Which way forward? Comparing radiological outcomes using three different surgical approaches in robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty

References

• Wang Z, Hou JZ, Wu CH, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0929-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maratt JD, Gagnier JJ, Butler PD, et al. No difference in dislocation seen in anterior vs posterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(9):127–130. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(9):1634–1638. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart CJ, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(15):1392–1398. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.j.00557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao HY, Kang PD, Xia YY, et al. Comparison of early functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty using a direct anterior or posterolateral approach: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(11):3421–3428. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen CP, Jacobs CA. Comparison of patient function during the first six weeks after direct anterior or posterior total hip arthroplasty (THA): a randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(9):94–97. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez JA, Deshmukh AJ, Rathod PA, et al. Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(2):455–463. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3231-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng TE, Wallis JA, Taylor NF, et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial in total hip arthroplasty—comparing early results between the direct anterior approach and the posterior approach. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(3):883–890. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemesh SS, Robinson J, Keswani A, et al. The accuracy of digital templating for primary total hip arthroplasty: is there a difference between direct anterior and posterior approaches? J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(6):1884–1889. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin TJ, Bendich I, Ha AS, et al. A comparison of radiographic outcomes after total hip arthroplasty between the posterior approach and direct anterior approach with intraoperative fluoroscopy. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(2):616–623. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripuraneni KR, Munson NR, Archibeck MJ, et al. Acetabular abduction and dislocations in direct anterior vs posterior total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective, matched cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(10):2299–2302. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domb BG, El Bitar YF, Sadik AY, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(1):329–336. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3253-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Redmond JM, Hammarstedt JE, et al. Does robotic-assisted computer navigation affect acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty in the obese patient? A comparison study. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(12):2204–2207. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura N, Sugano N, Nishii T, et al. A comparison between robotic-assisted and manual implantation of cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(4):1072–1081. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1158-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, et al. The otto aufranc award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:8–22. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199810000-00003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu X, Zhang Z, Xu H, et al. A new designed full process coverage robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Int J Surg. 2024. doi: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001103
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Zhang Z, Wang G, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial on the accuracy of prosthesis positioning in total hip arthroplasty assisted by a newly designed whole-process robotic arm. Int Orthop. 2023;47(2):413–419. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05501-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meermans G, Konan S, Das R, et al. The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-b(6):732–740. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b6.38053
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han PF, Chen CL, Zhang ZL, et al. Robotics-assisted versus conventional manual approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int J Med Robot. 2019;15(3):e1990. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perets I, Walsh JP, Mu BH, et al. Short-term clinical outcomes of robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty: a pair-matched controlled study. Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):e236–e242. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20201119-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Bernardo LIC, Andy KS, et al. Robotic-arm assisted direct anterior total hip Arthroplasty; improving implant accuracy. Surg Technol Int. 2020;38:347–352. doi: 10.52198/21.sti.38.os1368
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010;1(2):100–107. doi: 10.4103/0976-500x.72352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen M, Luo Z, Ji X, et al. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position: our experiences and early results. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(1):131–138. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunze KN, Huddleston HP, Romero J, et al. Accuracy and precision of acetabular component position does not differ between the anterior and posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty with robotic assistance: a matched-pair analysis. Arthroplast Today. 2022;18:68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.08.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma M, Song P, Zhang S, et al. Does robot-assisted surgery reduce leg length discrepancy in total hip replacement? robot-assisted posterior approach versus direct anterior approach and manual posterior approach: a propensity score-matching study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03864-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minoda Y, Ohzono K, Aihara M, et al. Are acetabular component alignment guides for total hip arthroplasty accurate? J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(6):986–989. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto M, Kawasaki M, Okura T, et al. Comparison of accuracy of cup position using portable navigation versus alignment guide in total hip arthroplasty in supine position. Hip Int. 2021;31(4):492–499. doi: 10.1177/1120700020908788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nodzo SR, Chang CC, Carroll KM, et al. Intraoperative placement of total hip arthroplasty components with robotic-arm assisted technology correlates with postoperative implant position: a CT-based study. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-b(10):1303–1309. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.100b10-bjj-2018-0201.r1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Subramanian P, Wainwright TW, Bahadori S, et al. A review of the evolution of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2019;29(3):232–238. doi: 10.1177/1120700019828286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karunaratne S, Duan M, Pappas E, et al. The effectiveness of robotic hip and knee arthroplasty on patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2019;43(6):1283–1295. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4140-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avram GM, Prill R, Gurau CD, et al. Acetabular cup placement and offset control in robotic total hip arthroplasty performed through the modified anterolateral approach. Int Orthop. 2023;47(9):2265–2273. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05835-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendich I, Kapadia M, Alpaugh K, et al. Trends of utilization and 90-day complication rates for computer-assisted navigation and robotic assistance for total knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2010 to 2018. Arthroplast Today. 2021;11:134–139. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.08.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bendich I, Vigdorchik JM, Sharma AK, et al. Robotic assistance for posterior approach total hip arthroplasty is associated with lower risk of revision for dislocation when compared to manual techniques. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(6):1124–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasler J, Flury A, Dimitriou D, et al. Is revision total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach feasible? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140(8):1125–1132. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03469-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser D, Ried E, Zingg PO, et al. Acetabular reconstruction with femoral head autograft in primary total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach is a reliable option for patients with secondary osteoarthritis due to developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142(10):2957–2964. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04187-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh K, Weitlich JD, Zitsch BP, et al. Which surgical approach provides maximum visualization and access for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of femoral neck fractures? Injury. 2022;53(3):1131–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.11.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichstein PM, Kleimeyer JP, Githens M, et al. Does the Watson-Jones or modified Smith-Petersen approach provide superior exposure for femoral neck fracture fixation? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(7):1468–1476. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000533627.07650.bb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar