Capturing Luminous Flux Entering Human Eyes with a Camera, Part 1: Fundamentals

References

• Aguirre GK. 2019. A model of the entrance pupil of the human eye. Sci Rep. 9(1):9360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ashdown I, Eng P. 1998. The virtual photometer: modeling the flow of light. IESNA Annual Conference Technical Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Atchison DA, Girgenti CC, Campbell GM, Dodds JP, Byrnes TM, Zele AJ. 2011. Influence of field size on pupil diameter under photopic and mesopic light levels. Clin Exp Optometry. 94(6):545–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchison DA, Smith G. 2000. Optics of the human eye. Oxford; Butterworth Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow JRB, Verrillo RT. 1976. Brightness sensation in a ganzfeld. Vision Res. 16(11):1291–1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boff KR, Lincoln JE. 1988. Engineering data compendium: human perception and performance. Ohio, USA: Harry G Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR. 2014. Human factors in lighting. 3rd ed. London, UK: Crc Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cai W, Yue J, Dai Q, Hao L, Lin Y, Shi W, Huang Y, Wei M. 2018. The impact of room surface reflectance on corneal illuminance and rule-of-thumb equations for circadian lighting design. Build Environ. 141:288–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIE 018:2019. 2019. The basis of physical photometry. 3rd ed. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale De L’eclairage (CIE).
   Google Scholar
• CIE S 026/E:2018. 2018. CIE system for metrology of optical radiation for ipRGC-influenced responses to light. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale De L’eclairage (CIE).
   Google Scholar
• Cognolato M, Atzori M, Müller H. 2018. Head-mounted eye gaze tracking devices: an overview of modern devices and recent advances. J Rehabil Assistive Technol Eng. 5:2055668318773991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuttle C. 2010. Towards the third stage of the lighting profession. Light Res Technol. 42(1):73–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiLaura DL, Houser KW, Mistrick RG, Steffy GR. 2011. IES Lighting Handbook, 10th ed. New York: Reference and Application. Illumination Engineering Society. IES HB-10-11
   Google Scholar
• Doesschate JT, Alpern M. 1967. Effect of photoexcitation of the two retinas on pupil size. J Neurophysiol. 30(3):577–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff J, Antonutto G, Torres S. 2016. On the calculation and measurement of mean room surface exitance. Light Res Technol. 48(3):384–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas LG, Kolar JC, Munro IR. 1986. Geography of the nose: a morphometric study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 10(1):191–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fedtke C, Manns F, Ho A. 2010. The entrance pupil of the human eye: a three-dimensional model as a function of viewing angle. Opt Express. 18(21):22364–22376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good GW, Fogt N, Daum KM, Mitchell GL. 2005. Dynamic visual fields of one-eyed observers. Optometry-J American Optometric Assoc. 76(5):285–292.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He S, Li H, Yan Y, Cai H 2022. Capturing luminous flux entering human eyes with a camera, Part 2: a field verification experiment. Parallel submitted research.
   Google Scholar
• Iwai W, Iguchi M. 2008. New lighting evaluation techniques for comfortable lighting spaces using sensation‐of‐room‐brightness index ‘Feu.’ Matsushita Tech J. 53(2):64–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kooijman AC. 1983. Light distribution on the retina of a wide-angle theoretical eye. J Opt Soc Am. 73(11):1544–1550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacInnes JJ, Iqbal S, Pearson J, Johnson EN. 2018. Wearable eye-tracking for research: automated dynamic gaze mapping and accuracy/precision comparisons across devices. bioRxiv. 299925.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur A, Gehrmann J, Atchison DA. 2013. Pupil shape as viewed along the horizontal visual field. J Vis. 13(6):3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najjar RP, Zeitzer JM. 2016. Temporal integration of light flashes by the human circadian system. J Clin Invest. 126(3):938–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters ST, Smolders KCHJ, de Kort YAW. 2020. What you set is (not) what you get: how a light intervention in the field translates to personal light exposure. Build Environ. 185:107288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflibsen KP, Pomerantzeff O, Ross RN. 1988. Retinal illuminance using a wide-angle model of the eye. J Opt Soc Am A. 5(1):146–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinn N, Csincsik L, Flynn E, Curcio CA, Kiss S, Sadda SR, Hogg R, Peto T, Lengyel I. 2019. The clinical relevance of visualising the peripheral retina. Prog Retin Eye Res. 68:83–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao F, Chan AH, Zhu XF. 2017. Effects of photopic and cirtopic illumination on steady state pupil sizes. Vision Res. 137:24–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliney DH. 2002. How light reaches the eye and its components. Int J Toxicol. 21(6):501–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliney DH. 2005. Exposure geometry and spectral environment determine photobiological effects on the human eye. Photochem Photobiol. 81(3):483–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliney DH, Mellerio J. 2013. Safety with lasers and other optical sources: a comprehensive handbook. Springer Science & Business Media. Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley PA, Davies AK. 2010. The effect of field of view size on steady-state pupil diameter. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 15(6):601–603.
   Google Scholar
• Stidwill D, Fletcher R. 2017. Normal binocular vision: theory, investigation and practical aspects. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles WS, Crawford BH. 1933. The luminous efficiency of rays entering the eye pupil at different points. Proc R Soc London Ser B Containing Pap Biol Charact. 112(778):428–450.
   Google Scholar
• Strasburger H, Rentschler I, Jüttner M. 2011. Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review. J Vis. 11(5):146–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczęsna DH, Kasprzak HT. 2006. The modelling of the influence of a corneal geometry on the pupil image of the human eye. Optik - Int J Light and Electron Optics. 117(7):341–347.
   Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Lopez-Gil N, Bradley A. 2018. What is a troland? J Opt Soc Am A. 35(5):813–816.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley AR. 2001. The measure of man and woman: human factors in design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Troland LT. 1915. The theory and practice of the artificial pupil. Psychol Rev. 22(3):167.
   Google Scholar
• Troland LT. 1917. On the measurement of visual stimulation intensities. J Exp Psychol. 2(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Van Derlofske J, Bierman A, Rea MS, Ramanath J, Bullough JD. 2002. Design and optimization of a retinal flux density meter. Meas Sci Technol. 13(6):821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson AB, Yellott JI. 2012. A unified formula for light-adapted pupil size. J Vis. 12(10):12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westheimer G 2008. Directional sensitivity of the retina: 75 years of Stiles–Crawford effect. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 275(1653): 2777–2786.
   Google Scholar
• Williams T, Baker B. 1980. The effects of constant light on the visual process. New York: Plenum Publishing Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Winn B, Whitaker D, Elliott DB, Phillips NJ. 1994. Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 35(3):1132–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar