Categorization framework to aid hazard identification of nanomaterials

References

• Aitken RJ, Creely KS, Tran CL. Nanoparticles: An occupational hygiene review prepared by the Institute of Occupational Medicine for the Health and Safety Executive 2004. 274. 2004. Sudbury, Health and Safety Executive. Research Report.
   Google Scholar
• Baggs RB, Ferin J, Oberdörster G. Regression of pulmonary lesions produced by inhaled titanium dioxide in rats. Veterinary Pathol 1997; 34: 592–597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker C, Pradhan A, Pakstis L, Pochan DJ, Shah SI. Synthesis and antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2005; 5: 244–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck-Speier I, Dayal N, Karg E, Maier KL, Roth C, Ziesenis A, Heyder J. Agglomerates of ultrafine particles of elemental carbon and TiO2 induce generation of lipid mediators in alveolar macrophages. Environ Health Perspect 2001; 109: 613–618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry CC, Wells S, Charles S, Aitchison G, Curtis ASG. Cell response to dextran-derivatised iron oxide nanoparticles post internalisation. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 5405–5413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry CC, Wells S, Charles S, Curtis ASG. Dextran and albumin derivatised iron oxide nanoparticles: influence on fibroblasts in vitro. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 4551–4557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuer O, Sundararaj U. Big returns from small fibers: A review of polymer/carbon nanotube composites. Polymer Composites 2004; 25: 630–645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner TJ, Wick P, Manser P, Spohn P, Grass RN, Limbach LK, Bruinink A, Stark WJ. In vitro cytotoxicity of oxide nanoparticles: Comparison to asbestos, silica, and the effect of particle solubility. Environ Sci Technol 2006; 40: 4374–4381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng MD. Effects of nanophase materials (< = 20 nm) on biological responses. J Environ Sci Health Part A:Toxic/Hazardous Substances Environ Engineering 2004; 39: 2691–2705
   Google Scholar
• Chorkendorff I, Niemantsverdriet JW. Concepts of modern catalysis and kinetics. Wiley-VCH, New York 2003
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Official Journal 1967, 16/08/1967 P. 0001-0098. Accessed 23-8-2006.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 of 23 March 1993 on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances. OJ No. L 84/ 1. 5-4-1993. Accessed 23-8-2006.
   Google Scholar
• Derfus AM, Chan WCW, Bhatia SN. Probing the cytotoxicity of semiconductor quantum dots. Nano Lett 2004; 4: 11–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskimergen R, Mortensen K, Vigild ME. Shear instability of a gyroid diblock copolymer. Macromolecules 2005; 38: 1286–1291
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Technical Guidance Document in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. 2003. Ispra, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Environmental Agency. 2001. Late lessons form early warning: The precautionary principle 1986–2000. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Fortner JD, Lyon DY, Sayes CM, Boyd AM, Falkner JC, Hotze EM, Alemany LB, Tao YJ, Guo W, Ausman KD, Colvin VL, Hughes JB. C-60 in water: Nanocrystal formation and microbial response. Environ Sci Technol 2005; 39: 4307–4316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadegaard N, Mosler S, Larsen NB. Biomimetic polymer nanostructures by injection molding. Macromolec Materials Engineering 2003; 288: 76–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghatnekar-Nilsson S, Forsen E, Abadal G, Verd J, Campabadal F, Perez-Murano F, Esteve J, Barniol N, Boisen A, Montelius L. Resonators with integrated CMOS circuitry for mass sensing applications, fabricated by electron beam lithography. Nanotechnology 2005; 16: 98–102
   Google Scholar
• Hamley I. The physics of block copolymers. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1998
   Google Scholar
• Jordan A, Wust P, Scholz R, Tesche B, Fahling H, Mitrovics T, Vogl T, CervosNavarro J, Felix R. Cellular uptake of magnetic fluid particles and their effects on human adenocarcinoma cells exposed to AC magnetic fields in vitro. Int J Hyperthermia 1996; 12: 705–722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasemo B, Gold J. Implant surfaces and interface processes. Adv Dental Res 1999; 12: 8–20
   Google Scholar
• Lam CW, James JT, McCluskey R, Arepalli S, Hunter RL. A review of carbon nanotube toxicity and assessment of potential occupational and environmental health risks. Crit Rev Toxicol 2006; 36: 189–217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CW, James JT, McCluskey R, Hunter RL. Pulmonary toxicity of single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation. Toxicol Sci 2004; 77: 126–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockman PR, Koziara JM, Mumper RJ, Allen DD. Nanoparticle surface charges alter blood-brain barrier integrity and permeability. J Drug Target 2004; 12: 635–641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin FJ, Melnik K, West T, Shapiro J, Cohen M, Boiarski AA, Ferrari M. Acute toxicity of intravenously administered microfabricated silicon dioxide drug delivery particles in mice. Drugs Res Develop 2005; 6: 71–81
   Google Scholar
• Maynard AD, Aitken RJ. Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities and future requirements. Nanotoxicology 2007; 1: 26–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller G, Archer C, Pica R, Bell D, Senjen R, Kimbrell G. 2006. Nanomaterials, sunscreen and cosmetics: Small ingredients, big risks Report. Friends of the Earth.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen MW, Sorensen PG, Bjorkdahl O, Jensen MR, Gundersen HJ, Bjornholm T. Preparation and characterization of Boron carbide nanoparticles for use as a novel agent in T cell-guided boron neutron capture therapy. Appl Radiat Isotopes 2006; 64: 315–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanoscale Science Engineering and Technology Subcommittee, The Committee on Technology, National Science and Technology Committee. The National Nanotechnology Initiative Strategy Plan December 2004. Arlington, VA: National Nanotechnology Coordination Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006; 311: 627
   Google Scholar
• Nigavekar SS, Sung LY, Llanes M, El-Jawahri A, Lawrence TS, Becker CW, Balogh L, Khan MK. H-3 dendrimer nanoparticle organ/tumor distribution. Pharmaceut Res 2004; 21: 476–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster E. Manufactured nanomaterials (Fullerenes, C-60) induce oxidative stress in the brain of juvenile largemouth bass. Environ Health Perspect 2004; 112: 1058–1062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 2005a; 113: 823–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster G, Maynard A, Donaldson K, Castranova V, Fitzpatrick J, Ausman K, Carter J, Karn B, Kreyling W, Lai D, Olin S, Monteiro-Riviere N, Warheit D, Yang H. 2005b. Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: Elements of a screening strategy. Partic Fibre Toxicol 2.
   Google Scholar
• Oberdörster G, Sharp Z, Atudorei V, Elder A, Gelein R, Kreyling W, Cox C. Translocation of inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain. Inhalation Toxicol 2004; 16: 445
   Google Scholar
• Powers KW, Brown SC, Krishna VB, Wasdo SC, Moudgil BM, Roberts SM. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials. Part VI. Characterization of nanoscale particles for toxicological evaluation. Toxicol Sci 2006; 90: 296–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies [Internet]. 2006. A Nanotechnology Consumer Products Inventory. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Accessed 28 August 2006 from the website: http://www.nanotechproject.org/44.
   Google Scholar
• Renn O. 2004. Public perception of nanotechnology. In: Nanotechnologies: A preliminary risk analysis on the basis of a workshop organized in Brussels on 1–2 March 2004 by the Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General of the European Commission (European Commission Community Health and Consumer Protection). Brussels: European Communities. pp 123–126.
   Google Scholar
• Sayes CM, Fortner JD, Guo W, Lyon D, Boyd AM, Ausman KD, Tao YJ, Sitharaman B, Wilson LJ, Hughes JB, West JL, Colvin VL. The differential cytotoxicity of water-soluble fullerenes. Nano Lett 2004; 4: 1881–1887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayes CM, Gobin AM, Ausman KD, Mendez J, West JL, Colvin VL. Nano-C-60 cytotoxicity is due to lipid peroxidation. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 7587–7595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiotz J, Jacobsen KW. A maximum in the strength of nanocrystalline copper. Science 2003; 301: 1357–1359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Royal Society and The Royal Academy of Engineering. Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. 2004. London: The Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Tsuji JS, Maynard AD, Howard PC, James JT, Lam CW, Warheit DB, Santamaria AB. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, Part IV: Risk assessment of nanoparticles. Toxicol Sci 2006; 89: 42–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2004) . 2004. Risk Assessment Principles and Practice – An Examination of EPA Risk Assessment Principles and Practices. Staff Paper Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by members of the Risk Assessment Task Force. EPA/100/B-04/001. . Washington, DC: Office of the Science Advisor U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Wardak A, Rejeski D. 2003. Nanotechnology & regulation. A case study using the Toxic Substance Control Act TSCA. 2003. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Foresight and Governance Project. 25-8-2005.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe J [Internet]. 2006. Top Ten Nanotech Products. Forbes. Accessed 1 June 2006 from the website: http://www.forbes.com/2005/01/12/cz_jw_0112soapbox.html.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu J-G. New heights for hard disk drives. Materials Today 2003; 6: 22–31
   Google Scholar