The Use of Virtual Screens in Perceptual Studies on Electric Light: A Comparison Between 2D, Panoramic, Cardboard, and Head-Mounted Displays

References

• Abd-Alhamidab F, Kent M, Bennetta C, Calautita J, Wu Y. 2019. Developing an innovative method for visual perception evaluation in a physical-based virtual environment. Build Environ. 162:106278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyuz AO, Fleming RW, Riecke BE, Reinhard E, Bülthoff HH. 2007. Do HDR displays support LDR content?: a psychophysical evaluation. ACM Trans Graph. 26(3):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezmalinovic T. 2022 May 19. Meta Quest 2: how far the display is from retinal resolution. Mixed News. [accessed 2023 Mar 24]. https://mixed-news.com/en/meta-quest-2-how-far-the-display-is-from-retina-resolution/.
   Google Scholar
• Chamilothori K, Wienold J, Andersen M. 2018. Adequacy of immersive virtual reality for the perception of daylit spaces: comparison of real and virtual environments. LEUKOS. 15(2):203–226. 2019. doi:10.1080/15502724.2017.1404918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Cui Z, Hao L. 2019. Virtual reality in lighting research: comparing physical and virtual lighting environments. Light Res Technol. 51(6):820–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York (NY): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Engelke U, Stokkermans M, Murdoch M. 2013. Visualizing lighting with images: converging between the predictive value of renderings and photographs. Proceedings of SPIE 8651; San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Heydarian A, Pantazis E, Carneiro J, Gerber D. 2015. Towards understanding end-user lighting preferences in office spaces by using immersive virtual environments. ASCE International Workshop Computing in Civil Engineering; 2015 Jun 21-23; TX. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Higuera-Trujillo JL, Maldonado JLT, Millan CL. 2017. Psychological and physiological human responses to simulated and real environments: a comparison between photographs, 360 panoramas, and virtual reality. Appl Ergon. 65:398–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inanici M. 2006. Evaluation of high dynamic range photography as a luminance data acquisition system. Light Res Technol. 38(2):123–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jevard P, Mullins M. 2019. The use of VR technologies to enhance methods for lighting design practice. 7th eCAADe Regional International Symposium; 2019 May 2-3; Aalborg, Denmark. p. 97–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kim CK. 2022. High-PPI fast-switch display development for oculus quest 2 VR headsets [conference presentation]. Display Week, annual conference of the Society for Information Display (SID); May 8-13; San Jose, CA, United States. https://www.displayweek.org/
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzberg A. 2018. Visualizing architectural lighting concept with 360-degree panoramas. Proceedings of the 36th eCAADe Conference; Lodz, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Kuliga SF, Thrash T, Dalton RC, Holscher C. 2015. Virtual reality as an empirical research tool – exploring user experience in a real building and a corresponding virtual model. Comput Environ Urban. 54:363–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kus B. 2019. A comparative study on spatial perception in real and virtual office environments under different lighting conditions [ Master’s Thesis]. Ankara: Bilkent University.
   Google Scholar
• Moscoso C, Chamilothori K, Wienold J, Andersen M, Matusiak B. 2021. Window size effects on subjective impressions of daylit spaces: indoor studies at high latitudes using virtual reality. LEUKOS. 17(3):242–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscoso C, Chamilothori K, Wienold J, Andersen M, Matusiak B. 2022. Regional differences in the perception of daylit scenes across Europe using virtual reality. Part I: effects of window size. LEUKOS. 18(3):294–315. doi:10.1080/15502724.2020.1854779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch M, Stokkermans M, Lambooij M. 2015. Towards perceptual accuracy in 3D visualizations of illuminated indoor environments. J Sol State Light. 2(1):1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ozhen DS, Afacan Y, Surer E. 2019. Usability of virtual reality for basic design education: a comparative study with paper-based design. Int J Des Educ. 31:357–377. doi:10.1007/s10798-019-09554-0.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhard C, Stark M, Shirley P, Ferwerda J. 2002. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. Proceedings to SIGGRAPH ’02; 2002 Jul 21-26; San Antonio, USA. p. 267–276.
   Google Scholar
• Rockcastle S, Chamilothori K, Andersen M. 2017. An experiment in virtual reality to measure daylight-driven interest in rendered architectural scenes. Building Simulation 2017; 2017 Sep 2-4; San Francisco, USA. p. 2797–2806.
   Google Scholar
• Rockcastle S, Danell M, Calabrese E, Sollom-Brotherton G, Mahic A, Van Den Wymelenberg K, Davis R. 2021. Comparing perceptions of a dimmable LED lighting system between a real space and a virtual reality display. Light Res Technol. 53(8):207–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockcastle S, Whalen G, Davis R. 2022. Comparing perceptions of web-based 2D perspective and 360-degree navigable images with measurements from a physical space and a virtual reality headset; IES Annual Conference 2022; 2022 Aug 18-20; New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Salters B, Murdoch M, Sekulovski D, Chen S-H, Seuntiens P. 2012. An evaluation of different setups for simulating lighting characteristics. Proceedings to SPIE 8291, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XVII, Burlingame, California.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer A, Chamilothori K. 2019. Influence of subjective impressions of a space on brightness satisfaction: an experimental study in virtual reality. SimAUD 2019; 2019 Apr 7-9; Atlanta, USA. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 52(3–4):591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttley J. 2019. Power analysis, sample size, and assessment of statistical assumptions—improving the evidential value of lighting research. LEUKOS. 15(2–3):143–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa C, Labayrade R. 2013. Validation of an online protocol for assessing the luminous environment. Light Res Technol. 45(4):401–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward G, Rushmeier H, Piatko C. 1997. A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes. San Francisco: Lawrence Berkely National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar