Preschool Policymaking by Stealth: Application of an Alternative Framework for the Policy Process

References

• Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2013). The 2013 kids count data book. Retrieved from http://datacenter.kidscount.org/publications/databook/2013
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, W. S., Carolan, M. E., Squires, J. H., Brown, K. C., & Horowitz, M. (2015). The state of preschool 2014: State preschool yearbook. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, C. M. (2013). The curious case of Oklahoma: An historical analysis of the passage of universal pre-kindergarten legislation in Oklahoma ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Texas, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Bushouse, B. K. (2009). Universal preschool: Policy change, stability, and the Pew Charitable Trusts. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catholic Campaign for Human Development. (2011). The state of poverty: Poverty map. Retrieved from http://www.povertyusa.org/the-state-of-poverty/poverty-map-state/
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. S. (2001). Championing child care. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Safety Net. (2013). Welfare opinion: Public opinion polls on welfare and poverty. Retrieved from http://federalsafetynet.com/welfare-opinion.html
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, B. (2007). Standardized childhood: The political and cultural struggle over early education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, I. (Producer). (2012). Getting away with it. [Radio broadcast]. Chicago, IL: Public Radio International.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, G. (1990). Social policy by stealth. Policy Options, 11(March), 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsson, K. & Fossum, B. (2009). An exploration of the theoretical concepts of policy windows and policy entrepreneurship at the Swedish public health arena. Health Promotion International, 24(4), 434–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2014). The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In P. A. Sabatier, & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 183–224). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser Family Foundation. (2013). Distribution of state general fund expenditures. Retrieved from http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/distribution-of-general-fund-spending/
   Google Scholar
• Karch, A. (2010). Policy feedback and preschool funding in the American states. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 217–234. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1541-0072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karch, A. (2013). Early start: Preschool politics in the United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karch, A. (2015). The shifting politics of early childhood education. Human Capital Research Collaborative’s Brown Bag Faculty Research Seminar. Personal collection of A. Karch, Univesrity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Kirp, D. L. (2009). The sandbox investment: The preschool movement and kids-first politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, S. (2012). Pre-k on the range. American Prospect, 23(November/December), 60–67.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 738–770. doi:10.2307/2111674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. The Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667. doi:10.1111/psj.2009.37.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A. L. (2003). When opportunity knocks: Economic liberalism and stealth welfare in the United States. Journal of Social Policy, 32(2), 179–197. doi:10.1017/S0047279402006955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palley, E. (2012). Expected struggles: U.S. child care policy. Children & Youth Services Review, 34(4), 628–638. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phi Delta Kappa International. (2014). The PDK/Gallup poll of the public’s attitudes toward public schools. Retrieved from http://pdkintl.org/programs-resources/poll/
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P.A. & Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, P. (2014). Red State, Blue State: Polarization and the American Situation. The American Prospect. Retrieved November 3, from http://prospect.org/article/red-state-blue-state-polarization-and-american-situation
   Google Scholar
• Swift, A. (2014). Wyoming residents most conservative, D.C. most liberal. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/167144/wyoming-residents-conservative-liberal.aspx
   Google Scholar
• West Virginia Board of Education. (2014). West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2525 – West Virginia’s universal access to a quality early education system. Retrieved from http://static.k12.wv.us/oel/docs/WV-PreK-Overview-2013-14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wrobel, S. (2012). From threat to opportunity: A Head Start program’s response to state funded pre-k. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 35(Summer), 74–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zahariadis, N. (2014). Ambiguity and multiple streams. In P. Sabatier, & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process. (3rd ed., pp. 25–58). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar