Optimizing Presence Sensing Lighting for Energy Efficiency and User Behavioral Needs in Small Swedish Homes

References

• Acconeer. 2019. Acconeer Pulsed Coherent Radar (PCR) Module (XM112-XB112). Acconeer. https://docs.acconeer.com/en/latest/sensor_introduction.html#welcome
   Google Scholar
• Acuity Brands. 2017. Occupancy sensor technologies: microphonics vs. ultrasonic [White Paper]. Acuity control sens switch. https://www.acuitybrands.com/-/media/Files/Acuity/Brands/Controls/SensorSwitch/occupancy.sensor.technologies.whitepaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Adib F, Mao H, Kabelac Z, Katabi D, Miller RC. 2015. Smart homes that monitor breathing and heart rate. In: Proc 33rd Annual ACM Conf Hum Factors Comput Syst (CHI ’15). New York (NY, USA): Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). p. 837–846.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad MW, Mourshed M, Mundow D, Sisinni M, Rezgui Y. 2016. Building energy metering and environmental monitoring – a state-of-the-art review and directions for future research. Energy Build. 120:85–102. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldubyan M, Krarti M. 2022. Impact of stay home living on energy demand of residential buildings: Saudi Arabian case study. Energy. 238:121637. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attia S, Hamdy M, Ezzeldin S. 2017. Twenty-year tracking of lighting savings and power density in the residential sector. Energy Build. 154:113–126. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachouch RB, Fousseret Y, Parmantier Y. 2023. Optimal sensor placement in smart home using building information modeling: a home support application. Innov Res Biomed Eng. 44(3):100745. doi:10.1016/j.irbm.2022.100745.
   Google Scholar
• Balvedi BF, Ghisi E, Lamberts R. 2018. A review of occupant behaviour in residential buildings. Energy Build. 174:495–505. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benezeth Y, Laurent H, Emile B, Rosenberger C. 2011. Towards a sensor for detecting human presence and characterizing activity. Energy Build. 43(2–3):305–314. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergefurt L, Weijs-Perrée M, Appel-Meulenbroek R, Arentze T, de Kort Y. 2022. Satisfaction with activity-support and physical home-workspace characteristics in relation to mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Environ Psychol. 81:101826. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bladh M, Krantz H. 2008. Towards a bright future? Household use of electric light: a microlevel study. Energy Policy. 36(9):3521–3530. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu Y, Mitra D, Cetin K, Lajnef N, Altay F, Velipasalar S. 2022. Development and testing of a performance evaluation methodology to assess the reliability of occupancy sensor systems in residential buildings. Energy Build. 268:112148. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covarrubias GDS. 2016. Anticipatory lighting control systems. Eindhoven (Netherlands): Eindhoven University of technology (TU/e).
   Google Scholar
• Crawford RH, Stephan A. 2020. Tiny house, tiny footprint? The potential for tiny houses to reduce residential greenhouse gas emissions. IOP Conf Series. 588, No. 2. Gothenburg (Sweden): IOP Publishing. p. 022073.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza DF, da Silva PPF, Fontenele LFA, Barbosa GD, de Oliveira Jesus M. 2019. Efficiency, quality, and environmental impacts: a comparative study of residential artificial lighting. Energy Rep. 5:409–424. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2019.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debes C, Merentitis A, Sukhanov S, Niessen M, Frangiadakis N, Bauer A. 2016. Monitoring activities of daily living in smart homes: understanding human behavior. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 33(2):81–94. doi:10.1109/MSP.2015.2503881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikel EE, Li YE, Vuotari M, Mancini S. 2019. Evaluating the standby power consumption of smart LED bulbs. Energy Build. 186:71–79. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikel EE, Newsham GR, Xue H, Valdés JJ. 2018. Potential energy savings from high-resolution sensor controls for LED lighting. Energy Build. 158:43–53. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong B, Kjærgaard MB, De Simone M, Gunay HB, O’Brien W, Mora D, Dziedzic J, Zhao J. 2018. Sensing and data acquisition. In: Wagner A, O’Brien W, Dong B, editors. Explor Occupant Behav Build Methods Challenges. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing. p. 77–106.
   Google Scholar
• Energimyndigheten. 2011. The Swedish Energy Agency’s guide to the new light. Stockholm. http://www.energimyndigheten.se/globalassets/webb-en/belysning_engelska.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Enongene KE, Murray P, Holland J, Abanda FH. 2017. Energy savings and economic benefits of transition towards efficient lighting in residential buildings in Cameroon. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 78(April):731–742. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.068.
   Google Scholar
• Extronic Elektronik AB. För belysningskonsulter och installatörer. Extronic Elektron AB. www.extronic.se
   Google Scholar
• Fioranelli F, Le Kernec J, Shah SA. 2019. Radar for health care: recognizing human activities and monitoring vital signs. IEEE Potentials. 38(4):16–23. doi:10.1109/MPOT.2019.2906977.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia M, Lau EK, Lovald ST, Chang E. 2019. Ultrasound in consumer products: perception and safety assessment. In: Thought Leadersh. San Francisco (USA): Exponent. p. 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Gerhardsson KM, Laike T, Johansson M. 2019. Residents’ lamp purchasing behaviour, indoor lighting characteristics and choices in Swedish homes. Indoor Built Environ. 28(7):964–983. doi:10.1177/1420326X18808338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhardsson KM, Laike T, Johansson M. 2021. Leaving lights on – a conscious choice or wasted light? Use of indoor lighting in Swedish homes. Indoor Built Environ. 30(6):745–762. doi:10.1177/1420326X20908644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo H, Zhang N, Shi W, AlQarni S, Wu S, Wang H 2019. Real-time indoor 3D human imaging based on MIMO radar sensing. In: 2019 IEEE Int Conf Multimed Expo. Shanghai (China): IEEE. p. 1408–1413.
   Google Scholar
• Hayat H, Griffiths T, Brennan D, Lewis RP, Barclay M, Weirman C, Philip B, Searle JR. 2019. The state-of-the-art of sensors and environmental monitoring technologies in buildings. Sensors. 19(17):3648. doi:10.3390/s19173648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houser KW. 2022. To measure is to know … or not. LEUKOS. 18(2):103. doi:10.1080/15502724.2022.2029086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain Z, Sheng QZ, Zhang WE. 2020. A review and categorization of techniques on device-free human activity recognition. J Netw Comput Appl. 167:102738. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihara I. 2008. Ultrasonic sensing: fundamentals and its applications to nondestructive evaluation. In: Mukhopadhyay S, Huang R, editors. Sensors. Vol. 21. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer. p. 287–305.
   Google Scholar
• Javaid M, Haleem A, Rab S, Pratap Singh R, Suman R. 2021. Sensors for daily life: a review. Sensors Int. 2:100121. doi:10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100121.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyanaraman A, Soltanaghaei E, Whitehouse K 2019. Doorpler: a radar-based system for real-time, low power zone occupancy sensing. In: 2019 IEEE Real-Time Embed Technol Appl Symp. Montreal (QC, Canada): IEEE. p. 42–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kawka E, Cetin K. 2021. Impacts of COVID-19 on residential building energy use and performance. Build Environ. 205:108200. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas J. 2019. What are microwaves? Live Sci. https://www.livescience.com/50259-microwaves.html
   Google Scholar
• McLean G, Osei-Frimpong K. 2019. Hey Alexa … examine the variables influencing the use of artificial intelligent in-home voice assistants. Comput Human Behav. 99:28–37. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moadab NH, Olsson T, Fischl G, Aries MBC. 2021. Smart versus conventional lighting in apartments - electric lighting energy consumption simulation for three different households. Energy Build. 244:111009. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. 2018. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. In: Payne H, Koch S, Tantia, J, Fuchs, T, editors. BMC Med Res Methodol. Vol. 18. p. 143.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro RC, Ruiz AR, Molina FJV, Romero MJS, Chaparro JD, Alises DV, Lopez JCL. 2022. Indoor occupancy estimation for smart utilities: a novel approach based on depth sensors. Build Environ. 222:109406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TA, Aiello M. 2013. Energy intelligent buildings based on user activity: a survey. Energy Build. 56:244–257. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onaygil S, Erkin E 2018. Smart lighting solutions for residences using IoT infrastructure: advantages, disadvantages and effects on energy saving. In: 2018 Seventh Balk Conf Light. Varna (Bulgaria): IEEE. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Palacios-Garcia EJ, Chen A, Santiago I, Bellido-Outeiriño FJ, Flores-Arias JM, Moreno-Munoz A. 2015. Stochastic model for lighting’s electricity consumption in the residential sector: impact of energy saving actions. Energy Build. 89:245–259. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.12.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandharipande A, Caicedo D. 2015. Smart indoor lighting systems with luminaire-based sensing: a review of lighting control approaches. Energy Build. 104:369–377. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandharipande A, Newsham GR. 2018. Lighting controls: evolution and revolution. Light Res Technol. 50(1):115–128. doi:10.1177/1477153517731909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompei L, Blaso L, Fumagalli S, Bisegna F. 2022. The impact of key parameters on the energy requirements for artificial lighting in Italian buildings based on standard EN 15193-1:2017. Energy Build. 263:112025. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. 2021. PRISMA. http://prisma-statement.org/Extensions/ScopingReviews
   Google Scholar
• Reinoso O, Payá L. 2020. Special issue on visual sensors. Sensors. 20(3):910. doi:10.3390/s20030910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safranek S, Wilkerson A, Irvin L, Casey C. 2021. Using occupant interaction with advanced lighting systems to understand opportunities for energy optimization: control data from a hospital NICU. Energy Build. 251:111357. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santra A, Ulaganathan RV, Finke T. 2018. Short-range millimetric-wave radar system for occupancy sensing application. IEEE Sensors Lett. 2(3):1–4. doi:10.1109/LSENS.2018.2852263.
   Google Scholar
• Sciuto A, Saini A, Forlizzi J, Hong JI. 2018. “Hey Alexa, what’s up?”: a mixed-methods studies of in-home conversational agent usage. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. New York (NY, USA): Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). p. 857–868.
   Google Scholar
• Shukri S, Kamarudin LM. 2017. Device free localization technology for human detection and counting with RF sensor networks: a review. J Netw Comput Appl. 97:157–174. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2017.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soheilian M, Moadab NH, Fischl G, Aries MBC. 2019. Comparison of simulated energy consumption by smart and conventional lighting systems in a residential setting. J Phys Conf Ser. 1343(1):012155. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1343/1/012155.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2021a. Electricity in Sweden. Stat Sweden. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1027084/consumption-of-electricity-in-sweden-by-user/
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2021b. Households’ housing 2020: smallest living space per person in cities. Stat Sweden. https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/household-finances/income-and-income-distribution/households-housing/pong/statistical-news/households-housing-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Thorström M, Anderson G. 2020. Presence detectors and remote heartbeat sensing using radar technology. Lund (Sweden): Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Ticleanu C. 2021. Impacts of home lighting on human health. Light Res Technol. 53(5):453–475. doi:10.1177/14771535211021064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiller D, Guo X, Henze G, Waters C. 2010. Validating the application of occupancy sensor networks for lighting control. Light Res Technol. 42(4):399–414. doi:10.1177/1477153510375524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tleuken A, Turkyilmaz A, Sovetbek M, Durdyev S, Guney M, Tokazhanov G, Wiechetek L, Pastuszak Z, Draghici A, Boatca ME, et al. 2022. Effects of the residential built environment on remote work productivity and satisfaction during COVID-19 lockdowns: an analysis of workers’ perceptions. Build Environ. 219:109234. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, et al. 2018. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 169(7):467–473. doi:10.7326/M18-0850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eck NJ, Waltman L. 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 84(2):523–538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A, Atkinson B, Garbesi K, Page E, Rubinstein F. 2012. Lighting controls in commercial buildings. LEUKOS. 8(3):161–180. doi:10.1582/LEUKOS.2012.08.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson L. 2022. How big is a house? Average house size by country - 2022. Shrink That Footpr. https://shrinkthatfootprint.com/how-big-is-a-house/
   Google Scholar
• Woodstock T-KAE. 2020. Multisensor fusion for occupancy detection and activity recognition in a smart room. Troy (New York): Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wotton J, Skates H, Shutter L. 2018. Tiny house – when size matters. Aust Plan. 55(3–4):209–220. doi:10.1080/07293682.2019.1634112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Wang Y. 2021. Stationary and moving occupancy detection using the SLEEPIR sensor module and machine learning. IEEE Sens J. 21(13):14701–14708. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2021.3071402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavari E, Lee A, Pang K, Mccabe NA, Boric-Lubecke O 2014a. Radar and conventional occupancy sensors performance comparison. In: 2014 Asia-Pacific Microw Conf.; Sendai, Japan. p. 444–446.
   Google Scholar
• Yavari E, Song C, Lubecke V, Boric-Lubecke O. 2014b. Is there anybody in there? IEEE Microw Mag. 15(2):57–64. doi:10.1109/MMM.2013.2296210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Bai X, Mills FP, Pezzey JCV. 2018. Rethinking the role of occupant behavior in building energy performance: a review. Energy Build. 172:279–294. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar