References
- Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools in rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9412190214
- Allini, A., Aria, M., Macchioni, R., & Zagaria, C. (2018). Motivations behind users’ participation in the standard-setting process: Focus on financial analysts. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 37(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.04.002
- American Accounting Association’s Financial Accounting Standards Committee (AAA). (1999). Response to IASC discussion paper: Shaping IASC for the future. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.443
- Andiola, L., Bedard, J. C., & Hux, C. T. (2016). Writing a literature review in behavioral accounting research. In T. Libby & L. Thorne (Eds.), The Routledge companion to behavioral research in accounting (pp. 473–485). Routledge.
- Archibald, M. E. (2004). Between isomorphism and market partitioning: How organizational competencies and resources foster cultural and sociopolitical legitimacy, and promote organizational survival. In C. Johnson (Ed.), Legitimacy process in organizations – research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 22, pp. 171–211). Emerald Group Publishing.
- Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B.W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2635061
- Bamber, M., & McMeeking, K. (2016). An examination of international accounting standard-setting due process and the implications for legitimacy. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2015.03.003
- Baylin, G., MacDonald, L., & Richardson, A. J. (1996). Accounting standard-setting in Canada, 1864–1992: A theoretical analysis of structural evolution. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 5(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-9518(96)90018-X
- Bengtsson, E. (2011). Repoliticalization of accounting standard setting – The IASB, the EU and the global financial crisis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(6), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2011.04.001
- Best, J. (2007). Legitimacy dilemmas: The IMF’s pursuit of country ownership. Third World Quarterly, 28(3), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701192231
- Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0382
- Black, J. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes (LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, 2/2008).
- Black, J. (2009). Legitimacy and the competition for regulatory share (LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, 14/2009).
- Black, J., & Rouch, D. (2008). The development of the global markets as rule-makers: Engagement and legitimacy. Law and Financial Markets Review, 2(3), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2008.11427963
- Botzem, S. (2012). The politics of accounting regulation: Organizing transnational standard setting in financial reporting. Edward Elgar.
- Botzem, S. (2014). Transnational standard setting in accounting: Organizing expertise-based self-regulation in times of crisis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(6), 933–955. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1301
- Botzem, S., & Dobusch, L. (2012). Standardization cycles: A process perspective on the formation and diffusion of transnational standards. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 737–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443626
- Botzem, S., & Quack, S. (2009). (No) limits to Anglo-American accounting? Reconstructing the history of the International Accounting Standards Committee: A review article. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 988–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.07.001
- Bromwich, M., & Hopwood, A. G. (1983). Some issues in accounting standard setting: An introductory essay. In M. Bromwich & A. G. Hopwood (Eds.), Accounting standard setting: An international perspective (pp. v–xxiv). Pitman.
- Burlaud, A., & Colasse, B. (2011). International accounting standardisation: Is politics back? Accounting in Europe, 8(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2011.574412
- Büthe, T., & Mattli, W. (2011). The new global rulers: The privatization of regulation in the world economy. Princeton University Press.
- Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. A. (2007). Financial reporting and global capital markets: A history of the International Accounting Standards Committee 1973–2000. Oxford University Press.
- Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. A. (2015). Aiming for global accounting standards: The International Accounting Standards Board 2001–2011. Oxford University Press.
- Christiansen, T. (1998). Legitimacy dilemmas of supranational governance: The European Commission between accountability and independence. In M. Nentwich & A. Weale (Eds.), Political theory and the European Union: Legitimacy, constitutional choice and citizenship (pp. 97–110). Routledge.
- Chua, W. (1986). Radical development in accounting thought. The Accounting Review, 61, 601–632. https://jstor.org/stable/247360
- Danjou, P., & Walton, P. (2012). The legitimacy of the IASB. Accounting in Europe, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2012.664396
- Deegan, C. (2014). Financial accounting theory (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
- Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J., Tost, L. P., & Suchman, M. (2017). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 27–54). SAGE.
- Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). SAGE.
- De Luca, F., & Prather-Kinsey, J. (2018). Legitimacy theory may explain the failure of global adoption of IFRS: The case of Europe and the U.S. Journal of Management and Governance, 22(3), 501–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9409-9
- De Villiers, C., Dumay, J., & Maroun, W. (2019). Qualitative accounting research: Dispelling myths and developing a new research agenda. Accounting & Finance, 59(3), 1459–1487. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12487
- Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behaviour. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226
- Durocher, S., & Fortin, A. (2010). Standard-setting institutions’ user-oriented legitimacy management strategies. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7(4), 476–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091011094545
- Durocher, S., Fortin, A., Allini, A., & Zagaria, C. (2019). Users’ legitimacy perceptions about standard-setting process. Accounting and Business Research, 49(2), 206–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1526664
- Durocher, S., Fortin, A., & Côté, L. (2007). Users’ participation in the accounting standard-setting process: A theory-building study. Accounting Organizations and Society, 32(1–2), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.004
- Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB). (1999). International accounting standard setting: A vision for the future. FASB.
- Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB). (2011). Rules of procedure: Amended and restated through February 28, 2011. FASB.
- Fleckner, A. M. (2008). FASB and IASB: Dependence despite independence. Virginia Law & Business Review, 3(2), 275–309.
- Fogarty, T. J. (1992). Financial accounting standard setting as an institutionalized action field: Constraints, opportunities and dilemmas. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 11(4), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(92)90003-G
- Georgiou, O., & Jack, L. (2011). In pursuit of legitimacy: A history behind fair value accounting. The British Accounting Review, 43(4), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2011.08.001
- Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R. E. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd). London: SAGE.
- Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (Eds.). (2008). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE.
- Hines, R. D. (1991). The FASB's conceptual framework, financial accounting and the maintenance of the social world. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 16(4), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682
- Hopwood, A. G. (1987). The archaeology of accounting systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 207–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90038-9
- Hux, C. T. (2017). Use of specialists on audit engagement: A research synthesis and directions for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 39, 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2017.07.001
- Johnson, S. B., & Solomons, D. (1984). Institutional legitimacy and the FASB. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 3(3), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(84)90015-2
- Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R., & van der Tas, L. (2012). Formal participation in the IASB’s due process of standard setting: A multi-issue/multi-period analysis. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 693–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2010.522775
- Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R., & van der Tas, L. (2013). A geographic analysis of constituents’ formal participation in the process of international accounting standard setting: Do we have a level playing field? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(4), 237–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.04.005
- Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R., & van der Tas, L. (2014). Constituents’ participation in the IASC/IASB’s due process of international accounting standard setting: A longitudinal analysis. In R. Di Pietra, S. McLeay, & J. Ronen (Eds.), Accounting and regulation (pp. 79–110). Springer.
- Kusano, M., & Sanada, M. (2019). Crisis and organizational change: IASB’s response to the financial crisis. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 15(2), 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-02-2018-0019
- Larson, R. K. (2002). The IASC’s search for legitimacy: An analysis of the IASC’s Standing Interpretation Committee. Advances in International Accounting, 15, 79–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-3660(02)15020-3
- Larson, R. K. (2007). Constituent participation and the IASB’s International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee. Accounting in Europe, 4(2), 207–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480701727981
- Larson, R. K., & Herz, P. J. (2013). A multi-issue/multi-period analysis of the geographic diversity of IASB comment letter participation. Accounting in Europe, 10(1), 99–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2013.772716
- Larson, R. K., & Kenny, S. Y. (2011). The financing of the IASB: An analysis of donor diversity. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 20(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2010.12.003
- Lee, T. A. (2009). Financial accounting theory. In J. R. Edwards & S. P. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge companion to accounting history (pp. 139–161). Routledge.
- Le Manh, A. (2012). Une analyse du due process dans le cadre de la normalisation comptable: le cas du projet de comprehensive income par l’IASB [ An analysis of due process in the accounting standard-setting process context: The case of the IASB’s comprehensive income project]. Comptabilité – Contrôle – Audit, 18(1), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.181.0093
- Loft, A., Humphrey, C., & Turley, S. (2006). In pursuit of global regulation: Changing governance and accountability structures at the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(3), 428–451. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610670361
- Martinez-Diaz, L. (2005). Strategic experts and improvising regulators: Explaining the IASC’s rise to global influence. Business and Politics, 7(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1135
- Mattli, W., & Büthe, T. (2005). Global private governance: Lessons from a national model of setting standards in accounting. Law and Contemporary Problems, 68, 225–262. https://www.jstor.org/stabel/27592112.
- Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://www.jstor.org/stable/258610
- Orens, R., Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., & Van der Tas, L. (2011). Corporate lobbying in private accounting standard setting: Does the IASB have to reckon with national differences? Accounting in Europe, 8(2), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2011.621672
- Pelger, C., & Spieß, N. (2017). On the IASB’s construction of legitimacy – the case of the agenda consultation project. Accounting and Business Research, 47(1), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1198684
- Perry, J., & Nölke, A. (2005). International accounting standard setting: A network approach. Business and Politics, 7(3), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1136
- Perry, J., & Nölke, A. (2006). The political economy of international accounting standards. Review of International Political Economy, 13(4), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290600839790
- Powll, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Richardson, A. J. (1987). Accounting as a legitimating institution. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(4), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90023-7
- Richardson, A. J. (2009). Regulatory networks for accounting and auditing standards: A social network analysis of Canadian and international standard-setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(5), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.11.005
- Richardson, A. J. (2011). Regulatory competition in accounting: A history of the accounting standards authority of Canada. Accounting History Review, 21(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/21552851.2011.548570
- Richardson, A. J., & Eberlein, B. (2011). Legitimating transnational standard-setting: The case of the International Accounting Standards Board. Journal of Business and Ethics, 98(2), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0543-9
- Sanada, M. (2018). The legal backing for accounting standard-setting in Japan: A historical review. Accounting History, 23(3), 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373217743022
- Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic? Oxford University Press.
- Scharpf, F. W. (2006). Problem solving effectiveness and democratic accountability in the EU. Political Science Series 107. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.
- Schmidt, M. (2002). On the legitimacy of accounting standard setting by privately organized institutions in Germany and Europe. Schmalenbach Business Review, 54(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396651
- Scott, R. W. (2014). Institutions and organizations (4th ed.) (originally published in 1995). SAGE.
- Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2000, March 7). SEC concept release: International accounting standards. Release Nos. 33-7801, 34-42430; International Series No. 1215, File No. S7-04-00.
- Shapiro, B. P. (1997). Objectivity, relativism, and truth in external financial reporting: What’s really at stake in the dispute? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00017-7
- Shapiro, B. P. (1997). Objectivity, relativism, and truth in external financial reporting: What's really at stake in the dispute? Accounting. Organizations and Society, 22(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/50361-3682
- Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
- Sunder, S. (2002). Regulatory competition among accounting standards within and across international boundaries. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(02)00050-9
- Sunder, S. (2011). IFRS monopoly: The pied piper of financial reporting. Accounting and Business Research, 41(3), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2011.569055
- Tamm Hallström, K. (2004). Organizing international standardization – ISO and the IASC in quest of authority. Edward Elgar.
- Tamm Hallström, K., & Boström, M. (2010). Transnational multi-stakeholder standardization: Organizing fragile non-state authority. Edward Elgar.
- Tarca, A. (2018, October 29). The IASB: Reputation, legitimacy and happy families. Speech at RJ Chambers Memorial Lecture, Sydney. https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/2018/10/the-iasb-reputation-legitimacy-and-happy-families/
- Tokuga, Y. (2000). International accounting. Chuokeizaisha. (in Japanese).
- Wallace, R. S. O. (1990). Survival strategies of a global organization: The case of the International Accounting Standards Committee. Accounting Horizons, 4(2), 1–22.
- Wingard, C., Bosman, J., & Amisi, B. (2016). The legitimacy of IFRS. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(1), 134–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2014-0032
- Young, J. J. (2006). Making up users. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 579–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.12.005
- Zeff, S. A. (2005, January). The evolution of U.S. GAAP: The political forces behind professional standards. The CPA Journal.
- Zimmerman, J., & Werner, J. (2013). Regulating capitalism? The evolution of transnational accounting governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Zimmermann, J., Werner, J., & Volmer, P. B. (2008). Global governance in accounting rebalancing public power and private commitment. Palgrave Macmillan.