References
- British Society of Criminology. (1999). Code of ethics. BSC.
- Church, A. H. (1993). Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates – a meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(1), 62–79.
- Coomber, R. (2002). Signing your life away?: Why Research Ethics Committees (REC) shouldn’t always require written confirmation that participants in research have been informed of the aims of a study and their rights - the case of criminal populations. (Commentary). Sociological Research Online, 7 (1), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/1/coomber.html
- Dickert, N., & Grady, C. (1999). What’s the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. New England Journal of Medicine, 341(3), 198–203.
- Dorn, N. (1994). Three faces of police referral: Welfare, justice and business perspectives on multi-agency work with drug arrestees. Policing and Society, 4, 13–34.
- Dorn, N., & Seddon, T. (1996). Welfare, partnership and crime reduction: Aspects of court referral schemes for drug users. Drugs: education, prevention and policy, 3(1), 57–70.
- Esping-Anderson, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Feldman, D. (2002). Civil liberties and human rights in England and Wales. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Fry, C., & Dwyer, R. (2001). For love or money? An exploratory study of why injecting drug users partici- pate in research. Addiction, 96, 1319–1325.
- Goetz, E. G., Tyler, T. R., & Cook, F. L. (1984). Promised incentives in media research: A look at data quality, sample representativeness, and response rates. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 148–154.
- Grady, C. (2001). Money for research participation: Does it jeopardize informed consent?. The American Journal of Bioethics, 1, 41–44.
- James, J. M., & Bolstein, R. (1990). The effect of monetary incentives and follow-up mailings on the response rate and response quality in mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 346–361.
- Macklin, R. (1981). ‘Due’ and ‘undue’ inducements: On paying money to research subjects. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 3, 1–6.
- Nicolaas, G. (2004). The use of incentives to motivate ‘hard to get’ households on the National Travel Survey. Survey Methods Newsletter, 22, 19–27. London: NatCen.
- Nicolaas, G., & Lynn, P. (1998). The use of respondent incentives in surveys. Survey Methods Centre Newsletter, London: NatCen. 18(2), 3–8.
- Packer, H. (1968). The limits of the criminal sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Ritter, A., Fry, C., & Swan, A. (2003). The ethics of reimbursing injecting drug users for public health research interviews: what price are we prepared to pay? International Journal of Drug Policy, 14, 1–3.
- Singer, E. N., Van Hoewyk, J., Gebler, T., Raghunathan, T., & McGonagle, K. (1999). The effect of incentives on response rates in interviewer-mediated surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 15(2), 217–230.
- Social Research Association. (2002). Ethical guidelines. London: Social Research Association.
- Tzamourani, P., & Lynn, P. (1999). The effect of monetary incentives on data quality – Results from the British Social Attitudes Survey 1998 experiment. CREST Working Paper No 73. Oxford: Centre for Research into Elections and Social Trends.
- von Hirsch, A. (1976). Doing justice. New York: Hill and Wang.
- Willimack, D. K., Schuman, H., Pennell, B. E., & Lepkowski, J. M. (1995). Effects of a prepaid nonmonetary incentive on response rates and response quality in a face-to-face survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(1), 78–92.