Training Lay People to “Practice” Scripture Rhetorically: A Pedagogical Model with Biblical Precedent and Warrant from the Gospel of Matthew

Bibliography

• Anderson, J. C. 1983. ‘Matthew: Gender and Reading.’ Semeia 28: 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Byrskog, S. 1994. Jesus the Only Teacher: Didactic Authority and Transmission in Ancient Israel, Ancient Judaism, and the Matthean Community. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
   Google Scholar
• Cahalan, Kathleen. 2010. Introducing the Practice of Ministry. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, D. 2005. Writing on the Tablet of the Heart: Origins of Scripture and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chopp, R. S. 1998. ‘A Rhetorical Paradigm for Pedagogy.’ In Teaching the Bible, edited by F. Segovia and M. A. Tolbert, 299–309. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. D. and D. C. Allison. 1988–1997. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew; 3 vols. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1993. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M. 1987. Teaching and Religious Imagination: An Essay in the Theology of Teaching. San Francisco: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, S. 2014. ‘Transformative Learning as an ‘Inter-Practice’ Phenomenon.’ Adult Education Quarterly, 64 (2): 165–181. doi: 10.1177/0741713613520405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Japhet, S. 1993. I & II Chronicles: A Commentary. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kybird, P. 2006. ‘Using the Bible in Adult Christian Education.’ Journal of Adult Theological Education 3 (1): 49–59. doi: 10.1558/jate.2006.3.1.49
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levison, J.[R.]. 2013. Inspired: The Holy Spirit and the Mind of Faith. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, A. T. 1990. ‘Matthew — A Story for Teachers?’ In The Bible in Three Dimensions, edited by D. J. A. Clines, S. E. Fowl and S. E. Porter, 103–126. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luz, U. 1989–2005. Matthew: A Commentary. 3 vols. Minneapolis: Augsburg.
   Google Scholar
• Luz, U. 2005. ‘The Gospel of Matthew: A New Story of Jesus or a Rewritten One?’ In Studies in Matthew, edited by U. Luz, and R. Selle, 18–38. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, H. 1996. ‘Situated Learning: Multiple Perspectives.’ In Situated Learning Perspectives, edited by H. McLellan, 5–17. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Menken, M. J. J. 2004. ‘Isaiah and the ‘Hidden Things’: The Quotation from Psalm 78.2 in Matthew 13.35.’ In Matthew's Bible, edited by M. J. J. Menken, 89–104. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, J. A. 2006. ‘Transformational Adult Learning in Congregations.’ Journal of Adult Theological Education 3 (2): 163–178. doi: 10.1558/jate.2006.3.2.163
   Google Scholar
• Moyise, S. 2011. Jesus and Scripture: Studying the New Testament Use of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Orton, D. E. 1989. The Understanding Scribe: Matthew and the Apocalyptic Ideal. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quash, B. 2013. Found Theology: History, Imagination and the Holy Spirit. London : Bloomsbury T&T Clark.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, J. E. 2014. Forming a Community of Faith. New London, CT: Twenty-Third Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Riches, J. (ed.). 2010. What Is Contextual Bible Study? London: SPCK.
   Google Scholar
• Sim, D. C. 2011. ‘Matthew's Use of Mark: Did Matthew Intend to Supplement or to Replace His Primary Source?’ New Testament Studies 57 (2): 176–92. doi: 10.1017/S0028688510000366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2008. ‘Something That Can Be Learnt but Not Taught: Teaching Theological Reflection Through Enquiry-based Learning.’ Journal of Adult Theological Education 5 (1): 20–32. doi: 10.1558/jate2008v5i1.20
   Google Scholar
• Surburg, R. F. 1975. ‘Presuppositions of the Historical-Grammatical Method as Employed by Historic Lutheranism.’ Springfielder 38 (4): 278–288.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, K. 1997. Theories of Culture: A New Agenda for Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress.
   Google Scholar
• Trible, P. 1994. Rhetorical Criticism. Minneapolis: Fortress.
   Google Scholar
• Viviano, B. 1990. ‘The Gospel According to Matthew.’ In The New Jerome Bible Commentary, edited by R. E. Brown, J. A. Fitzmyer and R. E. Murphy, 630–674. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• wa Gatumu, K. 2013. ‘Pamoja Reading — In Community and in Context: Reflections from East Africa.’ In The Bible in the Life of the Church, edited by C. Amos, 22–31. Norwich: Canterbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wimbush, V. L. 2008. Theorizing Scriptures. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.
   Google Scholar