NURBS-based and parametric-based shape optimization with differentiated CAD kernel

References

• Auriemma, S.; Banovic, M.; Mykhaskiv, O.; Legrand, H.; Müller, J.D.; Walther, A.: Optimization of a U-bend using CAD-based adjoint method with differentiated CAD kernel, ECCOMAS Congress, 2016. https://doi.org/10.7712/100016.2089.10065
   Google Scholar
• Banovic, M.; Mykhaskiv, O.; Auriemma, S.; Walther, A.; Legrand, H.; Müller, J. F.: Automatic Differentiation of the Open CASCADE Technology CAD System and its coupling with an Adjoint CFD Solver, http://www.optimization-online.org/DB\_HTML/2017/03/5931.html
   Google Scholar
• De Boer, A.; Van der Schoot, M. S.; Bijl, H.: New method for mesh moving based on radial basis function interpolation, In ECCOMAS CFD 2006: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dannenhoffer, J.; Haimes, R.: Design sensitivity calculations directly on CAD-based geometry. In 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-1370
   Google Scholar
• Economon, T. D.; Palacios, F.; Copeland, S. R.; Lukaczyk, T. W.; Alonso, J. J.: SU2: An Open-Source Suite for Multiphysics Simulation and Design, AIAA Journal, 2015, 54(3), 828–846. doi: 10.2514/1.J053813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gräsel, J.; Keskin, A.; Swoboda, M.; Przewozny, H.; Saxer, A.: A full parametric model for turbomachinery blade design and optimization, In ASME 2004 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2004,907–914.
   Google Scholar
• Griewank, A.; Walther, A.: Evaluating Derivatives: Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation, 2nd ed., Society for Industrial Mathematics, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898717761
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, A.: Aerodynamic Design via Control Theory, Journal of Scientific Computing, 3, 1988, 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061285
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, A.; Vassberg, J. C.: Studies of alternative numerical optimization methods applied to the brachistochrone problem, Computational Fluid Dynamics Journal, 9(3), 2000, 281–296.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D.; Müller, J. D.; Christakopoulos, F.: Preparation and assembly of discrete adjoint CFD codes, Computers & Fluids, 46(1), 2011, 282–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.01.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piegl, L.; Tiller, W.: The NURBS book, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Pironneau, O.: On optimum design in fluid mechanics, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 64, 1974, 97–100. doi: 10.1017/S0022112074002023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, T. T; Armstrong, C.G.; Chua, H. S.; Othmer, C.; Grahs, T.: Optimizing parameterized CAD geometries using sensitivities based on adjoint functions, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 9(3), 2012, 253–268. https://doi.org/10.3722/cadaps.2012.253-268
   Google Scholar
• Samareh, J.: Aerodynamic shape optimization based on free-form deformation, 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Stück, A.: Adjoint Navier-Stokes methods for hydrodynamic shape optimization. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Hamburg-Harburg, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-4630
   Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulos, I. Flassig; Reiche, K.: Aerodynamic Optimization of the TurboLab Stator: A Comparative Study between Conventional and Adjoint-based Approaches, In International Conference on Numerical Optimization Methods for Engineering Design NOED, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Verstraete, T.: CADO: a computer aided design and optimization tool for turbomachinery applications, In 2nd Int. Conf. on Engineering Optimization, 2010, 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, A.; Griewank, A.: Getting Started with ADOL-C, In Combinatorial scientific computing, Chapman & Hall/CRC Computational Science, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, 2012, 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11644-8
   Google Scholar
• Xu, S.; Wolfram, J.; Müller, J. D.: CAD-based shape optimization with CFD using a discrete adjoint, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 74(3), 2013, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.3844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, S.: CAD-based CFD shape optimization using discrete adjoint solvers, Ph.D. Thesis, Queen Mary University of London, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, S.; Radford, D.; Müller, J.-D.: CAD-based adjoint shape optimization of a one-stage turbine with geometric constraints, ASME Turbo Expo, 2015
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, C.; Byrd, R.H.; Lu, P.; Nocedal, J.: Algorithm 778: L-bfgs-b: Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound-constrained optimization, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 23, 1997, 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1145/279232.279236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TU Berlin Stator test case: http://aboutflow.sems.qmul.ac.uk/events/munich2016/benchmark/testcase3
   Google Scholar