Investigations and development of novel fuel blends using biodiesel and butylated hydroxytoluene: optimization using D-optimal design and desirability

References

• Agrawal, T., R. Gautam, S. Agrawal, V. Singh, M. Kumar, and S. Kumar. 2020. Optimization of engine performance parameters and exhaust emissions in compression ignition engine fueled with biodiesel-alcohol blends using Taguchi method, multiple regression and artificial neural network. Sustainable Futures 2:100039. doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100039.
   Google Scholar
• Aktar, M. A., M. M. Alam, and A. Q. Al-Amin. 2021. Global economic crisis, energy use, CO2 emissions, and policy roadmap amid COVID-19. Sustainable Production and Consumption 26:770–81. doi:10.1016/J.SPC.2020.12.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, O. M., R. Mamat, N. R. Abdullah, and A. A. Abdullah. 2016. Analysis of blended fuel properties and engine performance with palm biodiesel–diesel blended fuel. Renewable Energy 86:59–67. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashok, B., K. Nanthagopal, A. K. Jeevanantham, P. Bhowmick, D. Malhotra, and P. Agarwal. 2017. An assessment of calophyllum inophyllum biodiesel fuelled diesel engine characteristics using novel antioxidant additives. Energy Conversion and Management 148:935–43. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.06.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakır, H., Ü. Ağbulut, A. E. Gürel, G. Yıldız, U. Güvenç, M. E. M. Soudagar, A. T. Hoang, B. Deepanraj, G. Saini, and A. Afzal. 2022. Forecasting of future greenhouse gas emission trajectory for India using energy and economic indexes with various metaheuristic algorithms. Journal of Cleaner Production 360:131946. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bora, B. J., and U. K. Saha. 2016. Experimental evaluation of a rice bran biodiesel – biogas run dual fuel diesel engine at varying compression ratios. Renewable Energy 87:782–90. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlucci, A. P., A. Ficarella, D. Laforgia, and L. Strafella. 2017. Improvement of dual-fuel biodiesel-producer gas engine performance acting on biodiesel injection parameters and strategy. Fuel 209:754–68. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, S., and V. V. Goud. 2021. RSM-optimised slow pyrolysis of rice husk for bio-oil production and its upgradation. Energy 225:120161. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Gendy, N. S., B. A. Ali, S. S. Abu Amr, H. A. Aziz, and A. S. Mohamed. 2016. Application of D-optimal design and RSM to optimize the transesterification of waste cooking oil using natural and chemical heterogeneous catalyst. Energy Sources, Part A Recovery, Utilization, & Environmental Effects 38 (13):1852–66. doi:10.1080/15567036.2014.967417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkelawy, M., H. Alm-Eldin Bastawissi, E. A. El Shenawy, M. Taha, H. Panchal, and K. K. Sadasivuni. 2021. Study of performance, combustion, and emissions parameters of DI-diesel engine fueled with algae biodiesel/diesel/n-pentane blends. Energy Conversion and Management: X 10:100058. doi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2020.100058.
   Google Scholar
• Elkelawy, M., E. A. El Shenawy, S. Almonem, A. Khalaf, M. H. Nasef, H. Panchal, H. A.-E. Bastawissi, K. K. Sadasivuni, A. K. Choudhary, D. Sharma, et al. 2021. Experimental study on combustion, performance, and emission behaviours of diesel/WCO biodiesel/cyclohexane blends in DI-CI engine. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 149:684–97. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2021.03.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparatos, A., S. Mudombi, B. S. Balde, G. P. von Maltitz, F. X. Johnson, C. Romeu-Dalmau, C. Jumbe, C. Ochieng, D. Luhanga, A. Nyambane, et al. 2022. Local food security impacts of biofuel crop production in southern Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 154:111875. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaur, A., G. Dwivedi, P. Baredar, and S. Jain. 2022. Influence of blending additives in biodiesel on physiochemical properties, engine performance, and emission characteristics. Fuel 321:124072. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giwa, S. O., K. A. Adegoke, R. T. Taziwa, and M. Sharifpur. 2023. A bibliometric analysis of studies on diesel engines fuelled with biodiesel and its blends: Trends, hotspots, and future research. Biofuels 1–15. doi:10.1080/17597269.2023.2210396.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., P. Patel, and P. Mondal. 2022. Biofuels production from pine needles via pyrolysis: Process parameters modeling and optimization through combined RSM and ANN based approach. Fuel 310:122230. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harington, J. 1965. The desirability function. Industrial Quality Control 21:494–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang, A. T., R. Sirohi, A. Pandey, S. Nižetić, S. S. Lam, W.-H. Chen, R. Luque, S. Thomas, M. Arıcı, and V. V. Pham. 2022. Biofuel production from microalgae: Challenges and chances. Phytochemistry Reviews 22 (4):1089–126. doi:10.1007/s11101-022-09819-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İ̇leri, E., and G. Koçar. 2014. Experimental investigation of the effect of antioxidant additives on NOx emissions of a diesel engine using biodiesel. Fuel 125:44–49. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyani, T., L. S. V. Prasad, and A. Kolakoti. 2023. Effect of triacetin as an oxygenated additive in algae biodiesel fuelled CI engine combustion, performance, and exhaust emission analysis. Fuel 338:127366. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimmaslak, H., B. Najafi, S. S. Band, S. Ardabili, F. Haghighat-Shoar, and A. Mosavi. 2021. Optimization of performance and emission of compression ignition engine fueled with propylene glycol and biodiesel–diesel blends using artificial intelligence method of ANN-GA-RSM. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 15 (1):413–25. doi:10.1080/19942060.2021.1880970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshtegar, B., C. Mert, and O. Kisi. 2018. Comparison of four heuristic regression techniques in solar radiation modeling: Kriging method vs RSM, MARS and M5 model tree. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81:330–41. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, S., and F. Mcclintock. 1953. Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments. Mechanical Engineering 75:3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Korczewski, Z. 2022. Energy and emission quality ranking of newly produced low-Sulphur marine fuels. Polish Maritime Research 29 (4):77–87. doi:10.2478/pomr-2022-0045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korczewski, Z. 2023. Health monitoring of a compression ignition engine fed with different low-sulphur marine fuels by endoscopic image processing and analysis. Polish Maritime Research 30 (2):85–94. doi:10.2478/pomr-2023-0024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulanthaivel, V., A. Jayaraman, T. Rajamanickam, and S. Selvam. 2021. Impact of diesel – algae biodiesel- anhydrous ethanol blends on the performance of CI engines. Journal of Cleaner Production 295:126422. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A. N., B. Ashok, K. Nanthagopal, H. C. Ong, M. J. Geca, J. Victor, R. Vignesh, A. K. Jeevanantham, C. Kannan, and P. S. Kishore. 2022. Experimental analysis of higher alcohol–based ternary biodiesel blends in CI engine parameters through multivariate and desirability approaches. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 12 (5):1525–40. doi:10.1007/s13399-020-01134-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, M., and M. Chen. 2022. Monitoring the performance of a Ship’s main engine based on big data technology. Polish Maritime Research 29 (3):128–40. doi:10.2478/pomr-2022-0033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londhe, H., G. Luo, S. Park, S. S. Kelley, and T. Fang. 2019. Testing of anisole and methyl acetate as additives to diesel and biodiesel fuels in a compression ignition engine. Fuel 246:79–92. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, M. 2017. Experimental design and response surface methodology in energy applications: A tutorial review. Energy Conversion and Management 151 (September):630–40. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.09.021.
   Google Scholar
• Marangon, B. B., I. B. Magalhães, A. S. A. P. Pereira, T. A. Silva, R. C. N. Gama, J. Ferreira, J. S. Castro, L. R. Assis, J. F. Lorentz, and M. L. Calijuri. 2023a. Emerging microalgae-based biofuels: Technology, life-cycle and scale-up. Chemosphere 326:138447. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangon, B. B., I. B. Magalhães, A. S. A. P. Pereira, T. A. Silva, R. C. N. Gama, J. Ferreira, J. S. Castro, L. R. Assis, J. F. Lorentz, and M. L. Calijuri. 2023b. Emerging microalgae-based biofuels: Technology, life-cycle and scale-up. Chemosphere 326:138447. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, H., and S. Capareda. 2015. Experimental investigation of torrefaction of two agricultural wastes of different composition using RSM (response surface methodology). Energy 91:507–16. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.08.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarpour, M., A. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, A. Asghari, A. Abbaszadeh-Mayvan, and A. Tatari. 2022. Optimization of biohydrogen production from microalgae by response surface methodology (RSM). Energy 253:124059. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.124059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V. G., S. Rajamohan, K. Rudzki, J. Kozak, P. Sharma, N. D. K. Pham, P. Q. P. Nguyen, and P. N. Xuan. 2023. Using artificial neural networks for predicting ship fuel consumption. Polish Maritime Research 30 (2):39–60. doi:10.2478/pomr-2023-0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V. N., K. Rudzki, M. Dzida, N. D. K. Pham, M. T. Pham, P. Q. P. Nguyen, and P. N. Xuan. 2023. Understanding fuel saving and clean fuel strategies towards green Maritime. Polish Maritime Research 30 (2):146–64. doi:10.2478/pomr-2023-0030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parida, M. K., H. Joardar, A. K. Rout, I. Routaray, and B. P. Mishra. 2019. Multiple response optimizations to improve performance and reduce emissions of argemone mexicana biodiesel-diesel blends in a VCR engine. Applied Thermal Engineering 148:1454–66. doi:10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2018.11.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qader, B. S., E. E. Supeni, M. K. A. Ariffin, and A. R. A. Talib. 2019. RSM approach for modeling and optimization of designing parameters for inclined fins of solar air heater. Renewable Energy 136:48–68. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, T., S. R. Winter, S. Rice, M. N. Milner, Z. Bledsaw, and E. C. Anania. 2017. Biofuel and commercial aviation: Will consumers pay more for it? International Journal of Sustainable Aviation 3 (3):217. doi:10.1504/IJSA.2017.086846.
   Google Scholar
• Rajamohan, S., A. Hari Gopal, K. R. Muralidharan, Z. Huang, B. Paramasivam, T. Ayyasamy, X. P. Nguyen, A. T. Le, and A. T. Hoang. 2022. Evaluation of oxidation stability and engine behaviors operated by Prosopis juliflora biodiesel/diesel fuel blends with presence of synthetic antioxidant. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 52:102086. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2022.102086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramalingam, K., S. Vellaiyan, E. P. Venkatesan, S. A. Khan, Z. Mahmoud, and C. A. Saleel. 2023. Challenges and opportunities of low viscous biofuel─A prospective review. ACS Omega 8 (19):16545–60. doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c00387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, A., Y. Liu, and F. Ma. 2022. Study of NOx emission for hydrogen enriched compressed natural along with exhaust gas recirculation in spark ignition engine by Zeldovich’ mechanism, support vector machine and regression correlation. Fuel 318:123577. doi:10.1016/J.FUEL.2022.123577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riayatsyah, T. M. I., R. Thaib, A. S. Silitonga, J. Milano, A. Shamsuddin, H. Sebayang, A. H. Rahmawaty, J. Sutrisno, and T. M. I. Mahlia. 2021. Biodiesel production from reutealis trisperma oil using conventional and ultrasonication through esterification and transesterification. Sustainability 13 (6):3350. doi:10.3390/su13063350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, M. M., W. Wang, and M. Alawi. 2014. Performance and emissions of a diesel engine fueled by biodiesel–diesel, biodiesel–diesel-additive and kerosene–biodiesel blends. Energy Conversion and Management 84:164–73. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzki, K., P. Gomulka, and A. T. Hoang. 2022. Optimization model to manage ship fuel consumption and navigation time. Polish Maritime Research 29 (3):141–53. doi:10.2478/pomr-2022-0034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sateesh, K. A., V. S. Yaliwal, M. E. M. Soudagar, N. R. Banapurmath, H. Fayaz, M. R. Safaei, A. Elfasakhany, and A. I. EL-Seesy. 2022. Utilization of biodiesel/Al2O3 nanoparticles for combustion behavior enhancement of a diesel engine operated on dual fuel mode. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 147 (10):5897–911. doi:10.1007/s10973-021-10928-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebayang, A. H., F. Ideris, A. S. Silitonga, A. H. Shamsuddin, M. F. M. A. Zamri, M. A. Pulungan, S. Siahaan, M. Alfansury, F. Kusumo, and J. Milano. 2023. Optimization of ultrasound-assisted oil extraction from Carica candamarcensis; a potential oleaginous tropical seed oil for biodiesel production. Renewable Energy 211:434–44. doi:10.1016/J.RENENE.2023.04.099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebayang, A. H., F. Kusumo, J. Milano, A. H. Shamsuddin, A. S. Silitonga, F. Ideris, J. Siswantoro, I. Veza, M. Mofijur, and S. Reen Chia. 2023. Optimization of biodiesel production from rice bran oil by ultrasound and infrared radiation using ANN-GWO. Fuel 346:128404. doi:10.1016/J.FUEL.2023.128404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebayang, A. H., J. Milano, A. H. Shamsuddin, M. Alfansuri, A. S. Silitonga, F. Kusumo, R. A. Prahmana, H. Fayaz, and M. F. M. A. Zamri. 2022. Modelling and prediction approach for engine performance and exhaust emission based on artificial intelligence of sterculia foetida biodiesel. Energy Reports 8:8333–45. doi:10.1016/J.EGYR.2022.06.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedghi, R., H. Shahbeik, H. Rastegari, S. Rafiee, W. Peng, A.-S. Nizami, V. K. Gupta, W.-H. Chen, S. S. Lam, J. Pan, et al. 2022. Turning biodiesel glycerol into oxygenated fuel additives and their effects on the behavior of internal combustion engines: A comprehensive systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 167:112805. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., D. Balasubramanian, C. Thanh Khai, I. Papla Venugopal, M. Alruqi, F. Josephin JS, A. Sonthalia, E. Geo Varuvel, E. Khalife, R. Ravikumar, et al. 2023. Enhancing the performance of renewable biogas powered engine employing oxyhydrogen: Optimization with desirability and D-optimal design. Fuel 341:127575. doi:10.1016/J.FUEL.2023.127575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silitonga, A. S., H. H. Masjuki, H. C. Ong, A. H. Sebayang, S. Dharma, F. Kusumo, J. Siswantoro, J. Milano, K. Daud, T. M. I. Mahlia, et al. 2018. Evaluation of the engine performance and exhaust emissions of biodiesel-bioethanol-diesel blends using kernel-based extreme learning machine. Energy 159:1075–87. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A., S. Sinha, A. K. Choudhary, D. Sharma, H. Panchal, and K. K. Sadasivuni. 2021. An experimental investigation of emission performance of heterogenous catalyst jatropha biodiesel using RSM. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 25:100876. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2021.100876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, F., G. Marques, E. Torres-Jiménez, B. Vieira, A. Lacerda, O. Armas, and F. Guerrero-Villar. 2019. A comparative study of performance and regulated emissions in a medium-duty diesel engine fueled with sugarcane diesel-farnesane and sugarcane biodiesel-LS9. Energy 176:392–409. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinidhi, C., A. Madhusudhan, S. V. Channapattana, S. V. Gawali, and K. Aithal. 2021. RSM based parameter optimization of CI engine fuelled with nickel oxide dosed Azadirachta indica methyl ester. Energy 234:121282. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramani, S., K. Natarajan, and G. Lakshmi Narayana Rao. 2021. Optimization of injection timing and anti-oxidants for multiple responses of CI engine fuelled with algae biodiesel blend. Fuel 287:119438. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan Hoang, A., and V. Viet Pham. 2021. 2-methylfuran (MF) as a potential biofuel: A thorough review on the production pathway from biomass, combustion progress, and application in engines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 148:111265. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzoh, C. F., A. Nnuekwe, O. Onukwuli, S. Ofochebe, and C. Ezekannagha. 2021. Optimal route for effective conversion of rubber seed oil to biodiesel with desired key fuel properties. Journal of Cleaner Production 280:124563. doi:10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.124563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venu, H., V. D. Raju, S. Lingesan, M. Elahi, and M. Soudagar. 2021. Influence of Al2O3nano additives in ternary fuel (diesel-biodiesel-ethanol) blends operated in a single cylinder diesel engine: Performance, combustion and emission characteristics. Energy 215:119091. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veza, I., A. D. Karaoglan, E. Ileri, S. A. Kaulani, N. Tamaldin, Z. A. Latiff, M. F. Muhamad Said, A. T. Hoang, K. V. Yatish, and M. Idris. 2022. Grasshopper optimization algorithm for diesel engine fuelled with ethanol-biodiesel-diesel blends. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 31:101817. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2022.101817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayakumar, C., M. Ramesh, A. Murugesan, N. Panneerselvam, D. Subramaniam, and M. Bharathiraja. 2016. Biodiesel from plant seed oils as an alternate fuel for compression ignition engines—a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23 (24):24711–30. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7754-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar