3,383
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

IFRS Ten Years on: Has the IASB Imposed Extensive Use of Fair Value? Has the EU Learnt to Love IFRS? And Does the Use of Fair Value make IFRS Illegal in the EU?Footnote

References

  • Ahmed, K., Chalmers, K., & Khalif, H. (2013). A meta-analysis of IFRS adoption effects. International Journal of Accounting, 48(2), 173–217.
  • Aisbitt, S., & Nobes, C. (2001). The true and fair requirement in recent national implementations. Accounting and Business Research, 31(2), 83–90.
  • Amel-Zadeh, A., & Meeks, G. (2013). Bank failure, mark-to-market and the financial crisis. Abacus, 49(3), 308–339.
  • André, P., Cazavan-Jeny, A., Dick, W., Richard, C., & Walton, P. (2009). Fair value accounting and the banking crisis: Shooting the messenger. Accounting in Europe, 6(1), 3–24.
  • Arden, M. (1993). The true and fair requirement opinion. Published as an appendix to ‘foreword to accounting standards’. London: Accounting Standards Board.
  • Barker, R. (2010). On the definitions of income, expenses and profit in IFRS. Accounting in Europe, 7(2), 147–158.
  • Bischof, J., & Daske, H. (2015). IFRS endorsement criteria in relation to IFRS 9. Brussels: European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies
  • Bompas, G. (2013). International Financial Reporting Standards (issues arising in relation to the Companies Act 2006). Retrieved September 28, 2015 from http://www.lapfforum.org/press/ifrs-opinion
  • Burlaud, A., & Colasse, B. (2011). International accounting standardisation: Is politics back? Accounting in Europe, 8(1), 23–47.
  • Cairns, D. (2006). The use of fair value in IFRS. Accounting in Europe, 3(1), 5–22.
  • Cairns, D., Massoudi, D., Taplin, R., & Tarca, A. (2011). IFRS fair value measurement and accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia. British Accounting Review, 43(1), 1–21.
  • Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. (2007). Financial reporting and global capital markets: A history of the international accounting standards committee, 1973–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. (2015). Aiming for global accounting standards: The International Accounting Standards Board, 2001–2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Choi, Y., Peasnell, K., & Toniato, J. (2013). Has the IASB been successful in making accounting earnings more useful for prediction and valuation? UK evidence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 40(7–8), 741–768.
  • Crump, R. (2013). Battle over ‘prudence’ isolates the IASB. Accountancy Age, 17. October. Retrieved September 28, 2015 http://www.accountancyage.com/aa/blog-post/2301329/battle-over-prudence-isolates-the-iasb
  • Crump, R. (2015, March 30). MEPs urge EC to investigate conflicts between IFRS and EU law. Accountancy Age. Retrieved September 23, 2015 http://www.accountancyage.com/aa/news/2397006/meps-urge-ec-to-investigate-conflicts-between-ifrs-and-eu-law
  • Cuijpers, R., & Buijink, W. (2005). Voluntary adoption of non-local GAAP in the European Union: A study of determinants and consequences. European Accounting Review, 14(3), 487–524.
  • Diggle, G. & Nobes, C. W. (1994). European rule-making in accounting: The seventh directive as a case study. Accounting and Business Research, 24(96), 319–333.
  • Durocher, S., & Gendron, Y. (2014). Epistemic commitment and cognitive disunity toward fair-value accounting. Accounting and Business Research, 44(6), 630–655.
  • Evans, L., Baskerville, R., & Nara, K. (2015). Colliding worlds: Issues relating to language translation in accounting and some lessons from other disciplines. Abacus, 51(1), 1–36.
  • Flower, J. (1997). The future shape of harmonization: The EU versus the IASC versus the SEC. European Accounting Review, 6(2), 281–303.
  • Gebhardt, G. (2012). Financial instruments in non-financial firms: What do we know? Accounting and Business Research, 42(3), 267–289.
  • Glaum, M., Baetge, J., Grothe, A., & Oberdörster, T. (2013). Introduction of International Accounting Standards, disclosure quality and accuracy of analysts’ earnings forecasts. European Accounting Review, 22(1), 79–116.
  • Haller, A., & Eierle, B. (2004). The adaptation of German accounting rules to IFRS: A legislative balancing act. Accounting in Europe, 1(1), 27–50.
  • Hassan, E., Rankin, M., & Lu, W. (2014). The development of accounting in Iraq and the IFRS adoption decision: An institutional perspective. International Journal of Accounting, 49(3), 371–390.
  • Hellman, N. (2008). Accounting conservatism under IFRS. Accounting in Europe, 5 (1–2), 71–100.
  • Hitz, J.-M. (2007). The decision usefulness of fair value accounting – a theoretical perspective. European Accounting Review, 16(2), 323–362.
  • Hoarau, C. (1995). International accounting harmonisation: American hegemony or mutual recognition with benchmarks?. European Accounting Review, 4(2), 217–233.
  • Hoffmann, L., & Arden, M. (1983). Legal opinion on true and fair. Accountancy, 94(1083), 154–156.
  • Hopwood, A. G. (1994). Some reflections on ‘The harmonisation of accounting within the EU’. European Accounting Review, 3(2), 241–253.
  • IASB. (2010). The conceptual framework for financial reporting. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
  • IASC. (1989). Framework for the preparation and presentation of financial statements. London: International Accounting Standards Committee.
  • ICAEW. (2010). Guidance on the determination of realised profits and losses in the context of distributions under the Companies Act 2006, Tech 02/10. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
  • ICAEW. (2015). The effects of mandatory IFRS adoption in the EU: A review of empirical research. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Retrieved from http://www.icaew.com/~/media/corporate/files/technical/financial%20reporting/information%20for%20better%20markets/ifbm/effects%20of%20mandatory%20ifrs%20adoption%20april%202015%20final.ash)
  • IFRS Foundation. (2015). IFRS application around the world: Jurisdiction profile: Switzerland. London: Author. Retrieved May 26, 2015 from http://www.ifrs.org/Use-around-the-world/Documents/Jurisdiction-profiles/Switzerland-IFRS-Profile.pdf
  • Kleekämper, H. (2000). IASC – Das Trojanische Pferd der SEC? In W. Ballwieser (Ed.), US-amerikanische Rechnungslegung: Grundlagen und Vergleiche mit deutschem Recht (4th ed., pp. 467–484). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
  • Kvaal, E., & Nobes, C. W. (2010). International differences in IFRS policy choice. Accounting and Business Research, 40(2), 173–187.
  • Landsman, W. R. (2007). Is fair value accounting information relevant and reliable? Evidence from capital market research. Accounting and Business Research, 37 (Supplement 1), 19–30.
  • Li, S. (2010). Does mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards in the European Union reduce the cost of equity capital? Accounting Review, 85(2), 607–636.
  • Martinez-Diaz, L. (2005). Strategic experts and improvising regulators explaining the IASC's rise to global influence, 1973–2001. Business and Politics, 7(3), 1–26.
  • Maystadt, P. (2014). Should IFRS standards be more “European”? Retrieved May 26, 2015 http://ec.europa.eu/finance/accounting/docs/governance/reform/131112_report_en.pdf
  • Moore, M. (2008). The true and fair requirement revisited. London: Financial Reporting Council.
  • Morais, A. I. (2008). Actuarial gains and losses: The choice of the accounting method. Accounting in Europe, 5(1/2), 127–139.
  • Nobes, C. W. (1993). The origins of the harmonising provisions of the 1980 and 1981 Companies Acts. Accounting and Business Research, 24(93), 43–53.
  • Nobes, C. W. (2009). The importance of being fair: An analysis of IFRS regulation and practice. Accounting and Business Research, 39(4), 415–427.
  • Nobes, C. W., & Stadler, C. (2013). How arbitrary are international accounting classifications? Lessons from centuries of classifying in many disciplines, and experiments with IFRS data. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(8), 573–595.
  • Olson, W. E. (1982). The accounting profession – years of trial: 1969–1980. New York, NY: AICPA.
  • Penman, S. H. (2007). Financial reporting quality: Is fair value a plus or a minus? Accounting and Business Research, 37(Supplement 1), 33–44.
  • Power, M. (2010). Fair value accounting, financial economics and the transformation of Reliability. Accounting and Business Research, 40(3), 197–210.
  • Ramanna, K., & Sletten, E. (2014). Network effects in countries’ adoption of IFRS. Accounting Review, 89(4), 1517–1543.
  • Rérolle, J.-F. (2008). The fair value debate: From accounting utopia to financial realism. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Financier, 2008(4), 1–12.
  • Singleton-Green, B. (2015). Public policy and accounting research: What is to be done? Accounting in Europe. Advance online publication, 12(2), 171–186
  • Standish, P. (2003). Evaluating national capacity for direct participation in international accounting harmonization: France as a test case. Abacus, 39(2), 186–210.
  • Tarca, A., Morris, R. D., & Moy, M. (2013). An investigation of the relationship between use of international accounting standards and source of company finance in Germany. Abacus, 49(1), 74–98.
  • Van Hulle, K. (1997). The true and fair view override in the accounting Directives. European Accounting Review, 6(4), 711–720.
  • Whittington, G. (2005). The adoption of international accounting standards in the European Union. European Accounting Review, 14(1), 127–153.
  • Zeff, S. A. (2007). The primacy of “present fairly” in the auditor's report, Accounting Perspectives, 6(1), 1–20.
  • Zeff, S. A. (2012). Political lobbying on accounting standards – US, UK and international experience. In C. W. Nobes & R. H. Parker (Eds.), Comparative international accounting (pp. 233–263). Harlow: Pearson.
  • Zeff, S. A., & Nobes, C. W. (2010). Has Australia (or any other jurisdiction) “adopted” IFRS? Australian Accounting Review, 20(2), 178–184.
  • Zeff, S. A., van der Wel, F., & Camfferman, K. (1992). Company financial reporting: A historical and comparative study of the Dutch regulatory process. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.