International Accounting Standard Setting and Geopolitics

References

• Accountancy Europe. (2019). Interconnected standard setting for corporate reporting.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. (1998). Geopolitics: Re-visioning world politics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Albu, N., Albu, C. N., & Filip, A. (2017). Corporate reporting in Central and Eastern Europe: Issues, challenges and research opportunities. Accounting in Europe, 14(3), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2017.1385819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, D. (2006). Legal certainty, European-ness and realpolitik. Accounting in Europe, 3(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180600920194
   Google Scholar
• Alvaro, J. J. (2013). Political discourse in China's English language press. World Englishes, 32(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, M., & Li, F. (2015). What consensus? Geopolitics and policy paradigms in China and the United States. International Affairs, 91(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, H. (1978). Flaws in the UN’s disclosure proposals. Financial Times, March 22.
   Google Scholar
• Bergesen, A. J., & Suter, C. (2018). The return of geopolitics in the early 21st century: The globalization/geopolitics cycles. In A. J. Bergesen & S. Suter (Eds.), The return of geopolitics (pp. 1–8). World Society Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Botzem, S. (2012). The politics of accounting regulation: Organizing transnational standard setting in financial reporting. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, W. A. (2016). China’s “Asia Dream” The Belt Road Initiative and the new regional order. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 1(3), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891116647806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. A. (2007). Financial reporting and global capital markets: A history of the International Accounting Standards Committee, 1973-2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. A. (2015). Aiming for global accounting standards: The International Accounting Standards Board, 2001–2011. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, C. (2007). The role of government in markets: Keynote address and Robert R. Glauber Lecture at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, October 24. https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2007/spch102407cc.htm
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, K. (2007). Geopolitics: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elson, R. (2019). The United States in the world economy: Making sense of globalization. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1999). International accounting standard setting: A vision for the future.
   Google Scholar
• Gäumann, M., & Dobler, M. (2019). Formal participation in the EFRAG’s consultation processes: The role of European national standard-setters. Accounting in Europe, 16(1), 44–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2018.1514124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giner, B., & Mora, A. (2019). Political interference in financial reporting in the financial industry: Evidence from Spain. Available at SSRN 3138620.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. (2016). Understanding China’s Belt & Road initiative: Motivation, framework and assessment. China Economic Review, 40, 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, A., & Ma, R. (2001). Accounting in China in transition: 1949–2000. World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R., & Van der Tas, L. (2013). A geographic analysis of constituents’ formal participation in the process of international accounting standard setting: Do we have a level playing field? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(4), 237–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshua, J. (2019). Economic policies, paradigm shifts and their implications. In The Belt and Road Initiative and the global economy (pp. 13–46). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S. (2010). The myth of the Beijing Consensus. Journal of Contemporary China, 19(65), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670561003666087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblond, P. (2011). EU, US and international accounting standards: A delicate balancing act in governing global finance. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(3), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.551083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (2010). Zhongguo qiye kuaijizhunze gaige yu fazhan [ Chinese business accounting standards: Reform and development]. Renmin Chubanshe.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, W. R. (2014). The return of geopolitics: The revenge of the revisionist powers. Foreign Affairs, 93(3), 69–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, R. H., & Brown, A. L. (1969). Soviet economic developments and accounting. In K. Berg, G. H. Mueller, & L. M. Walker (Eds.), Readings in international accounting (pp. 113–123). Houghton Mifflin Co.
   Google Scholar
• Poullaos, C., & Sian, S. (Eds.). (2010). Accountancy and empire: The British legacy of professional organization. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ram, R. (2012). Development of the international financial reporting standard for small and medium-sized entities (Doctoral dissertation). University of Sydney. https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/8208
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. J. (1987). Accounting as a legitimating institution. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(4), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90023-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolland, N. (2017). China's “Belt and Road Initiative”: Underwhelming or game-changer? The Washington Quarterly, 40(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2017.1302743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarikas, R. H., Hien, V. D., & Djatej, A. M. (2009). International influence on accountancy in Vietnam. In R.W. McGee (Ed.), Corporate governance in developing economies (pp. 181–190). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• SEC. (2012). Work plan for the consideration of incorporating International Financial Reporting Standards into the financial reporting system for U.S. issuers: Final staff report. Washington: US Securities and Exchange Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Soederberg, S. (2001). The emperor's new suit: The new international financial architecture as a reinvention of the Washington Consensus. Global Governance, 7(4), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00704009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolov, V. (2016). Russia: Can IFRS be considered accounting? In D. Bensadon & N. Praquin (Eds.), IFRS in a global world (pp. 187–200). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tsygankov, A. P. (2012a). Russia and the West from Alexander to Putin: Honor in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsygankov, A. P. (2012b). Assessing cultural and regime-based explanations of Russia’s foreign policy: ‘Authoritarian at heart and expansionist by habit’? Europe-Asia Studies, 64(4), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2012.671568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuathail, G. Ó. (1998). Thinking critically about geopolitics. In G. Ó. Tuathail, S. Dalby, & P. Routledge (Eds.), The geopolitics reader (pp. 1–9). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. (2009). Promoting transparency in corporate reporting: A quarter century of ISAR. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Véron, N. (2007). The global accounting experiment. Bruegel.
   Google Scholar
• Véron, N. (2013). A double-entry Minervian case: The battle over international accounting standards. In Y. Tiberghien (Ed.), Leadership in global institution building (pp. 89–108). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, P. (2004). IAS 39: Where different accounting models collide. Accounting in Europe, 1(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000262711
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. (2009). A short history of the Washington Consensus. Law and Business Review of the Americas, 15(1), 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Zeff, S. A., & Johansson, S. E. (1984). The curious accounting treatment of the Swedish government loan to Uddeholm. Accounting Review, 59(2), 342–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar