Assessment of emissions and exposure in 3D printing workplaces in Taiwan

References

• Afshar-Mohajer N, Wu CY, Ladun T, Rajon DA, Huang Y. 2015. Characterization of particulate matters and total VOC emissions from a binder jetting 3D printer. Build Environ. 93:293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimi P, Zhao D, Pouzet C, Crain NE, Stephens B. 2016. Emissions of ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds from commercially available desktop three-dimensional printers with multiple filaments. Environ Sci Technol. 50(3):1260–1268. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balletti C, Ballarin M, Guerra F. 2017. 3D printing: state of the art and future perspectives. J Cult Herit. 26:172–182. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2017.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan FL, House R, Kudla I, Lipszyc JC, Rajaram N, Tarlo SM. 2018. Health survey of employees regularly using 3D printers. Occup Med (Lond). 68(3):211–214. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqy042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R, Yin H, Cole IS, Shen S, Zhou X, Wang Y, Tang S. 2020. Exposure, assessment and health hazards of particulate matter in metal additive manufacturing: a review. Chemosphere. 259:127452. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristescu SM, Gietema HA, Blanchet L, Kruitwagen CLJJ, Munnik P, Van Klaveren RJ, Lammers JWJ, Buydens L, Harren FJM, Zanen P. 2011. Screening for emphysema via exhaled volatile organic compounds. J Breath Res. 5(4):046009. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/5/4/046009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis AY, Zhang Q, Wong JPS, Weber RJ, Black MS. 2019. Characterization of volatile organic compound emissions from consumer level material extrusion 3D printers. Build Environ. 160:106209. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding S, Ng BF, Shang X, Liu H, Lu X, Wan MP. 2019. The characteristics and formation mechanisms of emissions from thermal decomposition of 3D printer polymer filaments. Sci Total Environ. 692:984–994. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Preez S, Johnson A, LeBouf RF, Linde SJL, Stefaniak AB, Du Plessis J. 2018. Exposures during industrial 3-D printing and post-processing tasks. Rapid Prototyping J. 24(5):865–871. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn KL, Hammond D, Menchaca K, Roth G, Dunn KH. 2020. Reducing ultrafine particulate emission from multiple 3D printers in an office environment using a prototype engineering control. J Nanopart Res. 22(5):112. doi: 10.1007/s11051-020-04844-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd EL, Wang J, Regens JL. 2017. Fume emissions from a low-cost 3-D printer with various filaments. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(7):523–533. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1302587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu J, Wensing M, Uhde E, Salthammer T. 2019. Characterization of particulate and gaseous pollutants emitted during operation of a desktop 3D printer. Environ Int. 123:476–485. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AC, Osio-Norgaard J, Miller S, Whiting GL, Vance ME. 2021. Air pollutant emissions from multi jet fusion, material-jetting, and digital light synthesis commercial 3D printers in a service bureau. Build Environ. 202:108008. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegab H, Khanna N, Monib N, Salem A. 2023. Design for sustainable additive manufacturing: a review. Sustain Mater Technol. 35:e00576. doi: 10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds W, Zhu Y. 2022. Aerosol technology: properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles. 3rd ed. New York (NY) Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon H, Park J, Kim S, Park K, Yoon C. 2020. Effect of nozzle temperature on the emission rate of ultrafine particles during 3D printing. Indoor Air. 30(2):306–314. doi: 10.1111/ina.12624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon O, Yoon C, Ham S, Park J, Lee J, Yoo D, Kim Y. 2017. Characterization and control of nanoparticle emission during 3D printing. Environ Sci Technol. 51(18):10357–10368. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manoj A, Bhuyan M, Banik SR, Ravi Sankar M. 2021. Review on particle emissions during fused deposition modeling of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and polylactic acid polymers. Mater Today Proc. 44:1375–1383. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.521.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes L, Kangas A, Kukko K, Mølgaard B, Säämänen A, Kanerva T, Flores Ituarte I, Huhtiniemi M, Stockmann-Juvala H, Partanen J, et al. 2017. Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer. J Indus Ecol. 21(S1):S94–S106. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12569.
   Google Scholar
• Min K, Li Y, Wang D, Chen B, Ma M, Hu L, Liu Q, Jiang G. 2021. 3D printing-induced fine particle and volatile organic compound emission: an emerging health risk. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 8(8):616–625. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi AA, Zarei A, Majidi S, Ghaderpoury A, Hashempour Y, Saghi MH, Alinejad A, Yousefi M, Hosseingholizadeh N, Ghaderpoori M. 2019. Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals in drinking water of Khorramabad, Iran. MethodsX. 6:1642–1651. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.07.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtar MA, Jayaratne R, Morawska L, Mazaheri M, Surawski N, Buonanno G. 2013. NSAM-derived total surface area versus SMPS-derived “mobility equivalent” surface area for different environmentally relevant aerosols. J Aerosol Sci. 66:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafaei A, Elliott AM, Barnes JE, Li F, Tan W, Cramer CL, Nandwana P, Chmielus M. 2021. Binder jet 3D printing—process parameters, materials, properties, modeling, and challenges. Prog Mater Sci. 119:100707. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugroho WT, Dong Y, Pramanik A. 2021. Chapter 4: 3D printing composite materials: a comprehensive review. In: Low I-M, Dong Y, editors. Composite materials: manufacturing, properties and applications. p. 65–115. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-820512-9.00013-7.
   Google Scholar
• Oberdörster G. 2000. Toxicology of ultrafine particles: in vivo studies. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 358:2719–2740. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2000.0680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J. 2005. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect. 113(7):823–839. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro ND, Freire RT, Conrado JAM, Batista AD, da Silveira Petruci JF. 2021. Paper-based optoelectronic nose for identification of indoor air pollution caused by 3D printing thermoplastic filaments. Anal Chim Acta. 1143:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.11.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter PM, Al-Abed SR, Lay D, Lomnicki SM. 2019. VOC emissions and formation mechanisms from carbon nanotube composites during 3D printing. Environ Sci Technol. 53(8):4364–4370. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quan H, Zhang T, Xu H, Luo S, Nie J, Zhu X. 2020. Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioact Mater. 5(1):110–115. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Balasubramanian R. 2020. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a portable air cleaner in mitigating indoor human exposure to cooking-derived airborne particles. Environ Res. 183:109192. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Gupta A, Tripathi O, Srivastava S, Singh B, Awasthi A, Rajput SK, Sonia P, Singhal P, Saxena KK. 2020. Powder bed fusion process in additive manufacturing: an overview. Mater Today Proc. 26:3058–3070. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.635.
   Google Scholar
• Sioutas C, Delfino RJ, Singh M. 2005. Exposure assessment for atmospheric ultrafine particles (UFPs) and implications in epidemiologic research. Environ Health Perspect. 113(8):947–955. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stabile L, Scungio M, Buonanno G, Arpino F, Ficco G. 2017. Airborne particle emission of a commercial 3D printer: the effect of filament material and printing temperature. Indoor Air. 27(2):398–408. doi: 10.1111/ina.12310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak AB, Bowers LN, Knepp AK, Luxton TP, Peloquin DM, Baumann EJ, Ham JE, Wells JR, Johnson AR, LeBouf RF, et al. 2019. Particle and vapor emissions from vat polymerization desktop-scale 3-dimensional printers. J Occup Environ Hyg. 16(8):519–531. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2019.1612068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak AB, Du Preez S, Du Plessis JL. 2021. Additive manufacturing for occupational hygiene: a comprehensive review of processes, emissions, & exposures. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 24(5):1–50. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2021.1936319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak AB, Lebouf RF, Yi J, Ham J, Nurkewicz T, Schwegler-Berry DE, Chen BT, Wells JR, Duling MG, Lawrence RB, et al. 2017. Characterization of chemical contaminants generated by a desktop fused deposition modeling 3-dimensional printer. J Occup Environ Hyg. 14(7):540–550. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1302589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinle P. 2016. Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer and indoor air measurements in office settings. J Occup Environ Hyg. 13(2):121–132. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1091957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens B, Azimi P, El Orch Z, Ramos T. 2013. Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers. Atmos Environ. 79:334–339. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sze-To GN, Wu CL, Chao CYH, Wan MP, Chan TC. 2012. Exposure and cancer risk toward cooking-generated ultrafine and coarse particles in Hong Kong homes. HVAC&R Res. 18(1-2):204–216. doi: 10.1080/10789669.2011.598443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan LJ, Zhu W, Zhou K. 2020. Recent progress on polymer materials for additive manufacturing. Adv Funct Materials. 30(43). doi: 10.1002/adfm.202003062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi S, Yadav A, Deshmukh S. 2022. Review on mechanical characterization of 3D printed parts created using material jetting process. Mater Today Proc. 51:1012–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.073.
   Google Scholar
• Vance ME, Pegues V, Van Montfrans S, Leng W, Marr LC. 2017. Aerosol emissions from fuse-deposition modeling 3d printers in a chamber and in real indoor environments. Environ Sci Technol. 51(17):9516–9523. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viitanen AK, Kallonen K, Kukko K, Kanerva T, Saukko E, Hussein T, Hämeri K, Säämänen A. 2021. Technical control of nanoparticle emissions from desktop 3D printing. Indoor Air. 31(4):1061–1071. doi: 10.1111/ina.12791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warheit DB. 2004. Nanoparticles: health impacts? Mater Today. 7(2):32–35. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(04)00081-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi J, LeBouf RF, Duling MG, Nurkiewicz T, Chen BT, Schwegler-Berry D, Virji MA, Stefaniak AB. 2016. Emission of particulate matter from a desktop three-dimensional (3D) printer. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 79(11):453–465. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2016.1166467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn JS, Seo JW, Han S, Jeon KJ. 2019. Characteristics of nanoparticle formation and hazardous air pollutants emitted by 3D printer operations: from emission to inhalation. RSC Adv. 9(34):19606–19612. doi: 10.1039/c9ra03248g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu KP, Yang KR, Chen YC, Gong JY, Chen YP, Shih HC, Lung SC. 2015. Indoor air pollution from gas cooking in five Taiwanese families. Build Environ. 93:258–266. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Zhu L, Li Z, Wang S, Shi J, Tang W, Li N, Yang J. 2021. The recent development of vat photopolymerization: a review. Addit Manuf. 48:102423. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Pardo M, Rudich Y, Kaplan-Ashiri I, Wong JPS, Davis AY, Black MS, Weber RJ. 2019. Chemical composition and toxicity of particles emitted from a consumer-level 3D printer using various materials. Environ Sci Technol. 53(20):12054–12061. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Weber RJ, Luxton TP, Peloquin DM, Baumann EJ, Black MS. 2023. Metal compositions of particle emissions from material extrusion 3D printing: emission sources and indoor exposure modeling. Sci Total Environ. 860:160512. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Wong JPS, Davis AY, Black MS, Weber RJ. 2017. Characterization of particle emissions from consumer fused deposition modeling 3D printers. Aerosol Sci Technol. 51(11):1275–1286. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2017.1342029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zisook RE, Simmons BD, Vater M, Perez A, Donovan EP, Paustenbach DJ, Cyrs WD. 2020. Emissions associated with operations of four different additive manufacturing or 3D printing technologies. J Occup Environ Hyg. 17(10):464–479. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2020.1798012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zontek TL, Ogle BR, Jankovic JT, Hollenbeck SM. 2017. An exposure assessment of desktop 3D printing. J Chem Health Saf. 24(2):15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jchas.2016.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar