Setting the Agenda: Family Communication Scholars as Expert Witnesses

References

• Abrams, D., Cahn, N., Ross, C., & McClain, L. (2019). Contemporary family law (American casebook series) (5th ed.). West Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Afifi, T. D., & Schrodt, P. (2003). “Feeling caught” as a mediator of adolescents’ and young adults’ avoidance and satisfaction with their parents in divorced and non-divorced households. Communication Monographs, 70(2), 142–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775032000133791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi, T. D., & Steuber, K. (2009). The revelation risk model (RRM): Factors that predict the revelation of secrets and the strategies to reveal them. Communication Monographs, 76(2), 144–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750902828412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi, W. A., & Weiner, J. L. (2004). Toward a theory of motivated information management. Communication Theory, 14(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14682885.2004.tb00310.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloia, L. S., & Strutzenberg, C. (2019). Parent-child communication apprehension: The role of parental alienation and self-esteem. Communication Reports, 32(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2018.1514641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amundson, J., & Lux, G. (2019). Tippins and Wittman revisited: Law, social science, and the role of the child custody expert 14 years later. Family Court Review, 57(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragon-Amonarriz, C., Arredondo, A. M., & Iturrioz Landart, C. (2019). How can responsible family ownership be sustained across generations? A family social capital approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(1), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3728-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodsky, S. L. (2023). Testifying in court: Guidelines and maxims for the expert witness (3rd ed.). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P. (2003). Family communication standards: What counts as excellent family communication and how are such standards associated with family satisfaction? Human Communication Research, 29(1), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/29.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. (1993). Inc., 509. U.S.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, S., & Wu, Z. (2014). Family ownership and corporate misconduct in U.S. small firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1812-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, L. E., & Donohue, W. A. (1996). Communicative framing theory in conflict resolution. Communication Research, 23(3), 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber, M. (1994). Rainmaking; Women as rainmaker–A personal perspective. Law Practice Management, 20(3), 27. https://doi.org/10.1108/09552069410064838
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, K. (2006). Diversity’s impact on defining the family: Discourse-dependence and identity. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 3–19). Sage Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233024.n1
   Google Scholar
• Gold-Biken, L. Z. (2018). Direct examination of expert witnesses: Help them tell their story. The Legal Intelligencer (Online). https://www.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/2018/05/10/direct-examination-of-expert-witnesses-help-them-tell-their-story/. Last Retrieved January 13, 2023
   Google Scholar
• Goussinsky, R., Michael, K., & Yassour-Borochowitz, D. (2020). Relationship dynamics and intimate partner violence in Israeli college students: The moderating effect of communication problems. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(23–24), 5812–5833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517724833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, K. (2009). An integrated model of health disclosure decision-making. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications (pp. 226–254). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. J., Carbone, J. R., Teitelbaum, L. E., & Rebouche, R. (2018). Family law (Aspen casebook) (6th ed.). Aspen Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. L. (2001). Reconceptualizing the expert witness: Social costs, current controls and proposed responses. Yale Journal on Regulation, 18(2), 253–315.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. W., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2012). Pursuing justice for unwanted pursuit: Stalking research in the courtroom. In M. T. Motley (Ed.), Forensic communication: Application of communication research in courtroom litigation (pp. 141–160). Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuang, K., & Wilson, S. R. (2021). Theory of motivated information management: A meta-analytic review. Communication Theory, 31(3), 463–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logos, K., Brewer, N., & Young, R. L. (2021). Countering biased judgments of individuals who display autism-characteristic behavior in forensic settings. Human Communication Research, 47(3), 215–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqab002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messinger, A. M., Rickert, V. I., Fry, D. A., Lessel, H., & Davidson, L. L. (2012). Revisiting the role of communication in adolescent intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(14), 2920–2935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512438276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motley, M. T. (2012). Forensic communication: Application of communication research in courtroom litigation. Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Mara, C., & Schrodt, P. (2017). Parents’ negative relational disclosures and young adult children’s perceptions of appropriateness and feelings of being caught. Communication Quarterly, 65(5), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2017.1321563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petronio, S. (2013). Brief status report on communication privacy management theory. Journal of Family Communication, 13(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2013.743426
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, M. J., Fowler, C., Kaplan, M. S., Nussbaum, J., & Becker, J. C. (2009). Dialectical tensions underpinning family farm succession planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880802592631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polsky, C. (2019). Open records, shuttered labs: Ending political harassment of public university researchers. UCLA Law Review, 66(1), 208–293. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3140154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, A. G. (2021). Rejecting ‘unjustified’ rejection: Why family courts should exclude parental alienation experts. Boston College Law Review, 62(5), 1759–1796.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, E. C. (2021). A ward of the state: The first amendment as protecting the best interest of the child in custody disputes. Kentucky Law Journal Online. https://www.kentuckylawjournal.org/online-originals/a-ward-of-the-state-the-first-amendment-as-protecting-the-best-interest-of-the-child-in-custody-disputes. Last Retrieved January 14, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Rickard, E. (2019). Many U.S. families faced civil legal issues in 2018: Survey highlights need for alternative approaches to help people navigate the courts. The Pew Charitable Trusts. https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2019/11/19/many-us-families-faced-civil-legal- issues issuesin2018. 2018. Last Retrieved January 12, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Rikon, M. (2019). Advice to expert witnesses. New York Law Journal. https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2019/10/21/advice-to-expert-witnesses/. Last Retrieved January 14, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Rittenour, C. (2012). Daughter-in-law standards for mother-in-law communication: Associations with daughter-in-law perceptions of relational satisfaction and shared family identity. Journal of Family Communication, 12(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2010.537240
   Google Scholar
• Sabourin, T. C., Infante, D. A., & Rudd, J. E. (1993). Verbal aggression in marriages: A comparison of violent, distressed but nonviolent, and nondistressed couples. Human Communication Research, 20(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00323.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M., Hintz, E. A., & Duerringer, C. M. (2022). Setting the agenda: Beyond discourse dependence and a dependence on discourse. Journal of Family Communication, 22(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2022.2041997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, E. T. (2008). Allies not adversaries: Teaching collaboration to the next generation of doctors and lawyers to address social inequality. Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 11, 249. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/jhclp/vol11/iss2/4
   Google Scholar
• Webb, D. K., & Reich, J. D. (2009). Expert witness prep. The National Law Journal, 31(25), 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Whitchurch, G. G., & Dickson, F. C. (1999). Family communication. In M. Sussman, S. Steinmetz, & G. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (2nd ed, pp. 687–704). Plenum.
   Google Scholar