A comprehensive investigation of a solar array with wire length under partial shading conditions

References

• Aljafari, B., P. Ranjan, and S. Babu. 2022. Partial shading mitigation in PV arrays through dragon fly algorithm based dynamic reconfiguration. Energy 257:124795–813. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.124795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljafari, B., P. R. Satpathy, S. T. Babu, and H. H. Alhelou. 2023. A zero switch and sensorless reconfiguration approach for sustainable operation of roof-top photovoltaic system during partial shading. IET Renewable Power Generation 1–28 (6):1385–412. doi:10.1049/rpg2.12683.
   Google Scholar
• Anjum, S., and V. Mukherjee. 2022. A novel arithmetic sequence pattern reconfiguration technique for line loss reduction of photovoltaic array under non-uniform irradiance. Journal of Cleaner Production 331:129822–51. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anjum, S., V. Mukherjee, and G. Mehta. 2022. Hyper SuDoKu-based solar photovoltaic array reconfiguration for maximum power enhancement under partial shading conditions. Journal of Energy Resources Technology 144 (3):1–15. doi:10.1115/1.4051427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouselham, L., A. Rabhi, B. Hajji, and A. Mellit. 2021. Photovoltaic array reconfiguration method based on fuzzy logic and recursive least squares: An experimental validation. Energy 232:121107–24. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavan, V. C., and S. Mikkili. 2021. Effect of PV array positioning on mismatch and wiring losses in static array reconfiguration effect of PV array positioning on mismatch and wiring losses in static array. IETE Journal of Research 2021:1–13. doi:10.1080/03772063.2021.1945957.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X., F. Deng, G. Wu, Q. Pan, C. Zheng, W. Wang, T. Cai, and L. Jiang. 2023. Divide and conquer Q-Learning (DCQL) algorithm based Photovoltaic (PV) array reconfiguration scheme for alleviating the partial shading influence. Solar Energy 249:21–39. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2022.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., F. Deng, H. Zheng, N. Ding, Z. Ye, Y. Cai, and X. Wang. 2021. Followed the Regularized Leader (FTRL) prediction model based photovoltaic array reconfiguration for mitigation of mismatch losses in partial shading condition. IET Renewable Power Generation 16 (1):1–18. doi:10.1049/rpg2.12275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir, E., P. Kumar, S. Kumar, A. A. Adelodun, and K. H. Kim. 2018. Solar energy: Potential and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82:894–900. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, E., M. Avudaiappan, S. Kaliyaperumal, S. Muthusamy, H. Panchal, S. Pandiyan, and A. Azhaganantham. 2022. A novel strategy for implementation of intelligent techniques in solar photovoltaic arrays to improve the performance and various comparison of partial shading mitigating techniques. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, & Environmental Effects 44 (2):3079–99. doi:10.1080/15567036.2022.2060381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, V. R., F. Blaabjerg, A. Sangwongwanich, and R. Natarajan. 2022. Twisted two-step arrangement for maximum power extraction from a partially shaded PV array. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 12 (3):871–79. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2022.3143456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., M. Rizwan, U. Nangia, and M. Alaraj. 2021. Grey wolf optimizer-based array reconfiguration to enhance power production from solar photovoltaic plants under different scenarios. Sustainability 13 (24):1–18. doi:10.3390/su132413627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjunath, H. N. Suresh, and S. Rajanna. 2020. Reduction of mislead power and mismatch power loss under partial shading conditions using novel square matrix shade dispersion technique. Solar Energy 207:1364–83. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2020.07.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerimatha, G., and B. L. Rao. 2020. Novel reconfiguration approach to reduce line losses of the photovoltaic array under various shading conditions. Energy 196:117120–38. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, V. L., Y. K. Chauhan, and K. S. Verma. 2022a. A critical review on advanced reconfigured models and metaheuristics-based MPPT to address complex shadings of solar array. Energy Conversion and Management 269:116099. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, V. L., Y. K. Chauhan, and K. S. Verma. 2022b. A novel PV array reconfiguration approach to mitigate non-uniform irradiation effect. Energy Conversion and Management 265:115728. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, V. L., Y. K. Chauhan, and K. S. Verma. 2023a. A new physics-based solar reconfigured model to enhance efficiency under partial shading conditions: Experimental feasibility. International Journal of Green Energy 1:1–36. doi:10.1080/15435075.2023.2201620.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, V. L., Y. K. Chauhan, and K. S. Verma. 2023b. Various modeling approaches of photovoltaic module: A comparative analysis. Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering 17 (2):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammad, A., V. K. Ramachandaramurthy, A. Naderipour, and J. B. Ekanayake. 2021. Comparative analysis of two-step GA-based PV array reconfiguration technique and other reconfiguration techniques. Energy Conversion and Management 230:113806–27. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik, K. A., R. D. A. Raj, C. V. Rao, and T. S. Babu. 2022. Generalized cryptographic image processing approaches using integer-series transformation for solar power optimization under partial shading. Energy Conversion and Management 272:116376–96. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanaswamy, V., R. Ayyanar, C. Tepedelenlioglu, D. Srinivasan, and A. Spanias. 2023. Optimizing solar power using array topology reconfiguration with regularized deep neural networks. IEEE Access 11:7461–70. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3238400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen-Duc, T., T. Le-Viet, D. Nguyen-Dang, T. Dao-Quang, and M. Bui-Quang. 2022. Photovoltaic array reconfiguration under partial shading conditions based on short-circuit current estimated by convolutional neural networks. Energies 15 (17):6341–62. doi:10.3390/en15176341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nihanth, M. S. S., J. P. Ram, D. S. Pillai, A. M. Y. M. Ghias, A. Garg, and N. Rajasekar. 2019. Enhanced power production in PV arrays using a new skyscraper puzzle based one-time reconfiguration procedure under partial shade conditions (PSCs). Solar Energy 194:209–24. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, J., J. Dodson, S. Fiechter, T. M. Gür, B. Kennedy, W. Macyk, T. Bak, W. Sigmund, M. Yamawaki, and K. A. Rahman. 2018. Towards global sustainability: Education on environmentally clean energy technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81:2541–51. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachauri, R. K., S. K. Thanikanti, J. Bai, V. K. Yadav, B. Aljafari, S. Ghosh, and H. H. Alhelou. 2021. Ancient Chinese magic square-based PV array reconfiguration methodology to reduce power loss under partial shading conditions. Energy Conversion and Management 253:115148–72. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappachan, S. N. 2022. Hybrid red deer with moth flame optimization for reconfiguration process on partially shaded photovoltaic array. Energy Sources, Part A Recovery Utilization Environmental Effects 1–27. doi:10.1080/15567036.2022.2029626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillai, D. S., J. P. Ram, V. Shabunko, and Y. J. Kim. 2021. A new shade dispersion technique compatible for symmetrical and unsymmetrical photovoltaic (PV) arrays. Energy 225:120241. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajani, K., T. Ramesh, T. Ramesh, and K. Rajani. 2022. Impact of wiring resistance on PV array configurations in harvesting the maximum power under static and dynamic shading conditions. IETE Journal of Research 2022:1–29. doi:10.1080/03772063.2022.2130454.
   Google Scholar
• Raj, R. D. A., and K. A. Naik. 2023. Novel shade dispersion techniques for reconfiguration of partially shaded photovoltaic arrays. Smart Grids and Sustainable Energy 8 (1):2023. doi:10.1007/s40866-023-00163-4.
   Google Scholar
• Rakesh, N., S. Subramaniam, B. Natarajan, and M. Udugula. 2022. A non-puzzle-based interconnection scheme for energy savings and income generation from partially shaded photovoltaic modules. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, & Environmental Effects 1–19. doi:10.1080/15567036.2022.2029973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjan, P., B. Aljafari, and S. Babu. 2022. Power losses mitigation through electrical reconfiguration in partial shading prone solar PV arrays. Optik (Stuttg) 259:168973–9003. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.168973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezazadeh, S., A. Moradzadeh, S. M. Hashemzadeh, K. Pourhossein, B. M. Ivatloo, and S. H. Hosseini. 2021. A novel prime numbers-based PV array reconfiguration solution to produce maximum energy under partial shade conditions. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 47:101498–522. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezk, H., and M. A. Abdelkareem. 2022. Optimal parameter identification of triple diode model for solar photovoltaic panel and cells. Energy Reports 8:1179–88. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satpathy, P. R., T. S. Babu, A. Mahmoud, R. Sharma, and B. Nastasi. 2021. A TCT-SC hybridized voltage equalizer for partial shading mitigation in PV arrays. IEEE Transactions Sustainable Energy 12 (4):2268–81. doi:10.1109/TSTE.2021.3088687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satpathy, P. R., P. Bhowmik, T. S. Babu, C. Sain, R. Sharma, and H. H. Alhelou. 2022. Performance and reliability improvement of partially shaded PV arrays by one-time electrical reconfiguration. IEEE Access 10:46911–35. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3171107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satpathy, P. R., and R. Sharma. 2018. Power loss reduction in partially shaded PV arrays by a static SDP technique. Energy 156:569–85. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satpathy, P. R., and R. Sharma. 2019. Power and mismatch losses mitigation by a fixed electrical reconfiguration technique for partially shaded photovoltaic arrays. Energy Conversion and Management 192 (2019):52–70. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.04.039.
   Google Scholar
• Satpathy, P. R., R. Sharma, and S. Dash. 2019. An efficient SD-PAR technique for maximum power generation from modules of partially shaded PV arrays. Energy 175:182–94. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakthivel, S. K., P. W. David, S. P. Backiyam, and M. S. Murugan. 2022. Square dynamic reconfiguration for the partial shaded photovoltaic system – simulation and experimental analysis system. Energysources part arecover utilization Environmental Effects 44 (3):6868–85. doi:10.1080/15567036.2022.2103215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syahirah, N., M. Nor, Z. Itam, and W. L. Sing. 2022. Sustainable development perspectives of solar energy technologies with focus on solar photovoltaic — a review. Energies 15 (8):1–15. doi:10.3390/en15082790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanikanti, S. B., K. Izharuddin, B. Aljafari, R. K. Pachauri, and K. Balasubramanian. 2022. Power generation improvement in partially shaded series-parallel PV arrays through junction wires. IEEE India Council International Subsections Conference (INDISCON) 1:2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Vamshi, M., K. Chitti, B. Baladhandautham, and J. Chandramohan. 2022. A hybrid approach to modelling and analyzing reconfiguration of photovoltaic arrays under partial shading conditions. Electrical Engineering 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Varma, G. H. K., V. R. Barry, R. K. Jain, and D. Kumar. 2020. An MMTES algorithm for dynamic photovoltaic array reconfiguration. IET Renewable Power Generation 15 (4):809–20. doi:10.1049/rpg2.12070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles, J. 2001. Photovoltaic power systems, and the national electrical code: suggested practices. no. March.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, K., B. Kumar, and D. Swaroop. 2020. Mitigation of mismatch power losses of PV array under partial shading condition using novel odd even configuration. Energy Reports 6:427–37. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, B., R. Shao, M. Zhang, H. Ye, B. Liu, T. Bao, J. Wang, H. Shu, Y. Ren, and H. Ye. 2021. Socio-inspired democratic political algorithm for optimal PV array reconfiguration to mitigate partial shading. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 48:101627–44. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, B., M. Zhang, Z. Guo, P. Cao, J. Yang, G. He, J. Yang, R. Su, X. Huang, M. Zhu, et al. 2023. Adaptive evolutionary jellyfish search algorithm based optimal photovoltaic array reconfiguration under partial shading condition for maximum power extraction. Expert Systems with Applications 215:119325–44. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., N. Zhang, J. Wang, Y. Liu, and L. Fu. 2022. Improved non-symmetrical puzzle reconfiguration scheme for power loss reduction in photovoltaic systems under partial shading conditions. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 51:101934–51. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., C. Li, Z. Li, X. Yin, B. Yang, L. Gan, and T. Yu. 2021. Optimal mileage-based PV array reconfiguration using swarm reinforcement learning. Energy Conversion and Management 232:113892–907. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., D. Meng, W. Li, T. Yu, Z. Fan, and Z. Hao. 2022. Evolutionary based Pareto optimization algorithms for bi-objective PV array reconfiguration under partial shading conditions. Energy Conversion and Management 271:116308. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar