An analysis on control banding-based methods used for occupational risk assessment of nanomaterials

References

• Ahmadi Kanrash, F., S. Omari Shekaftik, A. Aliakbar, F. Soleimany, A. Haghighi Asl, W. Ebrahimi, and S. Amini Ravandi. 2022. “Comparative Risk Assessment of Tasks Involved with Nanomaterials Using NanoTool & Guidance Methods.” Journal of Chemical Health Risks 12: 371–378.
   Google Scholar
• Albuquerque, P. C., J. F. Gomes, C. A. Pereira, and R. M. Miranda. 2015. “Assessment and Control of Nanoparticles Exposure in Welding Operations by Use of a Control Banding Tool.” Journal of Cleaner Production 89: 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberio, G., S. Scalbi, P. Buttol, P. Masoni, and S. Righi. 2014. “Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Qualitative Risk Assessment: The Case Study of Alumina Nanofluid Production.” The Science of the Total Environment 496: 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleeker, E., M. Visser, M. Groenewold, G. Blab, D. Brouwer, Y. Sultan, C. Gagnon, K. Wilkinson, M. Doa, and W. Boyes. 2016. Physical-chemical properties of nanomaterials: Evaluation of methods applied in the OECD-WPMN Testing Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Boccuni, F., R. Ferrante, F. Tombolini, P. Pingue, A. Porcari, and S. Iavicoli. 2020. “Workers’ Exposure to Nano-Objects in R&D Laboratories: An Integrated Risk Management and Communication Approach.” Safety Science 129: 104793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouhoulle, E., T. Sinaba, R. Laruelle, M. Dalle, O. Aguerre-Chariol, H. Breulet, and O. Le Bihan. 2019. “Occupational Risk Assessment during Explosion Severity Tests of Carbon Black and MWCNT in a Laboratory.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1323 (1): 012008. IOP Publishinghttps://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1323/1/012008.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, D. H. 2012. “Control Banding Approaches for Nanomaterials.” The Annals of Occupational Hygiene 56 (5): 506–514. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mes039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugheri, S., G. Cappelli, L. Trevisani, S. Kemble, F. Paone, M. Rigacci, E. Bucaletti, D. Squillaci, N. Mucci, and G. Arcangeli. 2022. “A Qualitative and Quantitative Occupational Exposure Risk Assessment to Hazardous Substances during Powder-Bed Fusion Processes in Metal-Additive Manufacturing.” Safety, 8 (2): 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety8020032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. H., A. C. Eastlake, M. Story, and E. D. Kuempel. 2018. “Control Banding Tools for Engineered Nanoparticles: What the Practitioner Needs to Know.” Annals of Work Exposures and Health 62 (3): 362–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxy002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findik, F. 2021. “Nanomaterials and Their Applications.” Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN) 9 (3): 62–75. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v9i3.1837.
   Google Scholar
• Fingerhut, M. 2008. “Global Qualitative Risk Management (Control Banding) Activities.” Industrial Health 46 (4): 305–307. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.46.305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., H. Zou, Z. Zhou, W. Yuan, C. Quan, M. Zhang, and S. Tang. 2019. “Qualitative and Quantitative Differences between Common Control Banding Tools for Nanomaterials in Workplaces.” RSC Advances 9 (59): 34512–34528. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra06823f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D., and P. Mallery. 2019. “IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference.” New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Golbabai, F., N. Haydarnzhad, K. Sharfi, F. Shaahamdi, S. M. Hanifi, and B. Harati. 2015. “Occupational Exposure Risk Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterial’s by CB Nano Tool in a Nano, Research Laboratory.” Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 5: 133–138.
   Google Scholar
• Hartling, L., A. Milne, M. P. Hamm, B. Vandermeer, M. Ansari, A. Tsertsvadze, and D. M. Dryden. 2013. “Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale Showed Low Reliability between Individual Reviewers.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 66 (9): 982–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, H., T. Goto, N. Nakachi, H. Suzuki, T. Takebayashi, S. Kajiki, and K. Mori. 2007. “Evaluation of the Control Banding method - Comparison with Measurement-Based Comprehensive Risk Assessment.” Journal of Occupational Health 49 (6): 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.49.482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kentel, E., and M. Aral. 2004. “Probabilistic-Fuzzy Health Risk Modeling.” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 18 (5): 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-004-0187-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuroki, T., Y. Watanabe, H. Teranishi, S. Izumiyama, J. Amemura-Maekawa, and F. Kura. 2017. “Legionella Prevalence and Risk of Legionellosis in Japanese Households.” Epidemiology and Infection 145 (7): 1398–1408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268817000036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liguori, B. 2016. “Occupational exposure assessment of nanomaterials using control banding tools.” Phd Thesis. Technical University of Denmark; The National Research Centre for the Working Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Carson Ka-Lok, Dominik Mertz, and Mark Loeb. 2014. “Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: Comparing Reviewers’ to Authors’ Assessments.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 14 (1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luchini, C., B. Stubbs, M. Solmi, and N. Veronese. 2017. “Assessing the Quality of Studies in Meta-Analyses: Advantages and Limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale.” World Journal of Meta-Analysis 5 (4): 80–84. https://doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.80.
   Google Scholar
• Mccord, T. A., M. T. Legaspi, E. A. West, P. K. Yung, D. L. Larson, S. Y. Paik, and D. M. Zalk. 2021. “Quantitative Validation of Control Bands Using Bayesian Statistical Analyses.” Annals of Work Exposures and Health 65 (1): 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaa081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, Z., M. Vahabi, S. M. Sadat, and R. Zendehdel. 2021. “Risk Assessment of Nano-Flame Retardants Coating in the Selected Construction Industry of Iran by Control Banding Approach.” International Journal of Preventive Medicine 12: 96. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_186_19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motlagh, M. S., H. Aghaei, M. J. Assari, and M. S. M. Samar. 2017. “Designing and Developing a Software Package Based on Control Banding Method for Risk Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Nanomaterials.” Iran Occupational Health 14: 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Nasirzadeh, N., F. Golbabaei, and S. Omari Shekaftik. 2023. “Laboratory Activities Involving Nanomaterials: risk Assessment and Investigating Researchers Symptoms.” Nanoscale 15 (6): 2674–2689. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2nr06118j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omari Shekaftik, S., H. Jadid, M. J. Dehdashti, Y. Mohammadian, and W. Ebrahimi. 2023. “Toward a Minimum Data Set for Assessing the Risks of Activities Involved with Nanomaterials.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 25 (2): 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-023-05674-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omari Shekaftik, S., N. Nasirzadeh, T. Baba-Ahangar, M. Najaflou, Z. Beigzadeh, M. J. Dehdashti, H. Noori, et al. 2022. “Academic Nanotechnology Laboratories: investigating Good Practices and Students’ Health Status.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 24 (9): 177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-022-05548-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omari Shekaftik, S., Z. Sedghi Noushabadi, and A. Ashtarinezhad. 2022. “Nanosafety: A Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) Study among Iranian Researchers Working in Nanotechnology Laboratories.” International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics: JOSE 28 (4): 2541–2545. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.2005958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oremus, M., Oremus, C. Hall, G. B. Mckinnon, M. C. E. C. T., and T. E. A. M. C. S. R. 2012. “Inter-Rater and Test–Retest Reliability of Quality Assessments by Novice Student Raters Using the Jadad and Newcastle–Ottawa Scales.” BMJ Open, 2 (4): e001368. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omari Shekaftik, S., R. Yarahmadi, N. Moghadasi, Z. Sedghi Noushabadi, A. F. Hosseini, and A. Ashtarinezhad. 2020. “Investigation of Recommended Good Practices to Reduce Exposure to Nanomaterials in Nanotechnology Laboratories in Tehran, Iran.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 22 (3): 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-4764-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omari Shekaftik, S., A. Ashtarinezhad, F. H. Shirazi, A. Hosseini, and R. Yarahmadi. 2021. “Assessing the Risk of Main Activities of Nanotechnology Companies by the NanoTool Method.” International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics: JOSE 27 (4): 1145–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2019.1693778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik, S. Y., D. M. Zalk, and P. Swuste. 2008. “Application of a Pilot Control Banding Tool for Risk Level Assessment and Control of Nanoparticle Exposures.” The Annals of Occupational Hygiene 52 (6): 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/men041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastorino, R., S. Milovanovic, J. Stojanovic, L. Efremov, R. Amore, and S. Boccia. 2016. “Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: results of a Systematic Evaluation.” PloS One 11 (5): e0154217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., V. Welch, M. Losos, and P. Tugwell. 2011. “The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses.” Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 2: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, C. A. 2008. Review of Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2.2. 027).
   Google Scholar
• Prichystalova, R., S. Bernatikova, L. Sikorova, M. Jonasova, L. Maslakova, and T. Brzicova. 2016. “Preliminary Health Risk Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Nanoparticles in Electronic Waste Processing.” NANOCON 2016 - Conference Proceedings, 8th International Conference on Nanomaterials - Research and Application, 619–626.
   Google Scholar
• Qu, C., B. Li, H. Wu, S. Wang, and F. Li. 2016. “Probabilistic Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediments from China’s Major Aquatic Bodies.” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 30 (1): 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1087-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radka, P., Sarka, B. Veronika, H. Lenka, and S. Sgem. 2016. “Occupational Exposure Assessment of Nanomaterials: Lessons Learned from Czech Case Studies.” SGEM 2016, BK 1: Psychology and Psychiatry, SOcialogy and Healthcare, Education Conference Proccedings, Vol II
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Kirsten, Hubert Rauscher, Agnieszka Mech, Juan Riego Sintes, Douglas Gilliland, Mar González, Peter Kearns, et al. 2018. “Physico-Chemical Properties of Manufactured nanomaterials-Characterisation and Relevant Methods. An Outlook Based on the OECD Testing Programme.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology: RTP 92: 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.10.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez Jiménez, A., J. Varet, C. Poland, G. J. Fern, S. M. Hankin, and M. VAN Tongeren. 2016. “A Comparison of Control Banding Tools for Nanomaterials.” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 13 (12): 936–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2016.1200191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, K. 2014. “Chapter 1 - General Introduction.” In Handbook of Nanosafety, edited by U. Vogel, K. Savolainen, Q. WU, M. Van Tongeren, D. Brouwer, and M. BERGES. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, F., S. P. B. Sousa, P. Arezes, P. Swuste, M. C. S. Ribeiro, and J. S. Baptista. 2015b. “Qualitative Risk Assessment during Polymer Mortar Test Specimens preparation - Methods Comparison.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 617: 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/617/1/012037.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, F., P. Arezes, and P. Swuste. 2015a. “Risk Assessment in a Research Laboratory during Sol-Gel Synthesis of nano-TiO2.” Safety Science 80: 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeone, F. C., M. Blosi, S. Ortelli, and A. L. Costa. 2019. “Assessing Occupational Risk in Designs of Production Processes of Nano-Materials.” NanoImpact 14: 100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2019.100149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, M., P. Arezes, and F. Silva. 2021. “Occupational Exposure to Ultrafine Particles in Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Assessment.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (18): 9788. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stang, A. 2010. “Critical Evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the Assessment of the Quality of Nonrandomized Studies in Meta-Analyses.” European Journal of Epidemiology 25 (9): 603–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STATNANO. 2022. NANOTECHNOLOGY PUBLICATIONS (ARTICLE) [Online]. StatNano. Available: https://statnano.com/report/s29 [Accessed].
   Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, A. B., V. A. Hackley, G. Roebben, K. Ehara, S. Hankin, M. T. Postek, I. Lynch, W.-E. Fu, T. P. Linsinger, and A. F. Thünemann. 2013. “Nanoscale Reference Materials for Environmental, Health and Safety Measurements: needs, Gaps and Opportunities.” Nanotoxicology, 7 (8): 1325–1337. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2012.739664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westmeier, D., S. K. Knauer, R. H. Stauber, and D. Docter. 2017. “Chapter 1 - Bio–Nano Interactions.” In Adverse Effects of Engineered Nanomaterials, edited by B. Fadeel, A. Pietroiusti, and A. A. Shevedova, 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yarahmadi, R., R. A. Dizaji, A. A. Farshad, F. Teimuri, and M. Soleimani. 2013. “Occupational Risk Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials by Control Banding Method in Chemistry Laboratories.” Journal of American Science, 9: 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Zalk, D. M., and D. I. Nelson. 2008. “History and Evolution of Control Banding: A Review.” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 5 (5): 330–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620801997916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalk, D. M., S. Y. Paik, and W. D. Chase. 2019. “A Quantitative Validation of the Control Banding Nanotool.” Annals of Work Exposures and Health 63 (8): 898–917. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxz057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalk, D. M., and P. Swuste. 2020. “Barrier Banding: A Concept for Safety Solutions Utilizing Control Banding Principles.” ACS Chemical Health & Safety 27 (4): 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.9b00021.
   Google Scholar
• Zalk, D. M., S. Y. Paik, and P. Swuste. 2009. “Evaluating the Control Banding Nanotool: A Qualitative Risk Assessment Method for Controlling Nanoparticle Exposures.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 11 (7): 1685–1704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9678-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalk, D. 2010. Control Banding: A simplified, qualitative strategy for the assessment of occupational risks and selection of solutions. Delft, Netherlands: TU Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Zalk, D. M., and S. Y. Paik. 2011. “Risk Assessment Using Control Banding.” In Assessing Nanoparticle Risks to Human Health, edited by Gurumurthy Ramachandran, 139–166. Oxford: William Andrew Publishing.
   Google Scholar