purpose and heritability of edits. Journal of Risk Research, 25(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1806911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, C. V., Kim, A., Borgida, E., & Chaiken, S. (2010). Revisiting the self-interest versus values debate: The role of temporal perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1155–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272–1287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212449362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/191485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., & Ahn, S. J. (2019). The moderating role of cultural background in temporal framing: Focusing on climate change awareness advertising. Asian Journal of Communication, 29(4), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2019.1624793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Nan, X. (2019). Temporal framing effects differ for narrative versus non-narrative messages: The case of promoting HPV vaccination. Communication Research, 46(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215626980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Yeo, S. K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2014). Disentangling the influence of value predispositions and risk/benefit perceptions on support for nanotechnology among the American public. Risk Analysis, 34(5), 965–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Zhang, M., & Li, X. (2008). Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 706–713. https://doi.org/10.1086/592131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J. (2019). The role of construal level in message effects research: A review and future directions. Communication Theory, 29(3), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T. (2017). TurkPrime. com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Yang, R., & Xu, Z. (2019). Public acceptance of fully automated driving: Effects of social trust and risk/benefit perceptions. Risk Analysis, 39(2), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2007, November 12). What is artificial intelligence? http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai/
   Google Scholar
• Miller, N. E. (1944). Experimental studies of conflict. In M. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (pp. 431–465). Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. A., & Duck, J. M. (2001). Communication and health beliefs: Mass and interpersonal influences on perceptions of risk to self and others. Communication Research, 28(5), 602–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M. (2019, January 24). Will robots take your job? Quarter of US workers at risk. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/6034c9ce1af347ec8da996e39b29c51b?fbclid=IwAR2r2NNq-t_yRDtX89oFG_dQSq4ChhUWMYVgjS34NuUaGoT-v6N0m_X1E6c
   Google Scholar
• Orbell, S., & Hagger, M. (2006). Temporal framing and the decision to take part in type 2 diabetes screening: Effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on persuasion. Health Psychology, 25(4), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbell, S., & Kyriakaki, M. (2008). Temporal framing and persuasion to adopt preventive health behavior: Moderating effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on sunscreen use. Health Psychology, 27(6), 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.6.770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouchchy, L., Coin, A., & Dubljević, V. (2020). AI in the headlines: The portrayal of the ethical issues of artificial intelligence in the media. AI & Socity, 35(4), 927–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00965-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S. (2009). From public understanding to public engagement: An empirical assessment of changes in science coverage. Science Communication, 30(4), 475–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008326943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2014). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication theories (pp. 1–28). Oxford University Press. online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.47.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(6), 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmelzer, R. (2019, October 17). The AI-enabled future. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognitiveworld/2019/10/17/the-ai-enabled-future/?sh=4bcc36da3339
   Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Bigsby, E. (2013). The effects of message features: Content, structure, and style. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 20–35). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218410.n2
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 20(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, J., Kuang, K., & Cho, H. (2019). Information seeking upon exposure to risk messages: Predictors, outcomes, and mediating roles of health information seeking. Communication Research, 46(5), 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216679536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangari, A. H., & Smith, R. J. (2012). How the temporal framing of energy savings influences consumer product evaluations and choice. Psychology & Marketing, 29(4), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S. (2014). On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1996). Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of Health Communication, 1(4), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/108107396127988
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wooldridge, M. (2021). A brief history of artificial intelligence: what it is, where we are, and where we are going. Flatiron Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. (1996). The myth of massive media impact revived: New support for a discredited idea. In D. C. Mutz, P. M. Sniderman, & R. M. Brody (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 17–78). Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Nan, X., Iles, I. A., & Yang, B. (2015). Temporal framing and consideration of future consequences: Effects on smokers’ and at-risk nonsmokers’ responses to cigarette health warnings. Health Communication, 30(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.974122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar