Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice Volume 12, 2018 - Issue 3
Journal homepage
76
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Reducing sample size needed for accelerated failure time model using more efficient sampling methods

Hani M. SamawiDepartment of Biostatistics, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USACorrespondence[email protected]
,
Amal HeluDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
,
Haresh RochaniDepartment of Biostatistics, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USA
,
JingJing YinDepartment of Biostatistics, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USAORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-4843-613X
ORCID Icon,
Lili YuDepartment of Biostatistics, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USA
&
Robert VogelDepartment of Biostatistics, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USA
Pages 530-541 | Received 28 Nov 2016, Accepted 19 Jan 2018, Published online: 08 Feb 2018

References

  • Al-Saleh, M. F., and H. Samawi. 2010. On estimating the odds using moving extreme ranked set sampling. Statistical Methodology 7 (2):133–40.
  • Chapman, J. W., M. E. Trudeau, K. I. Pritchard, C. A. Sawka, B. G. Mobbs, W. M. Hanna, H. Kahn, D. R. McCready, and L. A. Lickley. 1992. A comparison of all-subset Cox and accelerated failure time models with Cox step-wise regression for node-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 22 (3):263–72.
  • Cox, D. R. 1972. Regression models and life-table. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 34 (2):187–220.
  • Liu, X. 2012. Survival analysis, models and applications. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • McIntyre, G. A. 1952. A method for unbiased selective sampling, using ranked sets. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research 3:385–90.
  • Mode, N. A., L. L. Conquest, and D. A. Maeker. 1999. Ranked set sampling for ecological research: Accounting for the total costs of sampling. Environmetrics 10:179–94.
  • Patil, G., A. Sinha, and C. Taillie. 1999. Ranked set sampling: A bibliography. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 6 (1):91–98.
  • Rubenstein, L. M., and J. H. Lemke. 1993. The construction of self-reported medical condition histories: The Iowa 65+ Rural Health Study. Technical report no. 93-2. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health.
  • Samawi, H., and F. Ababneh. 2001. On regression analysis using ranked set sample. Journal of Statistical Research (JSR) 35 (2):93–105.
  • Samawi, H. M., and W. Abu-Dayyeh. 2002. On regression analysis with random regressors using ranked samples. International Journal of Information and Management Sciences 13 (3):19–36.
  • Samawi, H. M., M. S. Ahmed, and W. Abu‐Dayyeh. 1996. Estimating the population mean using extreme ranked set sampling. Biometrical Journal 38 (5):577–86.
  • Samawi, H. M., and M. F. Al-Saleh. 2002. On regression analysis using bivariate ranked set samples. Metron 60 (3):29–48.
  • Samawi, H. M., and M. F. Al-Saleh. 2004. On bivariate ranked set sampling for distribution and quantile estimation and quantile interval estimation using ratio estimator. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 33 (8):1801–19.
  • Samawi, H. M., M. F. Al-Saleh, and O. Al-Saidy. 2009. The matched pair sign test using bivariate ranked set sampling for different ranking based schemes. Statistical Methodology 6 (4):397–407.
  • Samawi, H. M., and M. F. andAl-Saleh. 2013. Valid estimation of odds ratio using two types of moving extreme ranked set sampling. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society 42 (1):17–24.
  • See, C., and J. Chen. 2008. Inequalities on the variance of convex functions of random variables. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 9 (3):1–5.
  • Swindell, W. R. 2009. Accelerated failure time models provide a useful statsitical framework for aging research. Experimental Gerontology 44 (3):190–200. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2008.10.005.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.