Board of Directors and Corporate Social Reporting: A Systematic Literature Network Analysis

References

• Aerts, W., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2006). Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: An international perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(3), 299–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Afeltra, G., Alerasoul, S. A., & Strozzi, F. (2021). The evolution of sustainable innovation: From the past to the future. European Journal of Innovation Management. Ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2021-0113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alerasoul, S. A., Afeltra, G., Hakala, H., Minelli, E., & Strozzi, F. (2021). Organisational learning, learning organisation, and learning orientation: An integrative review and framework. Human Resource Management Review. 100854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100854
   Google Scholar
• Alonso-Almeida, M., Llach, J., & Marimon, F. (2014). A closer look at the ‘Global Reporting initiative’ sustainability reporting as a tool to implement environmental and social policies: A worldwide sector analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 21(6), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorelli, M.-F., & García-Sánchez, I.-M. (2020). Critical mass of female directors, human capital, and stakeholder engagement by corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A., & Squazzoni, F. (2017). The emergence of a field: A network analysis of research on peer review. Scientometrics, 113(1), 503–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-amar, W., Chang, M., & Mcilkenny, P. (2017). Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure project. Journal of Business Ethics: JBE; Dordrecht, 142(2), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benston, G. J. (1982). Accounting and corporate accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(82)90014-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7–8), 1168–1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00598.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2008). Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.506
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, S., Clubb, C., & Hopwood, A. G. (1985). Accounting in its social context: Towards a history of value added in the United Kingdom. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(4), 381–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(85)90002-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, V. L., & Feroz, E. H. (2001). Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: An analysis of four US state governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7), 565–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00038-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerbioni, F., & Parbonetti, A. (2007). Exploring the effects of corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure: An analysis of European biotechnology companies. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 791–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701707011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. C. M., & Courtenay, S. M. (2006). Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 262–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2006.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., & Strozzi, F. (2018). Citation network analysis for supporting continuous improvement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 43(9), 1637–1653. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1276550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colicchia, C., & Strozzi, F. (2012). Supply chain risk management: A new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211246558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormier, D., Gordon, I. M., & Magnan, M. (2004). Corporate environmental disclosure: Contrasting management’s Perceptions with reality. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(2), 143–165. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000015844.86206.b9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucari, N., Esposito De Falco, S., & Orlando, B. (2018). Diversity of Board of Directors and Environmental Social Governance: Evidence from Italian Listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 25(3), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, C., Cooper, B. J., & Shelly, M. (2006). An investigation of TBL report assurance statements: UK and European evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(4), 329–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610661388
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, 37(6), 817–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00051-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy: social values and Organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226
   Google Scholar
• Dumay, J., & Cai, L. (2015). Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure. Journal of Intellectual Capital; Bradford, 16(1), 121–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-04-2014-0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on Organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., Elamer, A. A., & Zhang, Q. (2019). A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business Strategy & the Environment (John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 28(1), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring Organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and Impression Management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 699–738. https://doi.org/10.5465/256313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frías-Aceituno, J. V., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2013b). Is integrated reporting determined by a country’s legal system? An exploratory study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 44, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sánchez, I. M. (2014). Explanatory factors of integrated sustainability and financial reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2013a). The role of the Board in the Dissemination of Integrated Corporate Social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Sánchez, I.-M., Aibar-Guzmán, B., Aibar-Guzmán, C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2020). “Sell” recommendations by analysts in response to business communication strategies concerning the Sustainable Development Goals and the SDG compass. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Sánchez, I.-M., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & Garcia-Benau, M.-A. (2019). Integrated reporting: The mediating role of the board of directors and investor protection on managerial discretion in munificent environments. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbins, M., Richardson, A., & Waterhouse, J. (1990). The Management of corporate financial disclosure: Opportunism, ritualism, policies, and processes. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(1), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579510086812
   Google Scholar
• Gul, F. A., & Leung, S. (2004). Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(5), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19(76), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1989.9728863
   Google Scholar
• Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Helfaya, A, & Moussa, T. (2017). Do board’s corporate social responsibility strategy and orientation influence environmental sustainability disclosure? UK evidence. Business Strategy & the Environment (John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 26(8), 1061–1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S. M., & Wong, K. S. (2001). A study of corporate disclosure practice and effectiveness in Hong Kong. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 12(1), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-646x.00067
   Google Scholar
• Hummon, N. P., & Dereian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(89)90017-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2017). The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1799589). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1799589
   Google Scholar
• Kajikawa, Y., Ohno, J., Takeda, Y., Matsushima, K., & Komiyama, H. (2007). Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: An analysis of the citation network. Sustainability Science, 2(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-007-0027-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 207–223. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1336-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Colicchia, C., & Menachof, D. (2018). Ethical sourcing: An analysis of the literature and implications for future research. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(4), 1033–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, J. (2003). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 7(4), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024940629314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social Network analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985864
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.511
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A. (2014). Where is the evidence: Realising the value of grey literature for policy and practice. Discussion Paper, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., Pike, R., & Haniffa, R. (2008). Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms. Accounting and Business Research, 38(2), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2008.9663326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, L., Lin, T. P., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Corporate Board and corporate social Responsibility assurance: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics: JBE; Dordrecht, 150(1), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3176-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, R. J. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucio-Arias, D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCiteTM-based historiograms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1948–1962. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangos, N. C., & Lewis, N. R. (1995). A socio-economic paradigm for analysing managers′ accounting choice behaviour. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(1), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579510079117
   Google Scholar
• Marimon, F., del Mar Alonso-Almeida, M., del Pilar Rodríguez, M., & Alejandro, K. A. C. (2012). The worldwide diffusion of the global reporting initiative: What is the point? Journal of Cleaner Production, 33, 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(3), 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3
   Google Scholar
• Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00008-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntim, C. G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Black economic empowerment disclosures by South African listed corporations: The influence of ownership and Board characteristics. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 121–138. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1446-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortas, E., Álvarez, I., & Zubeltzu, E. (2017). Firms’ Board independence and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Sustainability, 9(6), 1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perego, P., & Kolk, A. (2012). Multinationals’ accountability on sustainability: The evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 173–190. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1420-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistoni, A., Songini, L., & Bavagnoli, F. (2018). Integrated reporting quality: An empirical analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M., & Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M. (2010). The role of the Board of directors in Disseminating Relevant Information on Greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 391–424. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0515-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid, A. A., Ibrahim, M. K., Othman, R., & See, K. F. (2012). IC disclosures in IPO prospectuses: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931211196213
   Google Scholar
• Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate Social Responsibility disclosure ratings by spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9968-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Dominguez, L., Gallego-Alvarez, I., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2009). Corporate governance and Codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 187–202. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0035-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, R., Zainuddin, Y. H., & Haron, H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal; Bingley, 5(2), 212–226. 10.1108/17471110910964496
   Google Scholar
• Samaha, K., Khlif, H., & Hussainey, K. (2015). The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 24, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Samaha, K., Khlif, H., & Hussainey, K. (2015). The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. Journal Of International Accounting, Auditing And Taxation, 24(C), 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Shamil, M., M, M., Shaikh, J., Ho, P.-L., & Krishnan, A. (2014). The influence of board characteristics on sustainability reporting: Empirical evidence from Sri Lankan firms. Asian Review of Accounting, 22(2), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-09-2013-0060
   Google Scholar
• Sierra-García, L., Zorio-Grima, A., & García-Benau, M. A. (2015). Stakeholder engagement, Corporate Social Responsibility and integrated reporting: An exploratory study. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 22(5), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & House, R. J. (1986). Organizational Legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strozzi, F., Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., & Noè, C. (2017). Literature review on the ‘Smart factory’ concept using bibliometric tools. International Journal of Production Research, 55(22), 6572–6591. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1326643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayles, M., Pike, R. H., & Sofian, S. (2007). Intellectual capital, management accounting practices and corporate performance: Perceptions of managers. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(4), 522–548. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710762575
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for Developing evidence-informed Management knowledge by means of Systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, S., Welford, R., & Brown, M. (2009). Reporting on community investment. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 16(3), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velte, P., & Stawinoga, M. (2017). Integrated reporting: The current state of empirical research, limitations and future research implications. Journal of Management Control, 28(3), 275–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-016-0235-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., & Rubino, M. (2020). Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: An agency theory perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 1152–1163. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015). Analysis and Visualization of citation networks. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 7(1), 1–207. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00624ED1V01Y201501ICR039
   Google Scholar
• Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar