Continuous monitoring of vital signs with the Everion biosensor on the surgical ward: a clinical validation study

References

• Jonsson T, Jonsdottir H, Möller AD, et al. Nursing documentation prior to emergency admissions to the intensive care unit. Nurs Crit Care. 2011;16:164–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kause J, Smith G, Prytherch D, et al. A comparison of antecedents to cardiac arrests, deaths and emergency intensive care admissions in Australia and New Zealand, and the United Kingdom - The ACADEMIA study. Resuscitation. 2004;62:275–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann L, Lippert A, Perner A, et al. Incidence, staff awareness and mortality of patients at risk on general wards. Resuscitation. 2008;77:325–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen LW, Kim WY, Chase M, et al. The prevalence and significance of abnormal vital signs prior to in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;98:112–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGain F, Cretikos MA, Jones D, et al. Documentation of clinical review and vital signs after major surgery. Med J Aust. 2008;189:380–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breteler MJM, Huizinga E, Van Loon K, et al. Reliability of wireless monitoring using a wearable patch sensor in high-risk surgical patients at a step-down unit in the Netherlands: a clinical validation study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimlichman E, Szyper-Kravitz M, Shinar Z, et al. Early recognition of acutely deteriorating patients in non-intensive care units: assessment of an innovative monitoring technology. J Hosp Med. 2012;7:628–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown H, Terrence J, Vasquez P, et al. Continuous monitoring in an inpatient medical-surgical unit: a controlled clinical trial. Am J Med. [Internet]. 2014;127:226–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey C, Randell R, Brown J, et al. Continuous versus intermittent vital signs monitoring using a wearable, wireless patch in patients admitted to surgical wards: pilot cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller RS, Foard KL, Harwood TN. Evaluation of a wireless, portable, wearable multi-parameter vital signs monitor in hospitalized neurological and neurosurgical patients. J Clin Monit Comput. [Internet]. 2018;32:945–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Joshi M, Khan SN, et al. Clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring in hospital wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J R Soc Med. 2020;113:217–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkinson PJ, Barber VS, Price JD, et al. A randomised controlled trial of the effect of continuous electronic physiological monitoring on the adverse event rate in high risk medical and surgical patients. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(11):1031–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellett J, Sebat F. Make vital signs great again – a call for action. Eur J Intern Med [Internet]. 2017;45:13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenen JPL, Leerentveld C, van Dijk JD, et al. Current evidence for continuous vital signs monitoring by wearable wireless devices in hospitalized adults: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi M, Ashrafian H, Aufegger L, et al. Wearable sensors to improve detection of patient deterioration. Expert Rev Med Devices. [Internet]. 2019;16:145–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soon S, Svavarsdottir H, Downey C, et al. Wearable devices for remote vital signs monitoring in the outpatient setting: an overview of the field. BMJ Innov. 2020; 6: 55.
   Google Scholar
• Biovotion AG. Everion. 2018 p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Leys C, Ley C, Klein O, et al. Detecting outliers: do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013;49:764–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dave D, Varma T. A review of various statistical methods for outlier detection. Int J Comput Sci Eng Technol. 2014;5:137–140.
   Google Scholar
• Sciences H, Bland JM, Altman DG. This is the twelfth in a series of occasional notes on medical statistics Department ofPublic statistics notes calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: part 1-correlation within subjects. British Medical Journal. 1995;310:1995.
   Google Scholar
• Schober P, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1763–1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17:571–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrios L, Oldrati P, Santini S, et al. Evaluating the accuracy of heart rate sensors based on photoplethysmography for in-the-wild analysis. ACM Int Conf Proc Ser 2019; 251–261.
   Google Scholar
• Kellett J, Li M, Rasool S, et al. Comparison of the heart and breathing rate of acutely ill medical patients recorded by nursing staff with those measured over 5 min by a piezoelectric belt and ECG monitor at the time of admission to hospital. Resuscitation. [Internet]. 2011;82:1381–1386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granholm A, Pedersen NE, Lippert A, et al. Respiratory rates measured by a standardised clinical approach, ward staff, and a wireless device. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60:1444–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weenk M, van Goor H, Frietman B, et al. Continuous monitoring of vital signs using wearable devices on the general ward: pilot study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2017;5:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L’Her E, N’Guyen QT, Pateau V, et al. Photoplethysmographic determination of the respiratory rate in acutely ill patients: validation of a new algorithm and implementation into a biomedical device. Ann Intensive Care. Internet]. 2019;9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0485-z
   Google Scholar
• Castaneda D, Esparza A, Ghamari M, et al., A review on wearable photoplethysmography sensors and their potential future applications in health care. 2018;Int J Biosens Bioelectron. 4:195–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leenen JPL, Dijkman EM, Van Dijk JD, et al. Feasibility of continuous monitoring of vital signs in surgical patients on a general ward: an observational cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021;11:2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey C, Ng S, Jayne D, et al. Reliability of a wearable wireless patch for continuous remote monitoring of vital signs in patients recovering from major surgery: a clinical validation study from the TRaCINg trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e031150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox EGM, Dieperink W, Wiersema R, et al. Temporal artery temperature measurements versus bladder temperature in critically ill patients, a prospective observational study. PLoS One. [Internet]. 2020;15:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlton PH, Bonnici T, Tarassenko L, et al. An assessment of algorithms to estimate respiratory rate from the electrocardiogram and photoplethysmogram. Physiol Meas. 2016;37:610–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelley KH, Jablonka DH, Awad AA, et al. What is the best site for measuring the effect of ventilation on the pulse oximeter waveform? Anesth Analg. 2006;103:372–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Goscinski T, Kalman S, et al. Combined photoplethysmographic monitoring of respiration rate and pulse: a comparison between different measurement sites in spontaneously breathing subjects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;070816180743003–???.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weenk M, Koeneman M, van de Belt TH, et al. Wireless and continuous monitoring of vital signs in patients at the general ward. Resuscitation. [Internet]. 2019;136:47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar