The gut–brain axis: historical reflections

References

• Knight R, Buhler B. Follow your gut: the enormous impact of tiny microbes. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Perlmutter D. Brain maker: the power of gut microbes to heal and protect your brain - for life. London: Hachette; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer E. The mind-gut connection: how the hidden conversation within our bodies impact our mood, our choices and our overall health. New York: Harper Wave; 2018 [2016].
   Google Scholar
• Dietert R. The human superorganism: how the microbiome is revolutionizing the pursuit of a healthy life. London: Penguin; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland N, Stanton C, eds. The gut-brain axis: dietary, probiotic and prebiotic interventions on the microbiota. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson SC, Cryan JF, Dinan T. The psychobiotic revolution. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan F, Fitzgerald G. Translating microbiome science to society: what’s next? In: Hyland N, Stanton C, editors. The gut-brain axis: dietary, probiotic and prebiotic interventions on the microbiota. chapter 22. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2016. pp. 465–470.
   Google Scholar
• Gershon M. The second brain: the scientific basis of gut instinct and a ground-breaking new understanding of nervous disorders of the stomach and intestine. New York: HarperCollins; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Perlmutter D, Loberg K. Brain maker: the power of gut microbes to heal and protect your brain – for life. New York: Little, Brown and Co.; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Miller I. A modern history of the stomach: gastric illness, medicine and British society, 1800–1950. London: Pickering and Chatto; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Forth CE, Carden-Coyne A, eds. Cultures of the abdomen: diet, digestion and fat in the modern world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward R. Busman’s stomach and the embodiment of modernity. Cont Brit Hist. 2017;31(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr RA, Kleiman-Lafon S, eds. Bellies, bowels and entrails in the eighteenth century. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Baron JH. The stomach, a biography: four thousand years of stomach pains, literature, symptoms and epidemiology. Charleston: Createspace; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Whytt R. Observations on the nature, causes and cure of those disorders which have been commonly called nervous, hypochondriac or hysteric. Edinburgh: T. Becket; 1765.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw W. The Anatomy of Dyspepsia. London: G. Philip; 1864.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw W. Brain and Stomach or Mind and Matter. London: W. Philip; 1867.
   Google Scholar
• Abernethy J. Surgical observations on the constitutional origin and treatment of local diseases. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green and Longman; 1811.
   Google Scholar
• Abernethy J. The Abernethian Code of Health and Longevity. London: J. Williams; 1829.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson J. An essay on morbid sensibility of the stomach and bowels. London: Thomas and George Underwood; 1827.
   Google Scholar
• Alberti FB. Matters of the heart: history, medicine and emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Murray W. A treatise on emotional disorders of the sympathetic system of nerves. London: Churchill; 1866.
   Google Scholar
• Anon Dr. Baillie’s post-humous writings. Med Chir Rev 1826;4(8):364–379.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Parker on the stomach in its morbid states. Dublin J Med Sci 1838;13(12):334–349.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons B. An essay on the crimes, diseases and other evils connected with the use of intoxicating diseases. London: John Snow; 1840.
   Google Scholar
• North Wales chronicle. 15 Mar 1851.
   Google Scholar
• Biliousness PR, In Bynum WF, ed. Gastroenterology in Britain: historical essays. London: Wellcome Institute; 1997. p. 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Editorial. Freeman’s Journal. 26 Oct 1847.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Meditations on dyspepsia. Blackwood’s Edinburgh Review. 1861;90(52):302.
   Google Scholar
• Whyting S. Memoirs of a stomach: written by himself, with notes by a minister of the interior. London: Chapman and Hall; 1853.
   Google Scholar
• Miller I. ‘A dangerous revolutionary force amongst us’: conceptualising working-class tea drinking in the British isles, c.1860–1900. Cult Soc Hist. 2013;10(3):419–438.
   Google Scholar
• Editorial. North Wales Chronicle. 13 Oct 1883.
   Google Scholar
• Editorial. Freeman’s Journal. 14 Sept 1872.
   Google Scholar
• Miller I. Reforming food in post-famine Ireland: medicine, science and improvement, 1845–1922. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Leared A. The causes and treatment of imperfect digestion. London: John Churchill; 1860.
   Google Scholar
• Alleged Increasing Prevalence of Insanity in Ireland: Special Report from the Inspectors of Lunatics to the Chief Secretary, H.C. 1894 [C.7331], xliii.647.
   Google Scholar
• Jewson N. The disappearance of the sick-man from medical cosmology, 1770–1870. Sociol. 1976;10(2):225–244.
   Google Scholar
• Abercrombie J. Pathological and practical researches on diseases of the stomach. Edinburgh: Waugh and Innes; 1830.
   Google Scholar
• Brinton W. On the pathology, symptoms and treatment of ulcer of the stomach. London: John Churchill; 1857.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts W. Lectures on dietetics and dyspepsia. London: Smith, Elder; 1885.
   Google Scholar
• Drewry GO. Common-sense management of the stomach. London: Henry S. King; 1875.
   Google Scholar
• Einhorn M. Diseases of the Stomach. London: Ballière & Co.; 1897.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie AL. A manual of modern gastric methods: chemical, physical and therapeutical. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; 1899.
   Google Scholar
• Niles GM. The diagnosis and treatment of digestive disorders. London: Henry Kimpton; 1914.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo-Robson AW, Moynihan B. Diseases of the stomach and their surgical treatment. 2nd ed. London: Ballière, Tindall and Cox; 1904. p. 123–128.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan B. The pathology of the living and other essays. Philadelphia and London: W.B. Saunders & Co.; 1910.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick WS. Dyspepsia: its varieties and treatment. Philadelphia and London: W.B. Saunders; 1910.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon WB. The influence of emotional states on the functions of the alimentary canal. Am J Med Sci. 1909;137(4):480–486.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez WC. Nervous indigestion. London: William Heinemann; 1930.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander F. The influence of psychologic factors upon gastrointestinal disturbances’. Psychoanalytic Q. 1934;3(4):501–539.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence C, Weisz G, eds. Greater than the parts: holism in biomedicine, 1920–1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander F. Psychosomatic Medicine. New York and London: Norton; 1950.
   Google Scholar
• See Jackson M. The age of stress: science and the search for stability. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Miller I. The mind and stomach at war: stress and abdominal illness in Britain, c.1939–45. Med Hist. 2010;54(1):95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp R. How to live with your duodenal ulcer. London: British Medical Association; 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Parr J. How I cured my duodenal ulcer. London: Michael Joseph; 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Black J. Reflections on the analytical pharmacology of histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Gastrol. 1993;105(4):963–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall BJ, Warren RM. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet. 1984;16(8390):1311–1315.
   Google Scholar
• Bardhan KD. Perspectives in duodenal ulcer. 2nd ed. Welwyn Garden City: Smith, Kline and French; 1981 [1977].
   Google Scholar
• Levenstein S. ‘The very model of a modern etiology’: a biopsychosocial view of peptic ulcer. Psychosom Med. 2000;62(2):176–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiro H. Peptic ulcer is not a disease, only a sign! Stress is a factor in more than a few dyspeptics. Psychosom Med. 2000;62(2):186–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar