Racial-Genomic Interest Convergence and the Geneticization of Black Families

References

• Bank, A. (2000). Evolution and racial theory: The hidden side of Wilhelm bleek. South African Historical Journal, 43(1), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02582470008671911
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. (1980). Brown v. Board of education and the interest-convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 93(3), 518–433. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. (1995). Who’s afraid of critical race theory? University of Illinois Law Review, 4, 893–910.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. (2016). Catching our breath: Critical race STS and the carceral imagination. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2016.70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, K. M. (2019). Critical race theory: A primer. Foundation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. (2021, November 4). All those 23andMe spit tests were part of a bigger plan. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-11-04/23andme-to-use-dna-tests-to-make-cancer-drugs
   Google Scholar
• Browne, S. (2015). Dark matters: On the surveillance of blackness. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brummett, E. A., & Afifi, T. D. (2019). A grounded theory of interracial romantic partners’ expectations for support and strain with family members. Journal of Family Communication, 19(3), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2019.1623220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, L. M., Bonilla‐Silva, E., Ray, V., Buckelew, R., & Hordge Freeman, E. (2010). Critical race theories, colorism, and the decade’s research on families of color. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 440–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00712.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In J. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 155–172). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chatters, L., Taylor, R. J., & Jayakody, R. (1994). Fictive kinship relations in black extended families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 25(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.25.3.297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow-White, P. (2012). The informationalization of race: Communication, databases, and the digital coding of the genome. In K. Wailoo, A. Nelson, & C. Lee (Eds.), Genetics and the unsettled past: The collision of DNA, race, and history (pp. 81–103). Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, F. S., & Mansoura, M. K. (2001). The human genome project: Revealing the shared inheritance of all humankind. Cancer, 91(1), 221–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(8). http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
   Google Scholar
• Daly Weisse, K., Jung, J., & Sharp-Hoskins, K. (2021). Algorithmic abstraction and the racial neoliberal rhetorics of 23andMe. Rhetoric Review, 40(3), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2021.1922800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, L. T. (2023). Addressing the feasibility of people of African descent finding living African relatives using direct-to-consumer genetic testing. American Journal of Biological Anthropology, 181(2), 163–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24705
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, C. S. (2017). Focus groups: Applying communication theory through design, facilitation, and analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315298511
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S. M. (2015). The “strong black woman collective”: A developing theoretical framework for understanding collective communication practices of black women. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2014.953714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, S. M. (2019). When sistahs support sistahs: A process of supportive communication about racial microaggressions among black women. Communication Monographs, 86(2), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1548769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, S. M., & Cardwell, M. E. (2022). Family communication as raced. In J. Manning, J. Allen, & K. Denker (Eds.), Family communication as… Exploring metaphors for family communication (pp. 67–74). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical race theory: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ggjjn3
   Google Scholar
• Duster, T. (2003). Backdoor to eugenics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426951
   Google Scholar
• Foeman, A. (2009). Science and magic: DNA and the racial narratives that shape the social construction of race in the USA. Intercultural Communication Studies, 18(2), 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Foeman, A., & Lawton, B. L. (2022). Who am I?: Identity in the age of consumer DNA testing. Cognella Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, M. (1993). Othermothers: Exploring the educational philosophy of Black American women teachers. In M. Arnot & K. Weiler (Eds.), Feminism and social justice in education: International perspectives (pp. 101–121). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullwiley, D. (2011). Can DNA “witness” race? Forensic uses of an imperfect ancestry testing technology. In S. Krimsky & K. Sloan (Eds.), Race and the genetic revolution: Science, myth, and culture (pp. 116–126). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiadis, M. (2020, February 5). Our path forward. Ancestry. https://www.ancestry.com/corporate/blog/our-path-forward
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• GlaxoSmithKline. (2018). GSK and 23andMe sign agreement to leverage genetic insights for the development of novel medicines. GlaxoSmithKline. https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/press-releases/gsk-and-23andme-sign-agreement-to-leverage-genetic-insights-for-the-development-of-novel-medicines/
   Google Scholar
• Graf, N. (2019). Mail-in DNA test results bring surprises about family history for many users. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/06/mail-in-dna-test-results-bring-surprises-about-family-history-for-many-users/
   Google Scholar
• Harris, T. M. (2018). Interracial communication, critical approaches. In Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication (pp. 1–12). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, S. V. (2008). Lose your mother: A journey along the Atlantic slave route. Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, A. L., Saperstein, A., Little, J., Maiers, M., & Hollenbach, J. A. (2019). Consumer (dis-)interest in genetic ancestry testing: The roles of race, immigration, and ancestral certainty. New Genetics and Society, 38(2), 165–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2018.1562327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, M. (1994). When black women talk with white women: Why dialogues are difficult. In A. González & V. Chen (Eds.), Our voices: Essays in culture, ethnicity, and communication (pp. 133–139). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, M. (2002). Seeking difference: African Americans in interpersonal communication research. Howard Journal of Communications, 13(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/106461702753555021
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, D., & Nelson, L. R. (2021). Setting the agenda: Black families matter. Journal of Family Communication, 21(4), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2021.1954649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ideland, M. (2018). Science, coloniality, and “the great rationality divide”: How practices, places, and persons are culturally attached to one another in science education. Science & Education, 27(7–8), 783–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0006-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. L., & Givens, S. M. B. (2006). Black pioneers in communication research. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452225692
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, R. L. (2012). Transcending blackness: From the New Millennium Mulatta to the exceptional multiracial. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. (2014). Race in a bottle: The story of BiDil and racialized medicine in a post-genomic age. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelsie, A. (2020). ‘I know who you are’: Antiblackness in the speculative rhetorics of genetic genealogy [ Dissertation]. University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (2016). Data sovereignty for Indigenous peoples: Current practice and future needs. In Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda (pp. 1–22). Australian National University Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.01
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. S.-J. (2012). Waiting on the promise of prescribing precision. In K. Wailoo, A. Nelson, & C. Lee (Eds.), Genetics and the unsettled past: The collision of DNA, race, and history (pp. 164–180). Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malagon, M. C., Perez Huber, L., & Velez, V. (2009). Our experiences, our methods: Using grounded theory to inform critical race theory methodology. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 81, 253–272.
   Google Scholar
• Mamdani, M. (2002). When victims become killers: Colonialism, nativism, and the genocide in Rwanda. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691193830
   Google Scholar
• Minniear, M., & Cardwell, M. E. (2021). Critical race theory: dismantling racial oppression through interpersonal communication. In Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 246–257). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Minniear, M., & Soliz, J. (2019). Family communication and messages about race and identity in black families in the United States. Journal of Family Communication, 19(4), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2019.1593170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670.
   Google Scholar
• Native BioData Consortium. (2022). Research for natives by natives. Native BioData Consortium. https://nativebio.org/
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. (2008). Bio science: Genetic genealogy testing and the pursuit of African ancestry. Social Studies of Science, 38(5), 759–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312708091929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. (2016). Social life of DNA. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nishime, L. (2020). Mixed-race Asian Americans and contemporary media and culture. In Oxford research encyclopedia of literature. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.854
   Google Scholar
• Olaore, A. Y., & Drolet, J. (2017). Indigenous knowledge, beliefs, and cultural practices for children and families in Nigeria. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 26(3), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2016.1241973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omi, M. (2010). “Slippin’ into darkness”: The (re)biologization of race. Journal of Asian American Studies, 13(3), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.2010.0001
   Google Scholar
• Orbe, M., & Harris, T. M. (2023). Interracial communication: Theory into practice. Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panofsky, A., & Donovan, J. (2019). Genetic ancestry testing among white nationalists: From identity repair to citizen science. Social Studies of Science, 49(5), 653–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719861434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, S. (2018). Genetic testing and family secrets. Monitor on Psychology, 49(6), 44.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, D. (1979). Black-white communication: An assessment of research. In M. K. Asante, E. Newmark, & C. Blake (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 383–402). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, C. (2021). “Add up all my black”: Understanding race and genetic ancestry through critical interpersonal and family communication. Review of Communication, 21(3), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2021.1961851
   Google Scholar
• Putman, A. L., & Cole, K. L. (2020). All hail DNA: The constitutive rhetoric of AncestryDNATM advertising. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 37(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2020.1767796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putman, A. L., & Kvam, D. S. (2023). “I’m generally just a white European mutt”: Communication strategies for interpreting and sharing DNA-based ancestry test results. Journal of International & Intercultural Communication, 16(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2021.1942144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. (1996). Essays on the anthropology of reason. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, J., & TallBear, K. (2012). “Your DNA is our history”: Genomics, anthropology, and the construction of whiteness as property. Current Anthropology, 53(S5), S233–S245. https://doi.org/10.1086/662629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regalado, A. (2019, February 11). More than 26 million people have taken an at-home ancestry test. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/02/11/103446/more-than-26-million-people-have-taken-an-at-home-ancestry-test/
   Google Scholar
• Risher, M. T. (2011). Racial disparities in databanking of DNA profiles. In S. Krimsky & K. Sloan (Eds.), Race and the genetic revolution: Science, myth, and culture (pp. 47–67). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. E. (1990). Punishing drug addicts who have babies: Women of color, equality, and the right of privacy. Harvard Law Review, 104(7), 1419. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. E. (2012). Fatal invention: How science, politics, and big business re-create race in the twenty-first century. The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. D., & Ivemark, B. (2018). Genetic options: The impact of genetic ancestry testing on consumers’ racial and ethnic identities. American Journal of Sociology, 124(1), 150–184. https://doi.org/10.1086/697487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini, A. (2019). Superior: The return of race science. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samudzi, Z. (2021). Capturing German South West Africa: Racial production, land claims, and belonging in the afterlife of the Herero and Nama genocide [ Dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenbrun, D. (2004). Representing the Bantu expansions: What’s at stake? The International Journal of African Historical Studies, 34(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097284
   Google Scholar
• Scodari, C. (2017). When markers meet marketing: Ethnicity, race, hybridity, and kinship in genetic genealogy television advertising. Genealogy, 1(4), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy1040022
   Google Scholar
• Soliz, J., & Phillips, K. E. (2018). Toward a more expansive understanding of family communication: Considerations for inclusion of ethnic-racial and global diversity. Journal of Family Communication, 18(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2017.1399890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillers, H. J. (1987). Mama’s baby, papa’s maybe: An American grammar book. Diacritics, 17(2), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/464747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, N., Hoffmann, A. L., & Florini, S. (2021). The unremarked optimum: Whiteness, optimization, and control in the database revolution. Review of Communication, 21(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2021.1934521
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tsosie, K. S., Begay, R. L., Fox, K., & Garrison, N. A. (2020). Generations of genomes: Advances in paleogenomics technology and engagement for Indigenous people of the Americas. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 62, 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2020.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, L. H., & West, R. (2003). Introduction: Breaking through silence: Increasing voice for diverse families in communication research. Journal of Family Communication, 3(4), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327698JFC0304_1
   Google Scholar
• Wailoo, K. (2012). Who am I? Genes and the problem of historical identity. In K. Wailoo, A. Nelson, & C. Lee (Eds.), Genetics and the unsettled past: The collision of DNA, race, and history (13–19). Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, H. (2011). Prejudice, stigma, and DNA databases. In S. Krimsky & K. Sloan (Eds.), Race and the genetic revolution: Science, myth, and culture (pp. 68–96). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Washington, M. (2020). “Draw your own box”: Deciphering Meghan Markle’s mixed-race identity. Women’s Studies in Communication, 43(4), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2020.1833630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. P. (2020). Fitting the description: Historical and sociotechnical elements of facial recognition and anti-black surveillance. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1831365
   Google Scholar