Comparative evaluation of blind supraglottic airway device insertion versus videolaryngoscope-guided technique in adults undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

References

• Gómez-Ríos MÁ, Sastre JA, Onrubia-Fuertes X, et al. Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), Spanish Society of Emergency and Emergency Medicine (SEMES) and Spanish Society of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC) Guideline for difficult airway management. Part II. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2024;S2341-1929(24):00022–2. doi: 10.1016/j.redare.2024.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Anand LK, Goel N, Singh M, et al. Comparison of the supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2016;54(2):44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2016.03.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choi SR, Lee TY, Kim SW, et al. Comparison of clinical performance of i-gel Ⓡ and Baska Mask Ⓡ during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Korean J Anesth. 2019;72(6):576–2. doi: 10.4097/kja.19195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim GW, Kim JY, Kim SJ, et al. Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind and laryngoscope-guided insertion. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1). doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0674-6
   Google Scholar
• Van Zundert AA, Wyssusek KH. Only with an optimal position of the supraglottic airway in situ, valid conclusions can be drawn about oropharyngeal airway pressure. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62(3):241–242. doi:10.4103/ija.IJA_135_18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Zundert AA, Gatt SP, Kumar CM, et al. ‘Failed supraglottic airway’: an algorithm for suboptimally placed supraglottic airway devices based on videolaryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(5):645–649. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brain AI. The laryngeal mask—a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth. 1983;55(8):801–805. doi:10.1093/bja/55.8.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shorten GD, Opie NJ, Graziotti P, et al. Assessment of upper airway anatomy in awake, sedated and anaesthetised patients using magnetic resonance imaging. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1994;22(2):165–169. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9402200208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustafa MA, Abdelhady MM. Fiberoptic assessment of the laryngeal mask airway (laryseal) position after one hour of positive pressure ventilation: an observational study. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26(6):480–484. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zundert AA, Wyssusek KH, Pelecanos A, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020;34(2):285–294. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00301-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosh P, Rajan S, Narayani N, et al. Ease and safety of securing airway by railroading proseal laryngeal mask airway over bougie versus traditional digital insertion technique. Anesth Essays Res. 2021;15(2):183–187. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_99_21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brimacombe J, Berry A. A proposed fiberoptic scoring system to standardize the assessment of laryngeal mask airway position. Anesth Analg. 1993;76(2):457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozgul U, Erdil FA, Erdogan MA, et al. Comparison of videolaryngoscope- guided versus standard digital insertion techniques of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway: a prospective randomized study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0915-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera BK, Misra S, Bellapukonda S, et al. Impact of visually guided versus blind techniques of insertion on the incidence of malposition of Ambu® AuraGain™ in paediatric patients undergoing day care surgeries: A prospective, randomised trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64(11):937–2. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_557_20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agrawal N, Singh GP, Saigal D. Comparison of Baska mask with Igel as a ventilatory device in adult patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Panacea J Med Sci. 2021;11(3):477–483.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli M, Wadhawan S, Bhadoria P, et al. Comparative evaluation of I-gel vs. endotracheal intubation for adequacy of ventilation in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019;35(1):30–35. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_249_17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyung PS, Geum K, Joo CG, et al. Comparison between supraglottic airway devices and endotracheal tubes in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine(Baltimore). 2016;95(33):e4598. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ari DE, Abitagaoglu S, Koksal C, et al. Comparison of i-gel and LMA protector in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Niger J Clin Pract. 2022;25(1):90–96. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_693_20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan G, Nayar P, Seth A, et al. Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA proseal. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29(1):56–60. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.105798
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar R, Binahi P, Mohammed S, et al. Comparison of clinical performance of c-mac video laryngoscope guided vs blind placement of i-gel® in paediatric patients: a randomized controlled open-label trial. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2023;51(4):347–353. doi: 10.4274/TJAR.2023.221010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maassen RL, Pieters BM, Maathuis B, et al. Endotracheal intubation using videolaryngoscopy causes less cardiovascular response compared to classic direct laryngoscopy, in cardiac patients according a standard hospital protocol. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2012;63(4):181–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gómez-Ríos MÁ, López T, Sastre JA, et al. Video laryngeal masks in airway management. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2022;19(11):847–858. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2142558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar