Towards an evaluation framework for medical device-integrated electronic medical record

References

• Choi JS, Lee JH, Park JH, et al. Design and implementation of a seamless and comprehensive integrated medical device interface system for outpatient electronic medical records in a general hospital. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80(4):274–285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliash C, Lazar I, Nissim N. SEC-C-U: the security of intensive care unit medical devices and their ecosystems. IEEE Access. 2020;8:64193–64224. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyles CR, Nelson EC, Frampton S, et al. Using electronic health record portals to improve patient engagement: research priorities and best practices. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(11_Supplement):S123–S129. doi: 10.7326/M19-0876
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abraham C, Chatterjee D, Sims RR. Muddling through cybersecurity: insights from the U.S. healthcare industry. Bus Horiz. 2019;62(4):539–548. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaqoob T, Abbas H, Atiquzzaman M. Security vulnerabilities, attacks, countermeasures, and regulations of networked medical devices—A review. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials. 2019;21(4):3723–3768. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2019.2914094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Meddicines Agency. Medical devices [internet]. Sci Med Heal. 2021. Available from. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/medical-devices
   Google Scholar
• Van Norman GA. Drugs and devices comparison of European and U.S. Approval processes. JACC. 2016;1(5):399–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.06.003
   Google Scholar
• FDASIA. Overview of medical device classification and reclassification [Internet]. FDA Organ. 2017 [cited 2022 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/cdrh-transparency/overview-medical-device-classification-and-reclassification.
   Google Scholar
• Yaqoob T, Abbas H, Shafqat N. Integrated Security, safety, and privacy risk assessment framework for medical devices. IEEE J Biomed Heal Informatics. 2020;24(6):1752–1761. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2952906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan S, Fernando A, Klonoff DC. Standards for medical device cybersecurity in 2018. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018;12(4):743–746. doi: 10.1177/1932296818763634
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pycroft L, Aziz TZ. Security of implantable medical devices with wireless connections: the dangers of cyber-attacks. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018;15(6):403–406. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1483235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willing M, Dresen C, Haverkamp U, et al. Analyzing medical device connectivity and its effect on cyber security in German hospitals. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020;20(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01259-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nzyoka BM, Mugo DM, Ng’ang’a SM. Medical device integration with electronic health records: a case study of university of Nairobi health services, Kenya. Int J Comput Technol. 2020;20:14–21. doi: 10.24297/ijct.v20i.8480
   Google Scholar
• Offner KL, Sitnikova E, Joiner K, et al. Towards understanding cybersecurity capability in Australian healthcare organisations: a systematic review of recent trends, threats and mitigation. Intell Natl Secur. 2020;35(4):556–585. doi: 10.1080/02684527.2020.1752459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weininger S, Jaffe MB, Goldman JM. HHS Public Access. Anesth Analg. 2018;124(1):127–135. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001386
   Google Scholar
• Yusof MM, Kuljis J, Papazafeiropoulou A, et al. An evaluation framework for health information systems: human, organisation and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). Int J Med Inform. 2008;77(6):386–398. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMahon ST, Cooper T, McCaffery F. Revising IEC 80001-1: risk management of health information technology systems. Comput Stand Interfaces. 2018;60:67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2018.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delone WH, Mclean ER. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res. 1992;3(1):60–95. doi: 10.1287/isre.3.1.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delone WH, Mclean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a Ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst. 2003;19:9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsadig M, Nassar DA, Menzli LJ. Healthcare information system assessment case study riyadh’s hospitals-KSA. Commun Comput Inf Sci. 2019;1098 CCIS:252–262.
   Google Scholar
• Ayebazibwe I, Kimaro HC, Kaasbøll JJ. System use and user satisfaction in the adoption of electronic medical records systems: a case of DHIS2 tracker implementation in Tanzania. IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol. 2019;551:63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Yang MH, Liu CY, Wang TJ, et al. A comparison of two cross-sectional studies on successful model of introducing nursing information system in a regional teaching hospital in Taiwan. CIN - Comput Informatics Nurs. 2022;40(8):571–579. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de León Castañeda CD. A socio-technical approach to evaluating an electronic medical record system implemented in the public health services of aguascalientes. Rev Mex Ing Biomed. 2020;41:40–52.
   Google Scholar
• Shim M, Jo HS. What quality factors matter in enhancing the perceived benefits of online health information sites? Application of the updated DeLone and McLean information systems success model. Int J Med Inform. 2020;137:104093. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JC, Lee TT, Mills ME. Evaluation of a barcode medication administration information system. CIN - Comput Informatics Nurs. 2018;36(12):596–602. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eivazzadeh S, Berglund JS, Larsson TC, et al. Most influential qualities in creating satisfaction among the users of health information systems: study in seven European Union countries. JMIR Med Informatics. 2018;6(4):2023. doi: 10.2196/11252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zibak A, Sauerwein C, Simpson A. A success model for cyber threat intelligence management platforms. Comput Secur. 2021;111:2023. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2021.102466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zahrani MS. Integrating is success model with cybersecurity factors for e-government implementation in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Int J Electr Comput Eng. 2020;10(5):4937–4955. doi: 10.11591/ijece.v10i5.pp4937-4955
   Google Scholar
• Scott Morton MS. The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Yusof MM. A case study evaluation of a critical care information system adoption using the socio-technical and fit approach. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84(7):486–499. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusof MM. A socio-technical and lean approach towards a framework for health information systems-induced error. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;257:508–512.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arifin A, Yusof MM. Error evaluation in the laboratory testing process and laboratory information systems. J Med Biochem. 2021;40(1):21–31. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-31382
   Google Scholar
• Rohani N, Yusof MM. Unintended consequences of pharmacy information systems: a case study. Int J Med Inform. 2023;170:170. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subhan A. ISO/IEC 80001 (risk management of medical devices on a network). J Clin Eng. 2016;41(3):117–118. doi: 10.1097/JCE.0000000000000165
   Google Scholar
• Hatcliff J, Zhang Y, Goldman JM Risk management objectives for distributed development of interoperable medical products. 2019 IEEE Symp Prod Compliance Eng SPCE Austin 2019; Austin, Texas. 2019; p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• NIST. NIST special publication 800-30 revision 1 - guide for conducting risk assessments. NIST Guide Conduct Risk Assessments. 2012;95:1–39. https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/30/r1/final
   Google Scholar
• Seale KA, McDonald JT, Glisson WB, et al. Meddevrisk: risk analysis methodology for networked medical devices. Hawaii Int Conf Syst Sci. 2018;2018-Janua:3271–3280.
   Google Scholar
• Mahler T, Elovici Y, Shahar Y. A new methodology for information security risk assessment for medical devices and its evaluation. ArXiv, abs/2002.06938. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Davis S, Shostack A. Threat modeling with STRIDE [internet]. Wiley; 2015. Available from: https://www.webtrends.com/blog/2015/04/threat-modeling-with-stride/
   Google Scholar
• Bickmore T, Schulman D, Yin L. Maintaining engagement in long-term interventions with relational agents. Appl Artif Intell. 2010;24(6):648–666. doi: 10.1080/08839514.2010.492259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine I, Rice M, Dunlap S, et al. A cyber risk scoring system for medical devices. Int J Crit Infrastruct Prot. 2017;19:32–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2017.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlSadrah SA. Electronic medical records and health care promotion in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2020;41(6):583–589. doi: 10.15537/smj.2020.6.25115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahal Alrehaili M, Zayyan Alsharqi O. The impact of upgrade towards comprehensive electronic medical record system on hospital performance: a single tertiary care center experience in Saudi Arabia. J Bus Manag Sci. 2021;9:17–30. doi: 10.12691/jbms-9-1-3
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal PKB, Giri B, Gupta P, et al. Integrated electronic health record system in a tertiary care centre: a single centre implementation experience. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022;60(248):413–415. doi: 10.31729/jnma.7445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Otaibi MN. Internet of things (IoT) Saudi Arabia healthcare systems: state-of-the-art, future opportunities and open challenges. J Health Inform Dev Ctries. 2019;13(1).
   Google Scholar
• ALKADI SH. The healthcare system in Saudi Arabia and its challenges: the case of diabetes care pathway |. J Health Inform Dev Ctries. 2016;10:1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Tatam M, Shanmugam B, Azam S, et al. A review of threat modelling approaches for APT-style attacks. Heliyon. 2021;7(1):e05969. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carden L, Oladapo B. An ethical risk management approach for medical devices. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:2311–2318. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S306698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy R, Garfield M, Rangarajan A, et al. The case of organisational innovation capability and health information technology implementation success: as you sow, so you reap? Int J Healthc Inf Syst Informatics. 2021;16:1–27. doi: 10.4018/IJHISI.20211001.oa21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afzal S, Arshad A. Ethical issues among healthcare workers using electronic medical records: a systematic review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed Updat [Internet]. 2021;1:100030. Available from. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpbup.2021.100030
   Google Scholar
• Sulmasy LS, López AM, Horwitch CA. Ethical implications of the electronic health record: in the service of the patient. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(8):935–939. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquemard T, Doherty CP, Fitzsimons MB. The anatomy of electronic patient record ethics: a framework to guide design, development, implementation, and use. BMC Med Ethics [Internet]. 2021;22:1–14. Available from. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00574-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik N, Hameed BMZ, Shetty DK, et al. Legal and ethical consideration in artificial intelligence in healthcare: who takes responsibility? Front Surg. 2022;9:1–6. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.862322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokinen A, Stolt M, Suhonen R. Ethical issues related to eHealth: an integrative review. Nurs Ethics. 2021;28(2):253–271. doi: 10.1177/0969733020945765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey A. Top 10 best practices for EHR ethical issues. Healthc Rep [Internet]. 2023;1–17. Available from: https://healthcare.report/articles/top-10-best-practices-for-ehr-ethical-issues
   Google Scholar