Fast prediction of turbine energy acquisition capacity under combined action of wave and current based on digital twin method

References

• Badshah M, Badshah S, Jan S. 2020. Comparison of computational fluid dynamics and fluid structure interaction models for the performance prediction of tidal current turbines. J Ocean Eng Sci. 5(2):164–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahaj AS, Molland AF, Chaplin JR, Batten WMJ. 2007. Power and thrust measurements of marine current turbines under various hydrodynamic flow conditions in a cavitation tunnel and a towing tank. Renew Energy. 32(3):407–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Liu A, Yu X, Liu Z, Tang X, Wang S. 2021. Experimental tests and CFD simulations of a horizontal wave flow turbine under the joint waves and currents. Ocean Eng. 237:109480. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Tang X, Gaidai O, Wang F. 2022. Digital twin real time monitoring method of turbine blade performance based on numerical simulation. Ocean Eng. 263:112347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo B, Wang D, Zhou J, Shi W, Zhou X. 2020. Performance evaluation of a submerged tidal energy device with a single mooring line. Ocean Eng. 196:106791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo H, Chen M, Mohamed K, Qu T, Wang S, Li J. 2021. A digital twin-based flexible cellular manufacturing for optimization of air conditioner line. J Manuf Syst. 58:65–78. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour P, Hosseinpour M, Sharifi Y. 2022. Artificial neural networks for predicting ultimate strength of steel plates with a single circular opening under axial compression. Ships Offsh Struct. 17(11):2454–2469. doi:10.1080/17445302.2021.2000265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HH, Kim HJ, Paik JK. 2022. Use of physical testing data for the accurate prediction of the ultimate compressive strength of steel stiffened panels. Ships Offsh Struct. doi:10.1080/17445302.2022.2087358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Fang S, Dong H, Xu C. 2021. Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. J Manuf Syst. 58:346–361. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd C, Allmark M, Ordonez-Sanchez S, Martinez R, Johnstone C, Germain G, Gaurier B, Mason-Jones A, O'Doherty T. 2021. Validation of the dynamic load characteristics on a tidal stream turbine when subjected to wave and current interaction. Ocean Eng. 222:108360. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Li T, Zhang L, Sheng Q, Zhang X, Jiang J. 2016. Experimental study on hydrodynamic characteristics of vertical-axis floating tidal current energy power generation device. Chin Ocean Eng. 30(5):749–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masilamani R, Nallayarasu S. 2022. Simplified methods for the strength of ring-stiffened tubular T/Y-joints. Ships Offsh Struct. doi:10.1080/17445302.2022.2087358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melikoglu M. 2018. Current status and future of ocean energy sources: a global review. Ocean Eng. 148:563–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty A, Viswavandy M, KRay P, Mohanty S. 2016. Reactive power control and optimisation of hybrid off shore tidal turbine with system uncertainties. J Ocean Eng Sci. 1(4):256–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park HA, Byeon G, Son W, Jo HC, Kim J, Kim S. 2020. Digital twin for operation of microgrid: optimal scheduling in virtual space of digital twin. Energies. 13(20):5504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi Q, Tao F. 2018. Digital twin and big data towards smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: 360 degree comparison. IEEE Access. 6:3585–3593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi Q, Tao F, Hu T, Anwer N, Liu A, Wei Y, Wang L, Nee AYC. 2021. Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. J Manuf Syst. 58:3–21. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos V, Giannini G, Calheiros CT, Rosa SP, Taveira PF. 2021. Legal framework of marine renewable energy: a review for the Atlantic region of Europe. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 137:110608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos V, Ringwood JV. 2016. Implementation and evaluation of the international electrotechnical commission specification for tidal stream energy resource assessment: a case study. Energy Convers Manage. 127:66–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng Q, Jing F, Zhang L, Zhou N, Wang S, Zhang Z. 2016. Study of the hydrodynamic derivatives of vertical-axis tidal current turbines in surge motion. Renewable Energy. 96:366–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun K, Ma G, Wang H, Li Z. 2019. Hydrodynamic performance of a vertical axis tidal current turbine with angular speed fluctuation. Ships Offsh Struct. 14:S311–S319. doi:10.1080/17445302.2019.1589975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Liu T, Xie Y, Zhang D, Xia X. 2021. Real-time power prediction approach for turbine using deep learning techniques. Energy. 233:121130. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki T, Mahfuz H. 2018. Analysis of large-scale ocean current turbine blades using fluid-structure interaction and blade element momentum theory. Ships Offsh Struct. 13(5):451–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao F, Zhang M, Liu Y, Nee AYC. 2018. Digital twin driven prognostics and health management for complex equipment. Cirp Annals – Manufact Technol. 67(1):169–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uihlein A, Magagna D. 2016. Wave and tidal current energy – a review of the current state of research beyond technology. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 58:1070–1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah H, Hussain M, Abbas N, Ahmad H, Amer M, Noman M. 2019. Numerical investigation of modal and fatigue performance of a horizontal axis tidal current turbine using fluid-structure interaction. J Ocean Eng Sci. 4(4):328–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen A, Fischedick M, Moomaw W, Weir T, Nadaï A, Nilsson LJ, Nyboer J, Sathaye J. 2010. Renewable energy costs, potentials, barriers: conceptual issues. Energy Policy. 38(2):850–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Sun K, Sheng Q, Zhang L, Wang S. 2016. The effects of yawing motion with different frequencies on the hydrodynamic performance of floating vertical-axis tidal current turbines. Appl Ocean Res. 59:224–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang P, Xiang J, Fang F, Pain CC. 2019. A fidelity fluid-structure interaction model for vertical axis tidal turbines in turbulence flows. Appl Energy. 236:465–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Wang J, Lin Y, Si Y, Huang C, Yang J, Huang B, Li W. 2017. Present situation and future prospect of renewable energy in China. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 76:865–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Zhou L, Horn BKP. 2021. Building a right digital twin with model engineering. J Manuf Syst. 59:151–164. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Yan J, Feng D. 2019. Digital twin framework and its application to power grid online analysis. CSEE J Power Energy Syst. 5(3):391–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar