Equity and Liabilities – A Discussion of IAS 32 and a Critique of the Classification

References

• Alexander, D. and Jermakowicz, E. (2006) A true and fair view of the principles/rules debate, Abacus, 32(2), pp. 132–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00195.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Accounting Association (1993) Response to the FASB discussion memorandum ‘distinguishing between liability and equity instruments and accounting for instruments with characteristics of both’, Accounting Horizons, 7(3), pp. 105–113.
   Google Scholar
• American Accounting Association (1999) Comment letter to the FASB: liability and equity, Accounting Horizons, 13(3), pp. 305–307. doi: 10.2308/acch.1999.13.3.305
   Google Scholar
• American Accounting Association (2001) Evaluation of the FASB's proposed accounting for financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities, equity, or both, Accounting Horizons, 15(4), pp. 387–400. doi: 10.2308/acch.2001.15.4.387
   Google Scholar
• Barckow, A., Schmidt, M., Kampmann, H., Peerless, S. and Weller, H. (2008) Distinguishing between Equity and Liabilities. European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), Accounting Standards Committee of Germany (DRSC) et al. (Eds), Berlin/Brussels. Available at www.efrag.org (accessed 30 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2011) Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems. Revised version June 2011 (Basel: Bank for international settlements).
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, W. H., Kettler, P. and Scholes, M. (1970) The association between market determined and accounting determined risk measures, The Accounting Review, 45(4), pp. 654–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botosan, C. A. and Plumlee, M. A. (2005) Assessing alternative proxies for the expected risk premium, The Accounting Review, 80(1), pp. 21–53. doi: 10.2308/accr.2005.80.1.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botosan, C. A., Koonce, L., Ryan, S. G., Stone, M. S. and Wahlen, J. M. (2005) Accounting for liabilities: conceptual issues, standard setting, and evidence from academic research, Accounting Horizons, 19(3), pp. 159–186. doi: 10.2308/acch.2005.19.3.159
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K. C. and Seow, G. S. (1997) Debt and equity characteristics of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 8(1), pp. 37–49. doi: 10.1023/A:1008240603745
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Q., Frischmann, P. and Warfield, T. (2003) The market perception of corporate claims, Accounting Regulation, 16, pp. 3–28. doi: 10.1016/S1052-0457(02)16001-2
   Google Scholar
• Choi, F. D. S. and Levich, R. M. (1991) The Capital Market Effects of International Accounting Diversity (New York: Salomon Brothers Center for the Study of Financial Institutions).
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, A., Rosellón, M. and Verwijmeren, P. (2006) The impact of IAS 32 on preference shares in the Netherlands, Accounting in Europe, 3(1), pp. 169–185. doi: 10.1080/09638180600920350
   Google Scholar
• Engel, E., Erickson, M. and Maydew, E. (1999) Debt–equity hybrid securities, Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), pp. 249–274. doi: 10.2307/2491409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young Financial Reporting Group (2013) International GAAP 2013: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles under International Financial Reporting Standards (Chichester and New York: John Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2004) Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions. On the promotion of co-operative societies in Europe. COM (2004) 18 final, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. (1983) Agency problems and residual claims, Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), pp. 327–349. doi: 10.1086/467038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons, A. P. and Latshaw, C. A. (2004) Financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity, Bank Accounting & Finance, 17(5), pp. 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Givoly, D. and Palmon, D. (1981) Convertible debt as common stock equivalents – a retrospective analysis of APB opinion 15, Journal of Accounting Research, 19(2), pp. 530–543. doi: 10.2307/2490879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, E. and Hopkins, P. (1998) Comprehensive income reporting and analysts’ valuation judgments, Journal of Accounting Research, 36(3), pp. 47–75. doi: 10.2307/2491306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, F., Hopkins, P. and Pratt, J. (2003) The Credibility of Accounting Classification: Determinants and Consequences. Working paper, University of Washington, Seattle, Indiana University, Bloomington, 14 March 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, P. E. (1996) The effect of financial statement classification of hybrid financial instruments on financial analysts’ stock price judgments, Journal of Accounting Research, 34(3), pp. 33–50. doi: 10.2307/2491424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, J., Macve, R. and Serafeim, G. (2011) ‘Deprival value’ vs. ‘fair value’ measurement for contract liabilities: how to resolve the ‘revenue recognition’ conundrum? Accounting and Business Research, 41(5), pp. 491–514. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2011.603206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp. 305–360. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, J. (1984) The Definition and Recognition of Liabilities. Accounting Theory monograph, 4, Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, P. and Warfield, T. D. (1993) Variation in attributes of redeemable preferred stock: implications for accounting standards, Accounting Horizons, 7(2), pp. 30–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, P. and Warfield, T. D. (1995) The usefulness of hybrid security classifications: evidence from redeemable preferred stock, The Accounting Review, 70(1), pp. 151–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, W. C. (2011) What drives firms’ decisions to lobby and determinants of their lobbying positions: evidence from firms’ comment letter submissions during FASB's stock option expensing proposal in 2004, The International Journal of Accounting, 46(1), pp. 1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.intacc.2010.12.003
   Google Scholar
• KPMG International Financial Reporting Group (2012) Insights into IFRS. KPMG's practical guide to International Financial Reporting Standards, 9th ed. 2012/2013 (London: Sweet & Maxwell).
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, J. (2003) The CF and accounting standards: the persistence of discrepancies, Abacus, 39(3), pp. 298–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2003.00134.x
   Google Scholar
• Maines, L. and McDaniel, L. (2000) Effects of comprehensive-income characteristics on nonprofessional investor's judgements: the role of financial-statement presentation format, The Accounting Review, 75(2), pp. 179–207. doi: 10.2308/accr.2000.75.2.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt, C. and Wiedmann, C. (2005) Earnings management through transaction structuring: contingent convertible debt and diluted earnings per share, Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), pp. 205–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00168.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobes, C. (2003) Liabilities and Their Measurement in UK and International Accounting Standards. Report commissioned by the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, Certified Accountants Educational Trust, London.
   Google Scholar
• Nobes, C. (2011) On relief value (deprival value) versus fair value measurement for contract liabilities: a comment and a response, Accounting and Business Research, 41(5), pp. 515–524. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2011.623280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, A., Emery, D. R. and Lee, Y. W. (1993) Firm performance and security type in seasoned offerings: an empirical examination of alternative information-signaling models, Journal of Financial Research, 16(3), pp. 181–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paton, W. A. (1922) Accounting Theory – with Special Reference to the Corporate Enterprise (New York: The Ronald Press).
   Google Scholar
• Penno, M. C. (2008) Rules and accounting: vagueness in conceptual frameworks, Accounting Horizons, 22(3), pp. 339–351. doi: 10.2308/acch.2008.22.3.339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (2011) Manual of Accounting, Financial Instruments, 2012 ed. (Haywards Heath: Bloomsbury Professional).
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, M. E. (1973) A mean-variance synthesis of corporate financial theory, The Journal of Finance, 28(1), pp. 167–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01356.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A. K. (1996) Creative compliance in financial reporting, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(1), pp. 23–29. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(95)00015-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terando, W., Shaw, W. and Smith, D. (2007) Valuation and classification of company issued cash and share-puts, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 29(3), pp. 223–240. doi: 10.1007/s11156-007-0033-z
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. (2003) Constructing, persuading and silencing: the rhetoric of accounting standards, Accounting, Organizations & Society, 28(6), pp. 621–638. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00016-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. (2006) Making up users, Accounting, Organizations & Society, 31(6), pp. 579–600. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2005.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar