Understanding Power in Hybrid Political Orders: Applying Stakeholder Analysis to Land Conflicts in Cambodia

References

• AnstisS.2012, ‘Access to Justice in Cambodia: The Experience of Grassroots Networks in Land Rights Issues’, Legal Working Paper Series on Legal Empowerment for Sustainable Development, Centre for International Sustainable Development Law, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• BoegeV., BrownA., ClementsK. & NolanA.2008, ‘On Hybrid Political Orders and Emerging States: State Formation in the Context Of “Fragility”’, Berghof Research Centre for Constructive Conflict Management.
   Google Scholar
• BourdieuP.1977, Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CastellsM.2000, The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Oxford: Blackwell, Vol. 1.
   Google Scholar
• ChandlerD.2013, ‘Peacebuilding and the Politics of Non-linearity: Rethinking “Hidden” Agency and “Resistance”’ in Peacebuilding1: 1: 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• ChhornC. & WelshJ.2011, ‘Hun Sen Order Gives Land to B Kak Families’ in Cambodia Daily, 16 August: 1.
   Google Scholar
• ClunanA. & TrinkunasH.2010, Ungoverned Spaces: Alternatives to State Authority in an Era of Softened Sovereignty, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiproseR., DeeksP. & InvongS.2005, Dispute Resolution and Commune Councils in Cambodia: A Study of Conflict and Best Practices for Peace, Phnom Penh: Center for Advanced Study.
   Google Scholar
• DonaisT.2013, ‘Towards Vertically Integrated Peace Building: Bridging Top-down and Bottom-up Approaches’, workshop report, Centre for International Governance Innovation: http://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/donais_vertical_integration_workshop_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FoucaultM.1991, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of a Prison, London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• FreemanR.E.1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• GledhillJ.1994, Power and its Disguises: Anthropological Perspectives on Politics, London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• GrimbleR. & WellardK.1997, ‘Stakeholder Methodologies in Natural Resource Management: A Review of Principles, Contexts, Experiences and Opportunities’ in Agricultural Systems Journal55: 2: 173–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallD., HirschP. & LiT.M.2011, Powers of Exclusion: Land Dilemmas in Southeast Asia, Singapore: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• HigginsA.2012, ‘Land Disputes in Cambodia Focus Ire on Chinese Investors'’ in Washington Post, 25 September.
   Google Scholar
• HugginsC. & OchiengB.2005, ‘Paradigms, Processes and Practicalities of Land Reform in Postconflict Sub-Saharan Africa’ in Huggins, C. & Clover, J. eds, From the Ground up: Land Rights, Conflict and Peace in Sub-Saharan Africa, Pretoria: ACTS, ISS: 27–54.
   Google Scholar
• HughesC.2013, ‘Friction, Good Governance and the Poor: Cases from Cambodia’ in International Peacekeeping20: 2: 144–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HulR. & VriezeP.2010, ‘Hun Sen Defends Gov't Role in Land Dispute’ in Cambodia Daily, 31 August: 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• KhuonN. & VriezeP.2011, ‘Land Tycoon Lavishes Largesse on Sanctuary Staff’ in Cambodia Daily, 1 September: 26.
   Google Scholar
• KuchN. & VriezeP.2012, ‘Government Drafts a Plan to Protect Prey Lang’ in Cambodia Daily, 3 February: 25.
   Google Scholar
• KinseyB.H.2004, ‘Zimbabwe's Land Reform Program: Underinvestment in Post-conflict Transformation’ in World Development32: 10: 1669–1696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KraushaarM. & LambachD.2009, ‘Hybrid Political Orders: The Added Value of a New Concept’, Australian Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies Occasional Papers Series, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Mac GintyR.2011, International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance. Rethinking Peace and Conflict, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mac GintyR. & RichmondO.2013, ‘The Local Turn in Peacebuilding: A Critical Agenda for Peace’ in Third World Quarterly34: 5: 763–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarksS. & HulR.2011, ‘At Donor Meet, US Ties NGO Law to Aid’ in Cambodia Daily, 21 April: 15.
   Google Scholar
• McDonaldJ.A.2004, Ecological Survey of Prey Lang, Kampong Thom: A Proposal for the Conservation of Indochina's Last Undisturbed Lowland Rainforests, Texas: University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• MillarG., van der LijnJ. & VerkorenW.2013, ‘Peacebuilding Plans and Local Reconfigurations: Frictions between Imported Processes and Indigenous Practices’ in International Peacekeeping20: 2: 137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MillikenJ. & KrauseK.2002, ‘State Failure, State Collapse and State Reconstruction: Concepts, Lessons, and Strategies’ in Development and Change33: 5: 753–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGOF2011, Statistical Analysis on Land Disputes Occurring in Cambodia, 2010, Phnom Penh.
   Google Scholar
• O'KeefeK.2009, Land Is Life: Land Conflict Interventions in Cambodia, Phnom Penh: NGOF.
   Google Scholar
• OstromE.1999, ‘Polycentric, Complexity, and the Commons’ in Good Society9: 2: 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam GB2007, Report on Land Holding in Cambodia, Phnom Penh.
   Google Scholar
• ParisR. & SiskT.2009, ‘Conclusion: Confronting the Contradictions’ in Paris, R. & Sisk, T. eds, The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations, London: Routledge: 304–315.
   Google Scholar
• PelS., Le MeurP.-Y., SamV., LiangL., PelS., HayL. & ImS.2008, Land Transactions in Rural Cambodia: A Synthesis of Findings from Research on Appropriation and Derived Rights to Land, Nogent-sur-Marne: GRET.
   Google Scholar
• PhornB. & ZsomborP.2011, ‘Foreign Ministry Tells NGOs to “Readjust” Their Actions’ in Cambodia Daily, 19 August: 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• PrellC., HubacekK. & ReedM.2009, ‘Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management’ in Society & Natural Resources22: 6: 501–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuters2011, ‘Land Grabs Mar Cambodia's Investment Boom’, 5 September: 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• RichmondO. & FranksJ.2007, ‘Liberal Hubris? Virtual Peace in Cambodia’ in Security Dialogue38: 1: 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobertsD.2009, ‘The Superficiality of Statebuilding in Cambodia: Patronage and Clientelism as Enduring Forms of Politics’ in Paris, R. & Sisk, T. eds, The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations, London: Routledge: 149–170.
   Google Scholar
• RowleyT.1997, ‘Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences’ in Academy of Management Review22: 4: 887–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SoS.2010, ‘Land Rights in Cambodia: An Unfinished Reform’ in Asia Pacific Issues Analysis from the East West Center 97.
   Google Scholar
• SpringerS.2010, Cambodia's Neoliberal Order: Violence, Authoritarianism, and the Contestation of Public Space, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• UnK.2005, ‘Patronage Politics and Hybrid Democracy: Political Change in Cambodia 1993–2003’ in Asian Perspective29: 2: 203–230.
   Google Scholar
• UnK. & SoS.2011, ‘Land Rights in Cambodia: How Neopatrimonial Politics Restricts Land Policy Reform’ in Pacific Affairs84: 2: 289–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van LeeuwenM. & VerkorenW.2012, ‘Complexities and Challenges for Civil Society Building in Post-conflict Settings’ in Journal of Peacebuilding and Development7: 1: 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• VriezeP. & VanR.2010, ‘Over 140 People Jailed in Land Disputes since '08, Adhoc Says’ in Cambodia Daily, 18 August: 25.
   Google Scholar
• WakchekonL.2003, ‘Clientelism and Voting Behaviour: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Benin’ in World Politics55: 3: 400.
   Google Scholar
• WeberM.1978, Economy and Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank2004, A Fair Share for Women: Cambodia Gender Assessment, Phnom Penh: World Bank.
   Google Scholar