142
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Speech perception with hearing aids: Effects of noise reduction and directional microphone systems on amplified signals

, , &
Pages 106-111 | Published online: 13 Aug 2009

References

  • Moore BCJ. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implication for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear. 1996; 17: 133–60
  • Plomp R. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978; 63: 533–49
  • Killion MC. SNR loss: I can hear what people say, but I can't understand them. Hear Rev. 1997; 4: 8–14
  • Chung K. Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms. Trends Ampl. 2004; 8: 125–64
  • Bentler R. Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005; 16: 473–84
  • Ricketts TA, Hornsby BWY. Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing ‘digital noise reduction’. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005; 16: 270–7
  • Palmer CV, Bentler R, Mueller HG. Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds. Trends Amplif. 2006; 10: 95–104
  • Kuk FK, Kollofski C, Brown S, Melum A, Rosenthal A. Use of a digital hearing aid with directional microphones in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol. 1999; 10: 535–48
  • Ricketts TA. Impact of noise source configuration on directional hearing aid benefit and performance. Ear Hear. 2000; 21: 194–205
  • Wouters J, van den Bergh J, May JB. Adaptive noise suppression for a dual-microphone hearing aid. Int J Audiol. 2002; 41: 401–7
  • Walden BE, Surr RK, Cord MT, Edwards B, Olson L. Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000; 11: 540–60
  • Cord MT, Surr RK, Walden BE, Olson L. Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002; 13: 295–307
  • Walden BE, Surr RK, Cord MT, Dyrlund O. Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in every day listening. J Am Acad Audiol. 2004; 15: 342–52
  • Ricketts TA, Henry P, Gnewikow D. Full-time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids. Ear Hear. 2003; 24: 424–39
  • Kuk F, Keenan D, Lau C, Ludvigsen C. Performance of a fully adaptive directional microphone to signals presented from various azimuths. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005; 16: 333–47
  • Pumford JM, Seewald RC, Scollie SD, Jenstad LM. Speech recognition with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear dual microphone instruments J Am Acad Audiol. 2000; 11: 23–35
  • Ricketts TA. Directivity quantification in hearing aids: fitting and measurement effects. Ear Hear. 2000; 21: 45–58
  • Ricketts TA. Directional hearing aids. Trends Amplif. 2001; 5: 139–76
  • Valente M, Fabry DA, Potts LG. Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. J Am Acad Audiol. 1995; 6: 440–9
  • Cord MT, Surr RK, Walden BE, Dyrlund O. Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 2004; 15: 353–64

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.