Effects of Temporal Light Modulation on Individuals Sensitive to Pattern Glare

References

• Brown E, Foulsham T, Lee C-S, Wilkins A. 2020. Research note: visibility of temporal light artefact from flicker at 11 kHz. Light Res Technol. 52(3):371–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundrett GW. 1974. Human sensitivity to flicker. Light Res Technol. 6(3):127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough JD, Marcus D. 2016. Influence of flicker characteristics on stroboscopic effects. Light Res Technol. 48(7):857–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullough JD, Sweater Hickcox K, Klein TR, Narendran N. 2011. Effects of flicker characteristics from solid-state lighting on detection, acceptability and comfort. Light Res Technol. 43(3):337–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE). 2017. Final report CIE stakeholder workshop for temporal light modulation standards for lighting systems. No. CIE TN 008:2017. Vienna, Austria: CIE.
   Google Scholar
• Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE). 2021. Guidance on the measurement of temporal light modulation of lighting systems. No. CIE TN 012:2021. Vienna, Austria: CIE.
   Google Scholar
• Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE). 2022. Visual aspects of time-modulated lighting systems. No. CIE 249:2022. Vienna, Austria: CIE.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman AA, Campbell JH. 1952. Stroboscopic and flicker effects from fluorescent lamps. Illum Eng. 47(1):27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Evans BJW, Stevenson SJ. 2008. The pattern glare test: a review and determination of normative values. Ophthal Physl Opt. 28(4):295–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harle DE, Shepherd AJ, Evans BJW. 2006. Visual stimuli are common triggers of migraine and are associated with pattern glare. Headache. 46(9):1431–1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEEE Power Electronics Society. 2015. IEEE recommended practices for modulating current in high-brightness LEDs for mitigating health risks to viewers. No. S1789-2015. New York, NY: Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE).
   Google Scholar
• Illuminating Engineering Society (IES). 2020. Measuring luminous flux waveforms for use in temporal light artifact (TLA) calculations. No. ANSI/IES LM-90-20. New York.
   Google Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). 2017. Equipment for general lighting purposes - EMC immunity requirements - part 1: an objective light flickermeter and voltage fluctuation immunity test method. No. IEC TR 61547-1:2017. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC.
   Google Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). 2018. Equipment for general lighting purposes - objective test method for stroboscopic effects of lighting equipment. No. IEC TR 63158:2018. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC.
   Google Scholar
• Kang HR, Lee CS, Lee JM, Lee KM. 2023. Phantom array effect can be observed above 15 kHz in high speed eye movement group for high luminance warm white LED. Light Res Technol. 14771535221147312. 147715352211473. doi:10.1177/14771535221147312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keystone View. 1969. The keystone visual skills tests. Reno, NV, USA: Mast Concepts.
   Google Scholar
• Küller R, Laike T. 1998. The impact of flicker from fluorescent lighting on well-being, performance, and physiological arousal. Ergonomics. 41(4):433–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller NJ, Rodriguez-Feo Bermudez E, Irvin L, Tan J. 2023. Phantom array and stroboscopic effect visibility under combinations of TLM parameters. Light Res Technol. 14771535231169904. doi:10.1177/14771535231169904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) Lighting Systems Division. 2015. Temporal light artifacts (flicker and stroboscopic effects). Rosslyn, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association.
   Google Scholar
• National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) Lighting Systems Division. 2017. Standard for temporal light artifacts: test methods and guidance for acceptance criteria. No. NEMA 77-2017. Rosslyn, VA: NEMA.
   Google Scholar
• Newsham GR, Veitch JA, Arsenault CD, Duval CL 2004. Effect of dimming control on office worker satisfaction and performance. Proceedings of the IESNA Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, July 26-28, 2004; New York: IESNA. p. 19–41.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson Tengelin M, Källberg S, Jarlemark P 2017. Efffects of non-visual optical flicker in an office with two different light sources. Proceedings of the Conference “Smarter Lighting for Better Life” at the CIE Midterm Meeting 2017, October 23-25, 2017, Jeju, South Korea; Vienna, Austria: CIE. p. 468–476.
   Google Scholar
• Perenboom MJL, Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, Zielman R, Carpay JA, Ferrari MD. 2018. Quantifying visual allodynia across migraine subtypes: the leiden visual sensitivity scale. PAIN. 159(11):2375–2382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perz M, Sekulovski D, Vogels IMLC, Heynderickx IEJ. 2017. Quantifying the visibility of periodic flicker. LEUKOS. 13(3):127–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perz M, Vogels IMLC, Sekulovski D, Wang LL, Tu Y, Heynderickx IEJ. 2015. Modeling the visibility of the stroboscopic effect occurring in temporally modulated light systems. Light Res Technol. 47(3):281–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts JE, Wilkins AJ. 2013. Flicker can be perceived during saccades at frequencies in excess of 1 kHz. Light Res Technol. 45(1):124–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer M. 2020. Editorial: visual diversity and equity in lighting. Light Res Technol. 52(6):701–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekulovski D, Poort S, Perz M, Waumans L. 2020. Effects of long-term exposure to stroboscopic effect from moderate-level modulated light. Light Res Technol. 52(6):775–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smitherman TA, Burch R, Sheikh H, Loder E. 2013. The prevalence, impact, and treatment of migraine and severe headaches in the United States: a review of statistics from national surveillance studies. Headache. 53(3):427–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone PT. 1992. Fluorescent lighting and health. Light Res Technol. 24(2):55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Stroop JR. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 18(6):643–662.
   Google Scholar
• Veitch JA 2019. Cognitive and eye movement effects on viewers of temporal light modulation from solid-state lighting. Proceedings of the 29th CIE Quadrennial Session, June 16-22, Washington, D.C., USA; Vienna, Austria: Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. p. 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Gifford R. 1996. Assessing beliefs about lighting effects on health, performance, mood, and social behavior. Environ Behav. 28(4):446–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Martinsons C. 2020. Detection of the stroboscopic effect by young adults varying in sensitivity. Light Res Technol. 52(6):790–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Martinsons C, Coyne S, Dam-Hansen C. 2021. Correspondence: on the state of knowledge concerning the effects of temporal light modulation. Light Res Technol. 53(1):89–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, McColl SL. 1995. Modulation of fluorescent light: flicker rate and light source effects on visual performance and visual comfort. Light Res Technol. 27(4):243–256.
   Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Newsham GR. 1998. Lighting quality and energy-efficiency effects on task performance, mood, health, satisfaction and comfort. J Illum Eng Soc. 27(1):107–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Tiller DK, Pasini IC, Arsenault CD, Jaekel RR, Svec JM. 2002. The effects of fluorescent lighting filters on skin appearance and visual performance. J Illum Eng Soc. 31(1):40–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Van Roon P, D’Angiulli A, Wilkins A, Lehman B, Burns GJ, Dikel EE. 2023. Effects of temporal light modulation on cognitive performance, eye movements, and brain function. LEUKOS. online early(1):1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Vogels IM, Sekulovski D, Perz M 2011. Visible artefacts of LEDs. Proceedings of the 27th Session of the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage, Sun City, South Africa, 10-15 July 2011; Vienna, Austria: CIE. p. 42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Wang LL, Tu Y, Cheng SL, Yu XL, Perz M, Sekulovski D 2019. The visibility of the phantom array effect under office lighting condition. Proceedings of the 29th CIE Quadrennial Session, June 16-22, Washington, D.C., USA; Vienna, Austria: Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. p. 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins AJ. 1986. Intermittent illumination from visual display units and fluorescent lighting affects movement of the eyes across text. Hum Factors. 28(1):75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins AJ. 1995. Visual stress. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins AJ. 2016. A physiological basis for visual discomfort: application in lighting design. Light Res Technol. 48(1):44–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins AJ, Allen PM, Monger LJ, Gilchrist JM. 2016. Visual stress and dyslexia for the practicing optometrist. Optom Pract. 17(2):103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins AJ, Evans BJW. 2012. I.O.O. Pattern glare test. London, UK: i.O.O Sales Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins AJ, Jeanes RJ, Pumfrey PD, Laskier M. 1996. Rate of reading test: its reliability, and its validity in the assessment of the effects of coloured overlays. Ophthal Physl Opt. 16(6):491–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins AJ, Nimmo-Smith I, Slater AI, Bedocs L. 1989. Fluorescent lighting, headaches and eyestrain. Light Res Technol. 21(1):11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Hou D, Lin Y, Xu W. 2020. The effect of stroboscopic effect on human health indicators. Light Res Technol. 52(3):389–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar