Assessment of skin and eye irritation of 14 products under the stepwise approach of the OECD

References

• European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods. Local toxicity: acute dermal and ocular effects. In: AP Worth, M Balls, eds. Alternative (non animal) methods for chemical testing: current status and future prospects. Altern Lab Anim 2002; 30(suppl. 1):35–47.
   Google Scholar
• M Robinson, R Osborne, and MA Perkins. Strategies for the assessment of acute skin irritation potential. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 1999; 42:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KR Wilhelmus. The Draize eye test. Surv Ophthalmol 2001; 45(6):493–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. OECD 404. Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion, Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. OECD 405. Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion; Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• JH Draize, G Woodard, HO Calvery. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1944; 82:377–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JH Fentem, and PA Botham. ECVAM's activities in validating alternative test for skin corrosion and irritation. Altern Lab Anim 2002; 30(suppl. 2):61–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RD Curren, and JW Harbell. Ocular safety: a silent (in vitro) success story. Altern Lab Anim 2002; 30(suppl. 2):69–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• F Moldenhauer. Using in vitro prediction models instead of the rabbit eye irritation test to classify and label new chemicals: a post hoc data analysis of the international EC/HO validation study. Altern Lab Anim 2003; 31(1):31–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Principles of Human Experimental TechniqueMethuen, London, 1959:238.
   Google Scholar
• RD Combes, I Guant, and M Balls. A scientific and animal welfare assessment of the OECD Health Effects Test Guidelines for the Safety Testing of Chemicals under the European Union REACH system. Altern Lab Anim 2004; 32(3):163–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Revised proposals for Updated Test Guidelines 404 and 405: Dermal and Eye Corrosion/Irritation Studies; ENV/JM/TG(2001)2; Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001:112.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. OECD 402. Acute Dermal Toxicity; Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1987.
   Google Scholar
• N Luepke. Hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential. Food Chem Toxicol 1985; 23:287–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency. Good Laboratory Practice Standards. Code of Federal Regulations 40, Chapter I, Part 160, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals; Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Harmonised Integrated Hazard Classification System for Human Health and Environmental Hazards of Chemical Substances and Mixtures. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, Number 33, ENV/JM/MONO(2001)6; Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001:247.
   Google Scholar
• Society of Toxicology. Dermal Toxicology Specialty Section. President's Message 2000; 1(1):11.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency. Azadirachtin: Tolerance Exemption. Rules and Regulations. Fed Regist 1993; 58(30).
   Google Scholar
• Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS). EPA Microbial Pesticide Test Guidelines, OPPTS 883-3000; Background—Mammalian toxicity/pathogenicity/infectivity; Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• www.sciencelab.com/xMSDS-Capsaicin_Natural-9923296 (accessed June 2007).
   Google Scholar
• www.gowanintl.com/(S(1ptadhvtz2ssxc55xl4txg45))/Reference/Document˜rid˜79˜AZADirect.PDF.aspx (accessed May 2007).
   Google Scholar
• www.cdms.net/LDat/mp6HN000.pdf (accessed May 2007).
   Google Scholar
• AP Worth, and MTD Cronin. Prediction models for eye irritation potential based on end-points of the HET-CAM and neutral red assays. In Vitro Mol Toxicol 2001; 14:143–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• H Spielmann, S Kalweit, M Liebsch, F Moldenhauer, T Wirnserberger, HG Holzhutter, B Schneider, S Glaser, I Gerner, W Pape, R Kreiling, K Krauser, HG Miltenburger, W Steiling, NP Luepke, N Muller, H Kreuzer, P Murmann, J Spengler, E Bertram-Neis, B Siegmund, and FJ Wiebel. Results of a validation study in Germany on two in vitro alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test, HET-CAM test and the 3T3 NRU cytotoxicity test. Altern Lab Anim 1996; 24(5):741–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DJ Knight, and D Breheny. Alternatives to animals testing in the safety evaluation of products. Altern Lab Anim 2002; 30(1):7–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J Cejkova, Z Lojda, B Brunova, J Vacik, and J Michalek. Disturbances in the rabbit cornea after short-term and long-term wear of hydrogel contact lenses: usefulness of histochemical methods. Histochemistry 1988; 89:91–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JL Ubels, RM Prius, JT Sybesma, and PL Casterton. Corneal opacity, hydration and endothelial morphology in the cornea opacity and permeability assay using reduced treatment times. Toxicol In Vitro 2000; 14:379–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• http://cryptome.org/stoa-atpc.htm (accessed May 2007).
   Google Scholar
• FE Freeberg, GA Nixon, PJ Reer, JE Weaver, RD Bruce, JF Griffith, and LWI Sanders. Human and rabbit eye responses to chemical insult. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1986; 7:626–634.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GP Daston, FE Freeberg. Ocular irritation testing. In: DW Hobson, ed. Dermal and Ocular Toxicology: Fundamentals and Methods; Ann Arbor, MI: CRC Press. 1991:509–540.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. OECD 420. Acute Oral Toxicity—Fixed Dose Method; Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001.
   Google Scholar