Brain functional connectivity of hypnosis without target suggestion. An intrinsic hypnosis rs-fMRI study

References

• Acunzo DJ, Terhune DB, Sharma A, Hickey CM. 2022. Absorption and dissociation mediate the relationship between direct verbal suggestibility and impulsivity/compulsivity. Acta Psychol. 231(October):103793. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103793.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer CCC, Díaz J-L, Concha L, Barrios FA. 2014. Sustained attention to spontaneous thumb sensations activates brain somatosensory and other proprioceptive areas. Brain Cogn. 87:86–96. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell V, Oakley D. a, Halligan PW, Deeley Q. 2011. Dissociation in hysteria and hypnosis: evidence from cognitive neuroscience. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 82(3):332–339. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2009.199158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benham G, Smith N, Nash M. 2002. Hypnotic susceptibility scales: are the mean scores increasing? Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 50(1):5–16. doi:10.1080/00207140208410087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantagallo A, Maini M, Rumiati RI. 2012. The cognitive rehabilitation of limb apraxia in patients with stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 22(3):473–488. doi:10.1080/09602011.2012.658317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardeña E, Jönsson P, Terhune DB, Marcusson-Clavertz D. 2013. The neurophenomenology of neutral hypnosis. Cortex. 49(2):375–385. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.04.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardeña E, Spiegel D. 1991. Suggestibility, absorption, and dissociation: an integrative model of hypnosis. In: J. F. Schumaker, editor, Human suggestibility: advances in theory, research, and application. New York: Taylor & Frances/Routledge; p. 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Cauda F, D’Agata F, Sacco K, Duca S, Geminiani G, Vercelli A. 2011. Functional connectivity of the insula in the resting brain. Neuroimage. 55(1):8–23. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts S, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Stam CJ, Smith SM, Beckmann CF. 2006. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103(37):13848–13853. doi:10.1073/pnas.0601417103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeley Q, Oakley DA, Toone B, Giampietro V, Brammer MJ, Steven C, Williams CR, Halligan PW. 2012. Modulating the default mode network using hypnosis. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 60(2):206–228. doi:10.1080/00207144.2012.648070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demertzi A, Soddu A, Faymonville M-E, Bahri MA, Gosseries O, Vanhaudenhuyse A, … Laureys S. 2011. Hypnotic modulation of resting state fMRI default mode and extrinsic network connectivity. Prog Brain Res.193:309–22. Elsevier B.V. Amsterdam. The Netherlands. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53839-0.00020-X.
   Google Scholar
• Demertzi A, Soddu A, Faymonville M-E, Bahri MA, Gosseries O, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Phillips C, Maquet P, Noirhomme Q, Luxen A, Laureys S. 2011. Hypnotic modulation of resting state fMRI default mode and extrinsic network connectivity. Prog Brain Res. 193:309–322. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53839-0.00020-X.
   Google Scholar
• Ellason JW, Ross CA. 2004. SCL-90-R norms for dissociative identity disorder. J Trauma Dissoc. 5(3):85–91. doi:10.1300/J229v05n03_06.
   Google Scholar
• Ellenberger HF. 1970. The discovery of the unconscious: The history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry. New York: Basic Books; pp. 209–210.
   Google Scholar
• Facco E, Mendozzi L, Bona A, Motta A, Garegnani M, Costantini I, Dipasquale O, Cecconi P, Menotti R, Coscioli E, et al. 2019. Dissociative identity as a continuum from healthy mind to psychiatric disorders: epistemological and neurophenomenological implications approached through hypnosis. Med Hypotheses. 130:109274. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi B, Oakley DA. 2005. Does “hypnosis” by any other name smell as sweet? The efficacy of “hypnotic” inductions depends on the label “hypnosis”. Conscious Cogn. 14(2):304–315. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldenmund P, Demertzi A, Boveroux P, Boly M, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Bruno MA, Gosseries O, Noirhomme Q, Brichant JF, Bonhomme V, Laureys S, Soddu A. 2013. Thalamus, brainstem and salience network connectivity changes during propofol-induced sedation and unconsciousness. Brain Connect. 3(3):273–285. doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halligan PW, Oakley DA. 2013. Hypnosis and cognitive neuroscience: bridging the gap. Cortex. 49(2):359–364. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine L, Soddu A, Gómez F, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Tshibanda L, Thonnard M, Charland-Verville V, Kirsch M, Laureys S, Demertzi A. 2012. Resting state networks and consciousness: alterations of multiple resting state network connectivity in physiological, pharmacological, and pathological consciousness states. Front Psychol. 3(August):295. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoeft F, Gabrieli JDE, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Haas BW, Bammer R, Menon V, Spiegel D. 2012. Functional brain basis of hypnotizability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 69(10):1064–1072. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom J. 2004. Hypnosis. Encyclopedia of applied psychology. Florida: Elsevier; p. 243–248. doi:10.1016/B0-12-657410-3/00141-0.
   Google Scholar
• Knauff M, Mulack T, Kassubek J, Salih HR, Greenlee MW. 2002. Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: a functional MRI study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 13(2):203–212. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00116-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemercier CE, Terhune DB. 2018. Psychedelics and hypnosis: commonalities and therapeutic implications. J Psychopharmacol. 32(7):732–740. doi:10.1177/0269881118780714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynall M-E, Bassett DS, Kerwin R, McKenna PJ, Kitzbichler M, Muller U, Bullmore E. 2010. Functional connectivity and brain networks in schizophrenia. J Neurosci. 30(28):9477–9487. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0333-10.2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn SJ, Green JP. 2011. The sociocognitive and dissociation theories of hypnosis: toward a rapprochement. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 59(3):277–293. doi:10.1080/00207144.2011.570652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni G, Venneri A, McGeown WJ, Kirsch I. 2013. Neuroimaging resolution of the altered state hypothesis. Cortex. 49(2):400–410. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeown WJ, Mazzoni G, Venneri A, Kirsch I. 2009. Hypnotic induction decreases anterior default mode activity. Conscious Cogn. 18(4):848–855. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon V, Uddin LQ. 2010. Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Struct Funct. 214(5–6):655–667. doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millière R, Carhart-Harris RL, Roseman L, Trautwein FM, Berkovich-Ohana A. 2018. Psychedelics, meditation, and self-consciousness. Front Psychol. 9(SEP):1475. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01475.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson KM. 1990. The effect of subject expectations of “hypnosis” upon vividness of visual imagery. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 38(1):17–24. doi:10.1080/00207149008414495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley DA, Halligan PW. 2009. Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci. 13(6):264–270. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield RC. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 9(1):97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinho AL, Ullén F, Castelo-Branco M, Fransson P, de Manzano Ö. 2015. Addressing a paradox: dual strategies for creative performance in introspective and extrospective networks. Cerebral Cortex. 26(7):3052–3063. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pessoa L. 2009. How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends Cogn Sci. 13:160–166. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner MI, Rothbart MK. 2009. Toward a physical basis of attention and self regulation. Phys Life Rev. 6: 103–120. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2009.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raichle ME. 2011. The restless brain. Brain Connect. 1(1):3–12. doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raz A. 2011. Hypnosis: a twilight zone of the top-down variety. Few have never heard of hypnosis but most know little about the potential of this mind-body regulation technique for advancing science. Trends Cogn Sci. 15(12):555–557. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothbart MK, Rueda MR. 2005. The development of effortful control. In: Mayr U, Awh E, Keele S, editors. Developing individuality in the human brain: A tribute to Michael I. Posner. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; pp. 167–188.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda MR, Posner MI, Rothbart MK. 2004. Attentional control and self-regulation. In: Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, editors. Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York: The Guilford Press; pp. 283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Rumiati RI. 2014. One or two things I know about apraxia. Cortex. 57:279–280. discussion 306–8. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Armáss O, Barabasz AF. 2005. Mexican norms for the Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale, form C. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 53(3):321–331. doi:10.1080/00207140590961448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SM, Fox PT, Miller KL, Glahn DC, Fox PM, Mackay CE, Filippini N, Watkins KE, Toro R, Laird AR, Beckmann CF. 2009. Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106(31):13040–13045. doi:10.1073/pnas.0905267106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surman O, Baer L. 2008. Measurement of hypnotic susceptibility in chapter 15 -Hypnosis. In Massachusetts general hospital, comprehensive clinical psychiatry. Philadelphia (PA): Mosby; pp. 183–188. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-04743-2.50017-2.
   Google Scholar
• Tart CT. 1970. Self-report scales of hypnotic depth. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 18(2):105–125. doi:10.1080/00207147008415909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhune DB, Cardeña E, Lindgren M. 2011. Differential frontal-parietal phase synchrony during hypnosis as a function of hypnotic suggestibility. Psychophysiology. 48(10):1444–1447. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01211.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dromme ICL, Vanduffel W, Janssen P. 2015. The relation between functional magnetic resonance imaging activations and single-cell selectivity in the macaque intraparietal sulcus. Neuroimage. 113:86–100. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhaudenhuyse A, Laureys S, Faymonville M-E. 2014. Neurophysiology of hypnosis. Neurophysiol Clin. 44(4):343–353. doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2013.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuilleumier P. 2014. Brain circuits implicated in psychogenic paralysis in conversion disorders and hypnosis. Neurophysiol Clinique Clin Neurophysiol. 44(4):323–337. doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2014.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff GF, Cole JC, Brunas-Wagstaff J. 2007. Effects of hypnotic induction and hypnotic depth on phonemic fluency: a test of the frontal inhibition account of hypnosis, 7, 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer AM, Hilgard ER. 1962. Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale. Form C: to be used in conjunction with Forms A and B in research investigations in the field of hypnotic phenomena. Stanford University. Consulting Psychologists Press. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/4729570
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Nieto-Castanon A. 2012. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect. 2(3):125–141. doi:10.1089/brain.2012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar