Lobbying and Audit Regulation in the EU

References

• Ang, N., Gallery, N., & Sidhu, B. K. (2000). The incentives of Australian public companies lobbying against proposed superannuation accounting standards. Abacus, 36(1), 40–70. doi: 10.1111/1467-6281.00053
   Google Scholar
• Böcking, H.-J., Gros, M., Wallek, C., & Worret, D. (2011). Analysis of the EU consultation on the Green paper “audit policy: Lessons from the crisis”. In R. von Rosen (Ed.), Studien des deutschen Aktieninstituts (Report No. 51, pp. 1–90). Frankfurt am Main: Deutsches Aktieninstitut.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. R. (1981). A descriptive analysis of select input bases of the financial accounting standards board. Journal of Accounting Research, 19(1), 232–246. doi: 10.2307/2490971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, D. Y. (1999). The informational effect of corporate lobbying against proposed accounting standards. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 12(3), 243–269. doi: 10.1023/A:1008374831913
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., Fortin, A., & Côté, L. (2007). Users’ participation in the accounting standard setting process: A theory-building study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1-2), 29–59. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2010). Green paper – “Audit policy: Lessons from the crisis”, COM (2010) 561 final, 13.10.2010. Retrieved from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0561&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2011). Summary of responses: Green paper audit policy: Lessons from the Crisis. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/finance/consultations/2010/green-paper-audit/docs/summary_responses_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ewelt-Knauer, C., Gold, A., & Pott, C. (2013). Mandatory audit firm rotation: A review of stakeholder perspectives and prior research. Accounting in Europe, 10(1), 27–41. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2013.772717
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G. (2004). Corporate lobbying on accounting standards: Methods, timing and perceived effectiveness. Abacus, 40(2), 219–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2004.00152.x
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G. (2010). The IASB standard setting process: Participation and perceptions of financial statement users. The British Accounting Review, 42(2), 103–118. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2010.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Giner, B., & Arce, M. (2012). Lobbying on accounting standards: Evidence from IFRS 2 on share-based payments. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 655–691. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.701796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. B. (2011). Lobbying of the IASB: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Accounting Research, 10(2), 57–75. doi: 10.2308/jiar-10078
   Google Scholar
• Harding, N., & McKinnon, J. (1997). User involvement in the standard setting process: A research note on the congruence of accountant and user perceptions of decision usefulness. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(1), 55–67. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00003-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S., & Zülch, H. (2014). Lobbying on accounting standard setting in the parliamentary environment of Germany. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(8), 709–723. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holthoff, G., Hoos, F., & Weissenberger, B. E. (2015). Are We lost in translation? The impact of using translated IFRS on decision-making. Accounting in Europe, 12(1), 107–125. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2015.1052824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R., & Van der Tas, L. (2012). Formal participation in the IASB’s Due process of standard setting: A multi-issue / multi-period analysis. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 693–729. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2010.522775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jupe, R. E. (2000). Self-Referential lobbying of the accounting standards board: The case of financial reporting standard No. 1. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 11(3), 337–359. doi: 10.1006/cpac.1999.0366
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, A. G., Marten, K.-U., Meuwissen, R., & Quick, R. (2013). Editorial – Research on audit quality. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 73(4), 241–253.
   Google Scholar
• Königsgruber, R. (2010). A political economy of accounting standard setting. Journal of Management and Governance, 14(4), 277–295. doi: 10.1007/s10997-009-9101-1
   Google Scholar
• Kosi, U., & Reither, A. (2014). Determinants of corporate participation in the IFRS 4 (insurance contracts) replacement process. Accounting in Europe, 11(1), 89–112. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2014.897459
   Google Scholar
• Kwok, W. C., & Sharp, D. (2005). Power and international accounting standard setting: Evidence from segment reporting and intangible assets projects. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(1), 74–99. doi: 10.1108/09513570510584665
   Google Scholar
• Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1991). The politics of government decision-making: A theory of regulatory capture. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1089–1127. doi: 10.2307/2937958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1993). A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K. (1997). Corporate lobbying of the international accounting standards committee. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 8(3), 175–203. doi: 10.1111/1467-646X.00024
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K. (2007). Constituent participation and the IASB’s international financial reporting interpretations committee. Accounting in Europe, 4(2), 207–254. doi: 10.1080/17449480701727981
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K., & Herz, P. J. (2013). A multi-issue/multi-period analysis of the geographic diversity of IASB comment letter participation. Accounting in Europe, 10(1), 99–151. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2013.772716
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, F. W. (1987). Accounting standards and Olson’s theory of collective action. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 6(1), 59–72. doi: 10.1016/0278-4254(87)90005-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, J. B. (1988). Some implications of auditors and client lobbying activities: A comparative analysis. Accounting and Business Research, 19(73), 56–64. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1988.9728836
   Google Scholar
• Mazza, I. (2001). On the role of lobbies in policy making. In M. Marrelli & G. Pignataro (Eds.), Public decision-making and asymmetry of information (pp. 37–66). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, A. J., Williams, P. F., & Frazier, K. B. (1991). A case study of accounting firm lobbying: Advice or consent. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2(3), 273–294. doi: 10.1016/1045-2354(91)90014-5
   Google Scholar
• McLeay, S., Ordelheide, D., & Young, S. (2000). Constituent lobbying and its impact on the development of financial reporting regulations: Evidence from Germany. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(1), 79–98. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00028-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndubizu, G. A., Choi, Y. C., & Jain, R. (1993). Corporate lobbying strategy and pension accounting deliberations: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 8(3), 277–287.
   Google Scholar
• Orens, R., Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., & van der Tas, L. (2011). Corporate lobbying in private accounting standard setting: Does the IASB have to reckon with national differences? Accounting in Europe, 8(2), 211–234. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2011.621672
   Google Scholar
• Puro, M. (1984). Audit firm lobbying before the financial accounting standards board: An empirical study. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(2), 624–646. doi: 10.2307/2490668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, A. R., Ng, L. W., & Tower, G. D. (1994). Policy choice and standard setting in New Zealand: An exploratory study. Abacus, 30(1), 98–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.1994.tb00345.x
   Google Scholar
• Ratzinger-Sakel, N., Audousset-Coulier, S., Kettunen, J., & Lesage, C. (2013). Joint audit: Issues and challenges for researchers and policy-makers. Accounting in Europe, 10(2), 175–199. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2013.834725
   Google Scholar
• Ratzinger-Sakel, N., & Schönberger, M. (2015). Restricting non-audit services in Europe – The potential (lack of) impact of a blacklist and a fee cap on auditor independence and audit quality. Accounting in Europe, 12(1), 61–86. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2015.1035290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, T. G. (1984). Lobbying of accounting standard setting bodies in the U.K. and the U.S.A.: A downsian analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(1), 81–95. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(84)90031-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandy, P. R., & Wilburn, N. L. (1992). Constituent participation in standard setting: The FASB’s first 100 statements. Accounting Horizons, 6(2), 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Tandy, P. R., & Wilburn, N. L. (1996). The academic community’s participation in standard setting: Submission of comment letters on SFAS Nos. 1-117. Accounting Horizons, 10(3), 92–111.
   Google Scholar
• Tutticci, I., Dunstan, K., & Holmes, S. (1994). Respondent lobbying in The Australian accounting standard setting process: ED49: A case study. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 7(2), 86–104. doi: 10.1108/09513579410058201
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weetman, P. (2001). Controlling the standard setting agenda: The role of FRS 3. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14(1), 85–108. doi: 10.1108/09513570110381088
   Google Scholar
• Weetman, P., Davie, E. S., & Collins, W. (1996). Lobbying on accounting issues: Preparer/user imbalance in the case of the operating and financial review. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(1), 59–76. doi: 10.1108/09513579610109978
   Google Scholar