Effect of steam gasification parameters on hydrogen extraction from indirect land use change crops

References

• Acharya, B., A. Dutta, and P. Basu. 2010. An investigation into steam gasification of biomass for hydrogen-enriched gas production in presence of CaO. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 35 (4):1582–1589. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaedini, A. H., H. K. Tourani, and M. Saidi. 2023a. A review of waste-to-hydrogen conversion technologies for solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) applications: Aspect of gasification process and catalyst development. Journal of Environmental Management 329:117077. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaedini, A. H., H. K. Tourani, and M. Saidi. 2023b. A review of waste-to-hydrogen conversion technologies for solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) applications: Aspect of gasification process and catalyst development. Journal of Environmental Management 329:117077. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, A. M., and A. B. Mahpudz. 2023. Polygeneration syngas and power from date palm waste steam gasification through an Aspen plus process modeling. Fuel 232 (1):126120. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126120.
   Google Scholar
• Ang, T. T., M. Salem, and N. A. Prabaharan. 2022. Comprehensive study of renewable energy sources: Classifications, challenges and suggestions. Energy Strategy Rev 43:1000939. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2022.100939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arun, J., K. P. Gopinath, P. S. Sundarrajan, and P. S. Ajay. 2020. Hydrothermal liquefaction of scenedesmus obliquus using a novel catalyst derived from clam shells: Solid residue as a catalyst for hydrogen production. Bioresource Technology 310:123443. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. C., Q. Liu, and G. Norton. 2000. Catalytic effects observed during the co-gasification of coal and switch grass. Biomass- Bioenergy 18 (6):499–506. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00012-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, F. L., and A. Tanksale. 2014. Review of recent developments in Ni-based catalysts for biomass gasification. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 38:428–38. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochavi, A., T. Rapaport, T. Gendler, A. Karnieli, H. Eizenberg, S. Rachmilevitch, and J. E. Ephrath 2017. Recognition of Orobanche cumana below-ground parasitism through physiological and hyper spectral measurements in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Frontiers in Plant Science 8:909. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormos, C. C. 2023. Green hydrogen production from decarbonized biomass gasification: An integrated techno-economic and environmental analysis. Energy 270:126926. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.126926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daiva, G., and L. Zeng. 2023. Hydrogen production through two-stage sorption-enhanced biomass gasification: Process design and thermodynamic analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.216.
   Google Scholar
• Di Felice, L., C. Courson, P. U. Foscolo, and A. Kiennemann. 2011. Iron and nickel doped alkaline-earth catalysts for biomass gasification with simultaneous tar reformation and CO2 capture. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 36 (9):5296–310. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando, A. L. 2004. Miscanthus × giganteus: Contribution to a sustainable agriculture of a future/Present-oriented biomaterial. Materials Science Forum II:455–56. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.455-456.437.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, D. S., M. Kwapinska, A. Horvat, and J. J. Leahy. 2016. Cynara cardunculus L. gasification in a bubbling fluidized bed: The effect of magnesite and olivine on product gas, tar and gasification performance. Fuel 173:247–59. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.01.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhard, S. C., D. Wang, and M. A. Paisley. 1994. Catalytic conditioning of synthesis gas produced by biomass gasification. Biomass- Bioenergy 7:307–13. doi:10.1016/0961-9534(94)00073-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, Z., H. Jin, and L. Guo. 2014. Hydrogen production by catalytic gasification of coal in supercritical water with alkaline catalysts: Explore the way to complete gasification of coal. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39 (34):19583–92. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.09.119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinci, Y., A. Hepbasli, and I. Dincer. 2009. Biomass-based hydrogen production: A review and analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 (21):8799–817. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., H. Nam, S. H. Lee, and Y. K. Park. 2022. Recent progress in the catalytic thermochemical conversion process of biomass for biofuels. Journal of Chemical & Engineering 447:137501. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.137501.
   Google Scholar
• Nsanganwimana, F., K. S. A. Souki, C. Waterlot, F. Douay, A. Pelfrence, and B. Pourrut. 2021. Potentials of Miscanthus x giganteus for phytostabilization of trace element-contaminated soils: Ex situ experiment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 214:112125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, J. S., M. P. Duarte, and A. L. Fernando. 2001. Environmental aspects of miscanthus production. In Miscanthus: For energy and fibre, ed. M.B. Jones and M. Walsh, 172–178. London: Science Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy, P. 2014. Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: Influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield - a review. renewable energy 66:570–79. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires, J. R. A., and A. L. Fernando. 2019. Valorization of energy crops as a source for nanocellulose production—Current knowledge and future prospects. Industrial Crops & Products 140:111642. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samimi, F., T. Marzoughi, and M. R. Rahimpour. 2020. Energy and exergy analysis and optimization of biomass gasification process for hydrogen production (based on air, steam and air/steam gasifying agents). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45 (58):33185–97. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano, D., A. Horvat, C. Sobrino, and S. Sánchez-Delgado. 2019. Thermochemical conversion of C. cardunculus L. in nitrate molten salts. Applied Thermal Engineering 148:136–46. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.11.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, Y. Y., and M. T. Reaney. 2014. Flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) bioactive compounds and peptide nomenclature: A review. Trends Food SciTechnol 38 (1):5–20. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2014.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siyi, L., B. Xiao, and H. Maoyun. 2009. Hydrogen-rich gas from catalytic steam gasification of biomass in a fixed bed reactor: Influence of particle size on gasification performance. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34:1260–64. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.10.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, W., M. Zhao, Y. Xing, H. Ma, P. Liu, X. Li, H. Zhang, Y. Wu, and C. Xia. 2022. Supercritical water gasification of hyperaccumulators for hydrogen production and heavy metal immobilization with alkali metal catalysts. Environmental Research 214 (4):114093. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.114093.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valizadesh, S., and Y. K. Park. 2022. Valorization of biomass through gasification for green hydrogen generation: A comprehensive review. Bioresource Technology 365:128143. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., and Z. Shen. 2023. Process simulation and environmental impact assessment of different cases in hydrothermal catalytic bio-jet fuel production. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. doi:10.1007/s13399-023-04403-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, G., J. Huang, Z. Wan, H. Ling, and Q. Xu. 2022. Cow dung gasification process for hydrogen production using water Vapor as gasification agent. Processes 10 (7):1257. doi:10.3390/pr10071257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar