Comparison of low dose and standard dose abdominal CT scan in body stuffers

References

• Bulakci M, Kalelioglu T, Bulakci BB, et al. Comparison of diagnostic value of multidetector computed tomography and X-ray in the detection of body packing. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:1248–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Püschel K, Stein S, Stobbe S, et al. Analysis of 683 drug packages seized from “body stuffers”. Forensic Sci Int. 2004;140:109–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• June R, Aks SE, Keys N, et al. Medical outcome of cocaine body stuffers. J Emerg Med. 2000;18:221–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt S, Hugli O, Rizzo E, et al. Detection of ingested cocaine-filled packets—diagnostic value of unenhanced CT. Eur J Radiol. 2008;67:133–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flach PM, Ross SG, Ampanozi G, et al. “Drug mules” as a radiological challenge: sensitivity and specificity in identifying internal cocaine in body packers, body pushers and body stuffers by computed tomography, plain radiography and Lodox. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:2518–2526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marc BR. Managing high-risk body-stuffers who swallow the evidence. J Forensic Leg Med. 2008;15:200–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollack CV, Biggers DW, Carlton FB, et al. Two crack cocaine body stuffers. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:1370–1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hergan K, Kofler K, Oser W. Drug smuggling by body packing: what radiologists should know about it. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:736–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cengel F, Bulakci M, Selcuk T, et al. The role of ultrasonography in the imaging of body packers comparison with CT: a prospective study. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:2143–2151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shahnazi M, Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Gachkar L, et al. Comparison of abdominal computed tomography with and without oral contrast in diagnosis of body packers and body stuffers. Clin Toxicol. 2015;53:596–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrami-Motlagh H, Vakilian F, Hassanian-Moghaddam H, et al. Added value of lung window in detecting drug mules on non-contrast abdominal computed tomography. Radiol Med. 2016;121:472–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta A, Page P. Window manipulation in diagnosis of body packing using computed tomography. Emerg Radiol. 2008;15:203–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eng JG, Aks SE, Waldron R, et al. False-negative abdominal CT scan in a cocaine body stuffer. Am J Emerg Med. 1999;17:702–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyzer C, Tack D, De Maertelaer V, et al. Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2004;232:164–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo H, Lee KH, Kim HJ, et al. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sliding slab ray-sum interpretation of low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose iv contrast-enhanced CT scans. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:96–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT, et al. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:927–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poletti PA, Canel L, Becker CD, et al. Screening of illegal intracorporeal containers (“body packing”): is abdominal radiography sufficiently accurate? A comparative study with low-dose CT. Radiology. 2012;265:772–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aissa J, Rubbert C, Boos J, et al. Low-tube voltage 100 kVp MDCT in screening of cocaine body packing: image quality and radiation dose compared to 120 kVp MDCT. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:2152–2158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fornaro J, Leschka S, Hibbeln D, et al. Low dose dual-energy computed tomography in suspected body packers and body stuffers—preliminary clinical experience. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2013;1:83.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Zamani N, Rahimi M, et al. Acute adult and adolescent poisoning in Tehran, Iran; the epidemiologic trend between 2006 and 2011. Arch Iran Med. 2014;17:534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanian-Moghaddam H. An educational and research opportunity for the largest university hospital poison control centers; Tehran and Cairo. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2013;2:64–65.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College. The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. Report No. 96. Park; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Shahnazi M, Taheri MS, Pourghorban R. Body packing and its radiologic manifestations: a review article. Iran J Radiol. 2011;8:205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto RR, Seminerio MJ, Turner RC, et al. Methamphetamine-induced toxicity: an updated review on issues related to hyperthermia. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;144:28–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira M, Buchanan J, Heard K. Validation of a 6-hour observation period for cocaine body stuffers. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29:299–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Booker RJ, Smith JE, Rodger MP. Packers, pushers and stuffers—managing patients with concealed drugs in UK emergency departments: a clinical and medicolegal review. Emerg Med J. 2009;26:316–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrami-Motlagh H, Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Behnam B, et al. Failure of surgical treatment in methamphetamine body-stuffers. J Forensic Legal Med. 2015;32:70–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer MH, Niehues SM, Schnapauff D, et al. Low-dose computed tomography to detect body-packing in an animal model. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78:302–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabani M, Zamani N, Hassanian-Moghaddam H. Endoscopic retrieval of baggies in body stuffers. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E443–E445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakaura T, Kidoh M, Nakamura S, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT protocols with a tube voltage setting of 100 kVp or 80 kVp: performance of radiation dose reduction and influence on visual contrast. Clin Radiol. 2014;69:804–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar