In situ gelling and mucoadhesive polymers: why do they need each other?

References

• Johnson TD, Christman KL. Injectable hydrogel therapies and their delivery strategies for treating myocardial infarction. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013 Jan 01;10(1):59–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayol L, Quaglia F, Borzacchiello A, et al. A novel poloxamers/hyaluronic acid in situ forming hydrogel for drug delivery: rheological, mucoadhesive and in vitro release properties. Eur J Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics. 2008;70(1):199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rençber S, Karavana SY, Şenyiğit ZA, et al. Mucoadhesive in situ gel formulation for vaginal delivery of clotrimazole: formulation, preparation, and in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Pharm Dev Technol. 2017 May 19;22(4):551–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruel-Gariépy E, Leroux J-C. In situ-forming hydrogels—review of temperature-sensitive systems. Eur J Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics. 2004 Sep 01;58(2):409–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RM, Kumar A, Pathak K. Mucoadhesive in situ nasal gelling drug delivery systems for modulated drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013;10(1):115–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J-A, Yeom J, Hwang BW, et al. In situ-forming injectable hydrogels for regenerative medicine. Prog Polym Sci. 2014;39(12):1973–1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenite A, Buschmann M, Wang D, et al. Rheological characterisation of thermogelling chitosan/glycerol-phosphate solutions. Carbohydr Polym. 2001;46(1):39–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braccini I, Pérez S. Molecular basis of Ca2+-induced gelation in alginates and pectins: the egg-box model revisited. Biomacromolecules. 2001 Dec 01;2(4):1089–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnürch A. Thiomers: a new generation of mucoadhesive polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005 Nov 03;57(11):1569–1582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KM, Shin YM, Joung YK, et al. In situ forming hydrogels based on tyramine conjugated 4-Arm-PPO-PEO via enzymatic oxidative reaction. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11(3):706–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong VX, Ablett MP, Richardson SM, et al. Simultaneous orthogonal dual-click approach to tough, in-situ-forming hydrogels for cell encapsulation. J Am Chem Soc. 2015 Feb 04;137(4):1618–1622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atuma C, Strugala V, Allen A, et al. The adherent gastrointestinal mucus gel layer: THICKNESS and physical state in vivo. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;280(5):G922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imam ME, Hornof M, Valenta C, et al. Evidence for the interpenetration of mucoadhesive polymers into the mucous gel layer. STP Pharma Sci. 2003;13(3):171–176.
   Google Scholar
• Singla AK, Chawla M, Singh A. Potential applications of carbomer in oral mucoadhesive controlled drug delivery system: a review. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2000 Jan 01;26(9):913–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klouda L, Mikos AG. Thermoresponsive hydrogels in biomedical applications. Eur J Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics. 2008;68(1):34–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H-R, Sung KC. Carbopol/pluronic phase change solutions for ophthalmic drug delivery. J Controlled Release. 2000 Dec 03;69(3):379–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl HE, Dünnhaupt S, Waldner C, et al. Preactivated thiomers for vaginal drug delivery vehicles. Biomaterials. 2013 Oct 01;34(32):7811–7818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abelson MB, Udell IJ, Weston JH. Normal human tear pH by direct measurement. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99(2):301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta P, Vermani K, Garg S. Hydrogels: from controlled release to pH-responsive drug delivery. Drug Discov Today. 2002;7(10):569–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson JR, Mlynek GM. Bioadhesive and phase-change polymers for ocular drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1995;16(1):45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Vyas SP. Carbopol/chitosan based pH triggered in situ gelling system for ocular delivery of timolol maleate. Sci Pharm. 2010;78(4):959–976.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiu Y-L, Chen S-C, Su C-J, et al. pH-triggered injectable hydrogels prepared from aqueous N-palmitoyl chitosan: in vitro characteristics and in vivo biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2009;30(28):4877–4888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayol L, Biondi M, Quaglia F, et al. Injectable thermally responsive mucoadhesive gel for sustained protein delivery. Biomacromolecules. 2010;12(1):28–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liow SS, Dou Q, Kai D, et al. Thermogels: in situ gelling biomaterial. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2(3):295–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Kim MH, Yoon YI, et al. One-pot synthesis of injectable methylcellulose hydrogel containing calcium phosphate nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;157(SupplementC):775–783.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarkar N. Thermal gelation properties of methyl and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. J Appl Polym Sci. 1979;24(4):1073–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matanović MR, Kristl J, Grabnar PA. Thermoresponsive polymers: insights into decisive hydrogel characteristics, mechanisms of gelation, and promising biomedical applications. Int J Pharm. 2014;472(1):262–275.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mura P, Mennini N, Nativi C, et al. In situ mucoadhesive-thermosensitive liposomal gel as a novel vehicle for nasal extended delivery of opiorphin. Eur J Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics. 2018;122:54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratieri T, Gelfuso GM, Rocha EM, et al. A poloxamer/chitosan in situ forming gel with prolonged retention time for ocular delivery. Eur J Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics. 2010;75(2):186–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor JM, Tomlins P, Sahota ST. Thermoresponsive Gels. Gels. 2017;3(1). DOI:10.3390/gels3010004
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Jiang S, Wang H, et al. A mucoadhesive, thermoreversible in situ nasal gel of geniposide for neurodegenerative diseases. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garala K, Joshi P, Shah M, et al. Formulation and evaluation of periodontal in situ gel. Int J Pharm Investig. 2013;3(1):29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlfors J, Edsman K, Petersson R, et al. Rheological evaluation of Gelrite® in situ gels for ophthalmic use. Eur J Pharml Sci. 1998;6(2):113–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsson M, Hägerström H, Edsman K. Rheological studies of the gelation of deacetylated gellan gum (Gelrite®) in physiological conditions. Eur J Pharm Sci. 1999 Oct 01;9(1):99–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni Y, Yates KM. In-situ gel formation of pectin. United States: (Grand Prairie, TX), inventor; Carrington Laboratories, Inc. (Irving, TX), assignee; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Qian L, Shu T, et al. Rheology characterization of sol–gel transition in aqueous alginate solutions induced by calcium cations through in situ release. Polymer. 2003;44(2):407–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintzen F, Laffleur F, Sakloetsakun D, et al. In situ gelling properties of anionic thiomers. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2012;38(12):1479–1485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnürch A, Hornof M, Guggi D. Thiolated chitosans. Eur J Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics. 2004;57(1):9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakloetsakun D, Hombach JMR, Bernkop-Schnürch A. In situ gelling properties of chitosan-thioglycolic acid conjugate in the presence of oxidizing agents. Biomaterials. 2009 Oct 01;30(31):6151–6157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel C, Jelkmann M, Laffleur F, et al. Nasal drug delivery: design of a novel mucoadhesive and in situ gelling polymer. Int J Pharm. 2017;517(1):196–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iqbal J, Shahnaz G, Dünnhaupt S, et al. Preactivated thiomers as mucoadhesive polymers for drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2012 Feb 01;33(5):1528–1535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi F-L, Shyu -S-S, Peng C-K. Characterization of ring-opening polymerization of genipin and pH-dependent cross-linking reactions between chitosan and genipin. J Polymer Sci A: Polymer Chem. 2005 May 15;43(10):1985–2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moura MJ, Figueiredo MM, Gil MH. Rheology of Chitosan and Genipin Solutions. Mater Sci Forum. 2008;587–588:27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Narita T, Yunoki S, Ohyabu Y, et al. In situ gelation properties of a collagen–genipin sol with a potential for the treatment of gastrointestinal ulcers. Medical Devices (Auckland, NZ). 2016;12/15(9):429–439. PubMed PMID: PMC5170602.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson SM, Bakaic E, Stewart SA, et al. Properties of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels cross-linked via strain-promoted alkyne–azide cycloaddition (SPAAC). Biomacromolecules. 2016 Mar 14;17(3):1093–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu M, Liu Y, Huang Y-C, et al. Fabrication of photo-crosslinkable glycol chitosan hydrogel as a tissue adhesive. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;181:668–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fancy DA, Kodadek T. Chemistry for the analysis of protein–protein interactions: rapid and efficient cross-linking triggered by long wavelength light. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1999;96(11):6020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogias IA, Williams AC, Khutoryanskiy VV. Why is chitosan mucoadhesive? Biomacromolecules. 2008;9(7):1837–1842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho FC, Bruschi ML, Evangelista RC, et al. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Braz J Pharm Sci. 2010;46(1):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig A. The use of mucoadhesive polymers in ocular drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005 Nov 03;57(11):1595–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RM, Kumar A, Pathak K. Thermally triggered mucoadhesive in situ gel of loratadine: β-cyclodextrin complex for nasal delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2013;14(1):412–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khutoryanskiy VV. Advances in mucoadhesion and mucoadhesive polymers. Macromol Biosci. 2011;11(6):748–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabovac V, Guggi D, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Comparison of the mucoadhesive properties of various polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1713–1723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiledar RR, Tagalpallewar AA, Kokare CR. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of xanthan gum-based bilayered mucoadhesive buccal patches of zolmitriptan. Carbohydr Polym. 2014 Jan 30;101(Supplement C):1234–1242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahajan HS, Tyagi VK, Patil RR, et al. Thiolated xyloglucan: synthesis, characterization and evaluation as mucoadhesive in situ gelling agent. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;91(2):618–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornof MD, Kast CE, Bernkop-Schnürch A. In vitro evaluation of the viscoelastic properties of chitosan–thioglycolic acid conjugates. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2003;55(2):185–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvát G, Gyarmati B, Berkó S, et al. Thiolated poly (aspartic acid) as potential in situ gelling, ocular mucoadhesive drug delivery system. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015;67:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav S, Ahuja M, Kumar A, et al. Gellan–thioglycolic acid conjugate: synthesis, characterization and evaluation as mucoadhesive polymer. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;99:601–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Kim K, Ryu JH, et al. Chitosan-catechol: a polymer with long-lasting mucoadhesive properties. Biomaterials. 2015 June 01;52(Supplement C):161–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu J, Strandman S, Zhu JXX, et al. Genipin-crosslinked catechol-chitosan mucoadhesive hydrogels for buccal drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2015 Jan 01;37(Supplement C):395–404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tirnaksiz F, Robinson J. Rheological, mucoadhesive and release properties of pluronic F-127 gel and pluronic F-127/polycarbophil mixed gel systems. Die Pharmazie-An Int J Pharm Sci. 2005;60(7):518–523.
   Google Scholar
• M.A. Fathalla Z, Vangala A, Longman M, et al. Poloxamer-based thermoresponsive ketorolac tromethamine in situ gel preparations: design, characterisation, toxicity and transcorneal permeation studies. Eur J Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics. 2017;114:119–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi H-G, Jung J-H, Ryu J-M, et al. Development of in situ-gelling and mucoadhesive acetaminophen liquid suppository. Int J Pharm. 1998;165(1):33–44.
   Google Scholar
• ElHady SA, Mortada ND, Awad GA, et al. Development of in situ gelling and mucoadhesive mebeverine hydrochloride solution for rectal administration. Saudi Pharm J. 2003;11(4):159–171.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira RRDA, Godoy R, Silva J, et al. Preparation and characterization of mucoadhesive thermoresponsive systems containing propolis for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102(4):1222–1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal J, Anantvar S, Narkhede M, et al. Formulation and evaluation of thermoreversible in-situ nasal gel of metoprolol succinate. IntJ Pharm Pharma Sci. 2011;3:96–102.
   Google Scholar
• Hirva S, Dhiren S, Jenisha V. Formulation of bioadhesive chitosan/pluronic thermosensitive in-situ gel for modified release of gatifloxacin. Indo Am J Pharm Res. 2016;6(10):6759–6765.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Liu J, Zhang X, et al. In situ gelling gelrite/alginate formulations as vehicles for ophthalmic drug delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010 Jun 01;11(2):610–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgamwar VS, Chauk DS, Mahajan HS, et al. Formulation and evaluation of in situ gelling system of dimenhydrinate for nasal administration. Pharm Dev Technol. 2009 June 01;14(3):240–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Cui Y, Zhang L, et al. Thermosensitive and mucoadhesive in situ gel based on poloxamer as new carrier for rectal administration of nimesulide. Int J Pharm. 2012;430(1):114–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ravi PR, Aditya N, Patil S, et al. Nasal in-situ gels for delivery of rasagiline mesylate: improvement in bioavailability and brain localization. Drug Deliv. 2015 Oct 03;22(7):903–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altuntaş E, Yener G. Formulation and evaluation of thermoreversible in situ nasal gels containing mometasone furoate for allergic rhinitis. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017 Oct 01;18(7):2673–2682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaki NM, Awad GA, Mortada ND, et al. Enhanced bioavailability of metoclopramide HCl by intranasal administration of a mucoadhesive in situ gel with modulated rheological and mucociliary transport properties. Eur J Pharml Sci. 2007;32(4):296–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi H, Chen W, Huang C, et al. Development of a poloxamer analogs/carbopol-based in situ gelling and mucoadhesive ophthalmic delivery system for puerarin. Int J Pharm. 2007;337(1):178–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fini A, Bergamante V, Ceschel GC. Mucoadhesive gels designed for the controlled release of chlorhexidine in the oral cavity. Pharmaceutics. 2011;3(4):665–679.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandri G, Cristina Bonferoni M, Ferrari F, et al. An in situ gelling buccal spray containing platelet lysate for the treatment of oral mucositis. Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2011;8(3):277–285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Das N, Madan P, Lin S. Development and in vitro evaluation of insulin-loaded buccal pluronic F-127 gels. Pharm Dev Technol. 2010;15(2):192–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassem AA, Issa DAE, Kotry GS, et al. Thiolated alginate-based multiple layer mucoadhesive films of metformin forintra-pocket local delivery: in vitro characterization and clinical assessment. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2017 Jan 02;43(1):120–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Wang X, Liu Y, et al. Thermosensitive in situ gel based on solid dispersion for rectal delivery of ibuprofen. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2018 Jan 01;19(1):338–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barichello JM, Morishita M, Takayama K, et al. Enhanced rectal absorption of insulin-loaded Pluronic® F-127 gels containing unsaturated fatty acids. Int J Pharm. 1999;183(2):125–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin H-R, Tseng C-C, Lin Y-J, et al. A novel in-situ-gelling liquid suppository for site-targeting delivery of anti-colorectal cancer drugs. J Biomater Sci. 2012;23(6):807–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho HJ, Balakrishnan P, Park EK, et al. Poloxamer/cyclodextrin/chitosan‐based thermoreversible gel for intranasal delivery of fexofenadine hydrochloride. J Pharm Sci. 2011;100(2):681–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsi N, Ghorab D, Refai H, et al. Ketoroloac tromethamine loaded nanodispersion incorporated into thermosensitive in situ gel for prolonged ocular delivery. Int J Pharm. 2016;506(1):57–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu Z, Li J, Nie S, et al. Study of an alginate/HPMC-based in situ gelling ophthalmic delivery system for gatifloxacin. Int J Pharm. 2006;315(1):12–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang JY, Oh Y-K, Choi H-G, et al. Rheological evaluation of thermosensitive and mucoadhesive vaginal gels in physiological conditions. Int J Pharm. 2002;241(1):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JY, Oh Y-K, Kong HS, et al. Prolonged antifungal effects of clotrimazole-containing mucoadhesive thermosensitive gels on vaginitis. J Controlled Release. 2002;82(1):39–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh Y-K, Park J-S, Yoon H, et al. Enhanced mucosal and systemic immune responses to a vaginal vaccine coadministered with RANTES-expressing plasmid DNA using in situ-gelling mucoadhesive delivery system. Vaccine. 2003;21(17):1980–1988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J-S, Oh Y-K, Kang M-J, et al. Enhanced mucosal and systemic immune responses following intravaginal immunization with human papillomavirus 16 L1 virus-like particle vaccine in thermosensitive mucoadhesive delivery systems. J Med Virol. 2003;70(4):633–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illum L. Nasal drug delivery—recent developments and future prospects. J Controlled Release. 2012;161(2):254–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JS, Oh YK, Yoon H, et al. In situ gelling and mucoadhesive polymer vehicles for controlled intranasal delivery of plasmid DNA. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59(1):144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan HS, Gattani S. In situ gels of metoclopramide hydrochloride for intranasal delivery: in vitro evaluation and in vivo pharmacokinetic study in rabbits. Drug Deliv. 2010;17(1):19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saindane NS, Pagar KP, Vavia PR. Nanosuspension based in situ gelling nasal spray of carvedilol: development, in vitro and in vivo characterization. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2013;14(1):189–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabal YM, Kamel AO, Sammour OA, et al. Effect of surface charge on the brain delivery of nanostructured lipid carriers in situ gels via the nasal route. Int J Pharm. 2014 Oct 01;473(1):442–457.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agrawal A, Gupta P, Khanna A, et al. Development and characterization of in situ gel system for nasal insulin delivery. Die Pharmazie-An Int J Pharm Sci. 2010;65(3):188–193.
   Google Scholar
• Shelke S, Shahi S, Jalalpure S, et al. Formulation and evaluation of thermoreversible mucoadhesive in-situ gel for intranasal delivery of naratriptan hydrochloride. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2015;29:238–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez AP, Mundiña-Weilenmann C, Romero EL, et al. Increased brain radioactivity by intranasal P-labeled siRNA dendriplexes within in situ-forming mucoadhesive gels. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:1373–1385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abouhussein DMN, Khattab A, Bayoumi NA, et al. Brain targeted rivastigmine mucoadhesive thermosensitive In situ gel: optimization, in vitro evaluation, radiolabeling, in vivo pharmacokinetics and biodistribution. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2018 Feb 01;43(Supplement C):129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Preeti K. Ocusert as A Novel Drug Delivery System. Int J Pharm Biol Archive. 2013;4:4.
   Google Scholar
• Saettone MF, Salminen L. Ocular inserts for topical delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1995 Aug 01;16(1):95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupenthal ID, Green CR, Alany RG. Comparison of ion-activated in situ gelling systems for ocular drug delivery. Part 1: physicochemical characterisation and in vitro release. Int J Pharm. 2011 June 15;411(1):69–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lou J, Hu W, Tian R, et al. Optimization and evaluation of a thermoresponsive ophthalmic in situ gel containing curcumin-loaded albumin nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:2517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta H, Aqil M, Khar R, et al. Nanoparticles laden in situ gel for sustained ocular drug delivery. J Pharm And Bioallied Sci. 2013 Apr 1;5(2):162–165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhowmik M, Kumari P, Sarkar G, et al. Effect of xanthan gum and guar gum on in situ gelling ophthalmic drug delivery system based on poloxamer-407. Int J Biol Macromol. 2013;62:117–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaich U, Jain N, Kumar D, et al. Controlled ocular drug delivery of ofloxacin using temperature modulated in situ gelling system. J Scientific Soc. 2013;40(2):90.
   Google Scholar
• Rupenthal ID, Alany RG, Green CR. Ion-activated in situ gelling systems for antisense oligodeoxynucleotide delivery to the ocular surface. Mol Pharm. 2011;8(6):2282–2290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pawar P, Kashyap H, Malhotra S, et al. Hp–CD-Voriconazole in situ gelling system for ocular drug delivery: in vitro, stability, and antifungal activities assessment. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Akiyama Y, Nagahara N, Nara E, et al. Evaluation of oral mucoadhesive microspheres in man on the basis of the pharmacokinetics of furosemide and riboflavin, compounds with limited gastrointestinal absorption sites. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998;50(2):159–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazaki S, Kubo W, Attwood D. Oral sustained delivery of theophylline using in-situ gelation of sodium alginate. J Controlled Release. 2000 Jul 03;67(2):275–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bothiraja C, Kumbhar V, Pawar A, et al. Development of floating in situ gelling system as an efficient anti-ulcer formulation: in vitro and in vivo studies. RSC Adv. 2015;5(37):28848–28856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajinikanth PS, Mishra B. Floating in situ gelling system for stomach site-specific delivery of clarithromycin to eradicate H. pylori. J Controlled Release. 2008 Jan 04;125(1):33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Chung HJ, Yeo S, et al. Thermo-sensitive, injectable, and tissue adhesive sol-gel transition hyaluronic acid/pluronic composite hydrogels prepared from bio-inspired catechol-thiol reaction. Soft Matter. 2010;6(5):977–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu JH, Lee Y, Kong WH, et al. Catechol-functionalized chitosan/pluronic hydrogels for tissue adhesives and hemostatic materials. Biomacromolecules. 2011 Jul 11;12(7):2653–2659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi S, Vigani B, Bonferoni MC, et al. Rheological analysis and mucoadhesion: a 30 year-old and still active combination. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018;156:232–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hombach J, Palmberger Thomas F, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Development and in vitro evaluation of a mucoadhesive vaginal delivery system for nystatin. J Pharm Sci. 2008 Feb 01;98(2):555–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar