Joint Audit: Issues and Challenges for Researchers and Policy-Makers

References

• Aktiebolagslag. (2005) Aktiebolagslag 2005:551 (Sweden: Swedish Companies Act).
   Google Scholar
• AMF. (2011) Etude relative aux honoraires versés aux commissaires aux comptes et à leur réseau au titre de la période 2010 par les groupes du CAC 40, de l'eurostoxx 50 et d'un échantillon de 42 sociétés des compartiments b et c d'eurolist [Survey of fees paid to statutory auditors and their networks for 2010 by CAC 40 and Eurostoxx 50 companies and by a sample of 42 companies in the B and C compartments of Eurolist] (Paris: Autorité des Marchés Financiers).
   Google Scholar
• André, P., Broye, G., Pong, C. K. M. and Schatt, A. (2012) Are joint audits associated with higher audit fees? Working paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=203900 (accessed 31 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Audousset-Coulier, S. (2008) La publication des honoraires d'audit par les sociétés cotées françaises, déterminants de la publication volontaire et du niveau des honoraires [Determinants of the voluntary disclosure audit fees and audit pricing in a joint audit setting], Ph.D. dissertation, HEC, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Audousset-Coulier, S. (2012) ‘Two big’ or not ‘two big’? The consequences of appointing two Big 4 auditors on audit pricing in a joint audit setting. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2083871 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2083871 (accessed 12 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ballas, A. A. and Fafaliou, I. (2008) Market shares and concentration in the EU auditing industry: the effect of Andersen's demise, International Advances in Economic Research, 14(October), pp. 485–497. doi: 10.1007/s11294-008-9167-6
   Google Scholar
• Banks Amendment Act. (2003) Banks Amendment Act, South Africa, Act no. 19 of 2003, sec. 42. Available at: http://www.info.gov.za/view/DownloadFileAction?id=67994 (accessed 12 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, V., Goodacre, A. and Fearnley, S. (2003) And then there were four: a study of UK audit market concentration – causes, consequences and the scope for market adjustment, Journal of Financial Regulation & Compliance, 11(3), pp. 250–265. doi: 10.1108/13581980310810561
   Google Scholar
• Becker, C. L., Defond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J. and Subramanyam, K. R. (1998) The effect of audit quality on earnings management, Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), pp. 1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00547.x
   Google Scholar
• Bédard, J., Piot, C. and Schatt, A. (2012) Was the European Commission Green Paper right? An evaluation of the French experience with joint auditing. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2165595 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2165595 (accessed 12 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bennecib, J. (2004) De l'efficacité du co-commissariat aux comptes [On the efficiency of joint audit], Ph.D. dissertation, Dauphine University, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Bennouri, M., Nekhili, M. and Touron, P. (2012) Does auditors’ reputation discourage related party transactions? The French case. (March 20, 2012). 2012 Financial Markets & Corporate Governance Conference. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1823464 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1823464 (accessed 12 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Boone, J. P., Khurana, I. K. and Raman, K. K. (2012) Audit market concentration and auditor tolerance for earnings management, Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(4), pp. 1171–1203. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01144.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broye, G. (2007) Concentration du marché de l'audit: Un état des lieux [Audit market concentration in France: A state of the art], Revue Française de Comptabilité, no. 399, pp. 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, R. H. and McGrath, N. T. (1992) Audit quality attributes: the perceptions of audit partners, preparers, and financial statement users, Auditing, 11(1), pp. 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Companies Act. (2008) Companies Act (Act n°71 of 2008), South Africa. Available at: http://www.saica.co.za/Portals/0/Technical/LegalAndGovernance/Act 71 2008 Companies Act.pdf (accessed 12 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Craswell, A. T. (1999) Does the provision of non-audit services impair auditor independence? International Journal of Auditing, 3(1), pp. 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Financial Statement Act. (2001) Forslag til lov om erhvervsdrivende virksomheders aflæggelse af årsregnskab m.V. (årsregnskabsloven), §135 [The proposal to the Danish Financial Statements Act, §135].
   Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. E. (1981) Auditor size and audit quality, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), pp. 183–199. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
   Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L. and Francis, J. R. (2005) Audit research after Sarbanes-Oxley, Auditing, 24(supplement), pp. 5–30. doi: 10.2308/aud.2005.24.Supplement.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L. and Park, C. (2001) The reversal of abnormal accruals and the market valuation of earnings surprises, The Accounting Review, 76(3), pp. 375–404. doi: 10.2308/accr.2001.76.3.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K. and Subramanyam, K. R. (2002) Do non–audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions, Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), pp. 1247–1274. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.00088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, M., Lu, T., Simunic, D. A. and Ye, M. (2012) Do joint audits improve or impair audit quality? December 29, 2012, Rotman School of Management Working Paper No. 2111710; CAAA Annual Conference 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2111710 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2111710
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2001) A study on systems of civil liability of statutory auditors in the context of a single market for auditing services in the European union (Brussels: European Commission). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/auditing/docs/liability/auditliability_en.pdf (accessed 12 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2010) Green paper: audit policy: lessons from the crisis, 13th of October 2010, European Commission, Brussels, pp. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2011a) Restoring confidence in financial statements: the European Commission aims at a higher quality, dynamic and open audit market, 30 November 2011, European Commission, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2011b) Summary of responses Green paper – audit policy: lessons from the crisis, 4th February 2011, European Commission, Brussels, pp. 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2012) Draft report on the proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the Council on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities, com(2011)0779 – c7 0470/2011 – 2011/0359(cod), September, 9, 2012. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FNONSGML%2BCOMPARL%2BPE-494.551%2B02%2BDOC%2BPDF%2BV0%2F%2FEN (accessed 25 August 2013).
   Google Scholar
• FEE. (2011) Federation of European Accountants: Briefing paper: standing for trust and integrity. Available at: http://www.fee.be/fileupload/upload/Briefing Paper 04 Appointment of the Auditor 11063062011582130.pdf (accessed 12 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Försäkringsrörelselag. (2010) Försäkringsrörelselag 2010:2043 (Sweden: The Swedish Insurance Business Act).
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (2004) What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36(4), pp. 345–368. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2004.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (2011) A framework for understanding and researching audit quality, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 30(2), pp. 125–132. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J., LaFond, R. Z., Olsson, P. and Schipper, K. (2005) The market pricing of accruals quality, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), pp. 295–327. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Michas, P. N. and Seavey, S. E. (2013) Does audit market concentration harm the quality of audited earnings? Evidence from audit markets in 42 countries, Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), pp. 325–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Vanstraelen, A. and Richard, C. (2009) Assessing France's joint audit requirement: are two heads better than one? Auditing, 28(2), pp. 35–63. doi: 10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. and Wang, D. (2008) The joint effect of investor protection and Big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world, Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), pp. 157–191. doi: 10.1506/car.25.1.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonthier-Besacier, N. and Schatt, A. (2007) Determinants of audit fees for French quoted firms, Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(2), pp. 139–160. doi: 10.1108/02686900710718654
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica, 47(1), pp. 153–161. doi: 10.2307/1912352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoL. (2011) Auditors: market concentration and their role, March, HL Paper 119–I, House Of Lords Select Committee on Economic Affairs, The Stationery Office Limited, London.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, C. and Thinggaard, F. (2011) Joint audits–benefit or burden? Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1702867 (accessed 31 August 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Holm, C. and Thinggaard, F. (2012) Balancing auditor choices during the transition from a mandatory to a voluntary joint audit system in Denmark. Available at: http://aaahq.org/AM2012/display.cfm?Filename=SubID_1740.pdf&MIMEType=application%2Fpdf (accessed 15 August 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Holm, C. and Warming-Rasmussen, B. (2008) An account of accountants. Audit regulation and the audit profession in Denmark, in: R. Quick et al. (Eds) Auditing, Trust and Governance – Regulation in Europe, pp. 42–77 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Huber, N. (2011) The concentration battle, International Accounting Bulletin May, pp. 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., Kausar, A., Loft, A. and Woods, M. (2011) Regulating audit beyond the crisis: a critical discussion of the EU Green paper, European Accounting Review, 20(3), pp. 431–457. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2011.597201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ittonen, K. and Peni, E. (2012) Auditor's gender and audit fees, The International Journal of Auditing, 16(1), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2011.00438.x
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. (1991) Earnings management during import relief investigations, Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), pp. 193–228. doi: 10.2307/2491047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, J. (2011) Audit quality and cost of debt capital for private firms: evidence from Finland, International Journal of Auditing, 15(1), pp. 88–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2010.00424.x
   Google Scholar
• Kida, T. (1980) An investigation into auditors’ continuity and related qualification judgments, Journal of Accounting Research, 18(2), pp. 506–523. doi: 10.2307/2490590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lag om bank- och finansieringsrörelse. (2004) Lag om bank- och finansieringsrörelse, #297 (Sweden: The Swedish Banking and Financing Business Act).
   Google Scholar
• Le Maux, J. (2004) Le co-commissariat aux comptes à la française [The French model of joint audit], Revue Française de Comptabilité, 266, pp. 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lesage, C. and Ratzinger-Sakel, N. (2012) Are the findings of international studies reliable? The joint audit example. Working paper (Germany: HEC Paris, France and Ulm University).
   Google Scholar
• Lesage, C., Ratzinger-Sakel, N. and Kettunen, J. (2012) Struggle over joint audit: on behalf of public interest? Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2176729 (accessed 12 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Lobo, G. L., Paugam, L. and Casta, J.-F. (2013) Impact of joint auditor pair on timely loss recognition: evidence from impairment tests. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1985541 (accessed 12 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Maggina, A. (2012) Joint audit in Greece: evidence from Greek listed companies. Available at: http://aaahq.org/AM2012/display.cfm?Filename=SubID_292.pdf&MIMEType=application%2Fpdf (accessed 12 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Marmousez, S. (2008) Le choix de la composition du collège des commissaires aux comptes: Déterminants et conséquences [Determinants and consequences of the auditor pair choice in a joint audit setting], Ph.D. dissertation, HEC Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Marmousez, S. (2012) Examining a French exception: the determinants of the choice of joint-auditors (in French), Comptabilité – Contrôle – Audit, 18(1), pp. 121–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutchler, J. F. (1984) Auditors’ perceptions of the going-concern opinion decision, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 3(2), pp. 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEP-100. (2011) Arrêté du 10 avril 2007 published in J.O. n° 103 from 3 Mai 2007, modified 3 August 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, L. (2002) Do firms pay for audit riskEvidence on risk premiums in audit fees after direct control for audit effort, International Journal of Auditing, 6(1), pp. 37–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2002.tb00004.x
   Google Scholar
• Palmrose, Z.-V. (1986) Audit fees and auditor size: further evidence, Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), pp. 97–110. doi: 10.2307/2490806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piot, C. (2003) Coûts d'agence et changements de commissaire aux comptes: Une approche empirique [Agency costs and auditor change: an empirical approach], Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 9(2), pp. 5–30. doi: 10.3917/cca.092.0005
   Google Scholar
• Piot, C. (2007) Auditor concentration in a joint-audit environment: the French market 1997–2003, Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(2), pp. 161–176. doi: 10.1108/02686900710718663
   Google Scholar
• Piot, C. (2008) Concentration et compétitivité du marché de l'audit en France : Une étude longitudinale 1997–2003 [Concentration and competition of the French audit market: a longitudinal study 1997–2003], Finance Contrôle stratégie, 11(4), pp. 31–64.
   Google Scholar
• Quick, R. (2012) EC Green paper proposals and audit quality, Accounting in Europe, 9(1), pp. 17–38. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2012.664398
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. J. (2001) The Canadian audit market in the first half of the twentieth century, Accounting Historians Journal, 28(2), pp. 109–139.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. (2008) Auditor independence and auditor-provided tax service: evidence from going-concern audit opinions prior to bankruptcy filings, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), pp. 31–54. doi: 10.2308/aud.2008.27.2.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelleman, C. and Knechel, W. R. (2010) Short-term accruals and the pricing and production of audit services, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 29(1), pp. 221–250. doi: 10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammari, B. A., Yaqout, A. A. and Hussaini, A. A. (2008) Determinants of audit fees in Kuwait, Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 8(1), pp. 140–152.
   Google Scholar
• Simunic, D. A. (1980) The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence, Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), pp. 161–190. doi: 10.2307/2490397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thinggaard, F. and Kiertzner, L. (2008) Determinants of audit fees: evidence from a small capital market with a joint audit requirement, International Journal of Auditing, 12(2), pp. 141–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00377.x
   Google Scholar
• Wolk, C. M., Michelson, S. E. and Wooton, C. W. (2001) Auditor concentration and market shares in the US: 1988–1999 a descriptive note, The British Accounting Review, 33(2), pp. 157–174. doi: 10.1006/bare.2001.0159
   Google Scholar
• Zerni, M., Haapamäki, E., Järvinen, T. and Niemi, L. (2012) Do joint audits improve audit quality? Evidence from voluntary joint audits, European Accounting Review, 21(4), pp. 731–765. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.678599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerni, M., Kallunki, J.-P. and Nilsson, H. (2010) The entrenchment problem, corporate governance mechanisms, and firm value, Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(4), pp. 1169–1206. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar