405
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Auditors’ Carbon Risk Consideration under the EU Emission Trading System

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 14-43 | Received 17 Oct 2022, Accepted 30 Aug 2023, Published online: 20 Sep 2023

References

  • Allini, A., Giner, B., & Caldarelli, A. (2018). Opening the black box of accounting for greenhouse gas emissions: The different views of institutional bodies and firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172(4), 2195–2205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.194
  • Asante-Appiah, B. (2020). Does the severity of a client’s negative environmental, social and governance reputation affect audit effort and audit quality? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(3), 106713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.106713
  • Bartram, S. M., Hou, K., & Kim, S. (2021). Real effects of climate policy: Financial constraints and spillovers. Journal of Financial Economics, 143(2), 668–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.06.015
  • Barua, A., Hossain, M. S., & Rama, D. V. (2019). Financial versus operating liability leverage and audit fees. International Journal of Auditing, 23(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12157
  • Beattie, V., Goodacre, A., Pratt, K., & Stevenson, J. (2001). The determinants of audit fees—evidence from the voluntary sector. Accounting and Business Research, 31(4), 243–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2001.9729619
  • Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga-González, C. (2008). Carbon trading: Accounting and reporting issues. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 697–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802489162
  • Bell, T. B., Doogar, R., & Solomon, I. R. (2008). Audit labor usage and fees under business risk auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(4), 729–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00291.x
  • Bell, T. B., Landsman, W. R., & Shackelford, D. A. (2001). Auditors’ perceived business risk and audit fees: Analysis and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00002
  • Black, C. M. (2013). Accounting for carbon emission allowances in the European union: In search of consistency. Accounting in Europe, 10(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2013.834730
  • Bonner, S. E. (1994). A model of the effects of audit task complexity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(3), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90033-7
  • Brouwers, R., Schoubben, F., & van Hulle, C. (2018). The influence of carbon cost pass through on the link between carbon emission and corporate financial performance in the context of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1422–1436. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2193
  • Burke, J. J., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2019). Auditor response to negative media coverage of client environmental, social, and governance practices. Accounting Horizons, 33(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52450
  • Busch, T., Bassen, A., Lewandowski, S., & Sump, F. (2020). Corporate carbon and financial performance revisited. Organization & Environment, 35(1), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026620935638
  • Cadez, S., Czerny, A., & Letmathe, P. (2019). Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2070
  • Chapple, L., Clarkson, P. M., & Gold, D. L. (2013). The cost of carbon: Capital market effects of the proposed emission trading scheme (ETS). Abacus, 49(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12006
  • Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Pinnuck, M., & Richardson, G. D. (2015). The valuation relevance of greenhouse gas emissions under the European Union Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme. European Accounting Review, 24(3), 551–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.927782
  • Council Decision. (2002/358/EC). Council Decision of 25 April 2002 concerning the approval, on behalf of the European Community, of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the joint fulfilment of commitments thereunder.
  • Czerny, A., & Letmathe, P. (2017). Eco-efficiency: GHG reduction related environmental and economic performance. The case of the companies participating in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(6), 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1951
  • DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
  • Delmas, M. A., Nairn-Birch, N., & Lim, J. (2015). Dynamics of environmental and financial performance. Organization & Environment, 28(4), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615620238
  • De Martinis, M., & Houghton, K. (2019). The business risk audit approach and audit production efficiency. Abacus, 55(4), 734–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12178
  • Dinh, T., Husmann, A., & Melloni, G. (2021). The role of non-financial performance indicators and integrated reporting in achieving sustainable value creation. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2021/662943/IPOL_ATA(2021)662943_EN.pdf.
  • Directive 2003/87/EC. (2003). Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC.
  • Downar, B., Ernstberger, J., Reichelstein, S., Schwenen, S., & Zaklan, A. (2021). The impact of carbon disclosure mandates on emissions and financial operating performance. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1137–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09611-x
  • Du, Z., Xu, C., & Lin, B. (2022). Does the Emission Trading Scheme achieve the dual dividend of reducing pollution and improving energy efficiency? Micro evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 323, 116202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116202
  • Eierle, B., Hartlieb, S., Hay, D. C., Niemi, L., & Ojala, H. (2021). Importance of country factors for global differences in audit pricing: New empirical evidence. International Journal of Auditing, 25(2), 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12222
  • Eierle, B., Hartlieb, S., Hay, D. C., Niemi, L., & Ojala, H. (2022). External factors and the pricing of audit services: A systematic review of the archival literature using a PESTLE analysis. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 41(3), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-2019-510
  • Ellerman, A. D., Convery, F. J., de Perthuis, C., Alberola, E., Buchner, B. K., Delbosc, A., … Matthes, F. C. (2011). Pricing Carbon (Vol. 556). Cambridge University Press.
  • European Commission. (2016). The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). Retrieved from https://climate.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-12/factsheet_ets_en.pdf.
  • European Commission. (2020a). COM(2019) 557 final/2: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Report on the functioning of the European carbon market. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0557R(01)&from=EN.
  • European Commission. (2020b). COM(2020) 562 final: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Stepping up Europe's 2030 climate ambitions, Investing in a climate-neutral future for the benefit of our people. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0562&from=EN.
  • European Commission. (2020c). COM(2020) 740 final: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Report on the functioning of the European carbon market. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/document/download/2fdbed5e-a6a2-472c-b53f-380610430ba1_en.
  • European Commission. (2021). European Green Deal: Commission proposes transformation of EU economy and society to meet climate ambitions. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_3541.
  • European Commission. (n.d.a). Development of EU ETS (2005-2020). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/development-eu-ets-2005-2020_en.
  • European Commission. (n.d.b). EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets_en.
  • European Environment Agency. (2010). Tracking progress towards Kyoto and 2020 targets in Europe. EEA report: Vol. 2010,7. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publ. of the Europ. Union. Retrieved from http://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/13692d0f-08d8-43ef-934a-f7f9005946cf.
  • FRC. (2020). FRC Climate Thematic: Audit – How are auditors taking account of climate-related challenges? Retrieved from https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/0ef2c94a-9028-4efa-ac80-3b8c2e0d9a11/Audit-FINAL.pdf.
  • FSB. (2017). Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
  • Greenhouse Gas Protocol. (n.d.). Calculation Tools: Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved from https://ghgprotocol.org/calculationg-tools-faq.
  • Griffin, P. A., Lont, D. H., & Sun, E. Y. (2017). The relevance to investors of greenhouse Gas emission disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 1265–1297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12298
  • Hartlieb, S., & Eierle, B. (2022). Do auditors respond to clients’ climate change-related external risks? Evidence from audit fees. European Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2022.2141811 .
  • Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audtit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141–191. doi:10.1506/4XR4-KT5V-E8CN-91GX
  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2007). Environmental technical and administrative innovations in the Canadian manufacturing industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.475
  • Herbohn, K., Gao, R., & Clarkson, P. (2019). Evidence on whether banks consider carbon risk in their lending decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(1), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3711-3
  • Hoffmann, V. H., & Busch, T. (2008). Corporate carbon performance indicators. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(4), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00066.x
  • Hummel, K., & Szekely, M. (2022). Disclosure on the sustainable development goals – evidence from Europe. Accounting in Europe, 19(1), 152–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2021.1894347
  • IAASB. (2020). IAASB Issues Staff Audit Practice Alert on climate-related Risks. Retrieved from https://www.iaasb.org/news-events/2020-10/iaasb-issues-staff-audit-practice-alert-climate-related-risks.
  • Johnstone, K. M. (2000). Client-Acceptance decisions: Simultaneous effects of client business risk, audit risk, auditor business risk, and risk adaptation. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.1.1
  • Jung, J., Herbohn, K., & Clarkson, P. (2018). Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1151–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6
  • Karpoff, J. M., Lott, J. J. R., & Wehrly, E. W. (2005). The reputational penalties for environmental violations: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 653–675. https://doi.org/10.1086/430806
  • Kennedy, P. (1998). A guide to econometrics (4. ed.). Blackwell.
  • Knechel, W. R., Rouse, P., & Schelleman, C. (2009). A modified audit production framework: Evaluating the relative efficiency of audit engagements. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1607–1638. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1607
  • Kolk, A., & Levy, D. (2001). Winds of change. European Management Journal, 19(5), 501–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(01)00064-0
  • Kolk, A., Levy, D., & Pinkse, J. (2008). Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 719–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802489121
  • Kreß, A., Eierle, B., & Tsalavoutas, I. (2019). Development costs capitalization and debt financing. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46(5-6), 636–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12370
  • Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1067–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz137
  • Labatt, S., & White, R. R. (2007). Carbon finance: The financial implications of climate change. Wiley finance series. Wiley. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0741/2006033468-b.html.
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. https://doi.org/10.1086/250042
  • Li, Y., Simunic, D. A., & Ye, M. (2014). Corporate environmental risk exposure and audit fees. Working Paper. Retrieved from https://www.isarhq.org/2014_downloads/papers/ISAR2014_Li_Simunic_Ye.pdf.
  • Liesen, A., Hoepner, A. G., Patten, D. M., & Figge, F. (2015). Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(7), 1047–1074. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2013-1547
  • LópezPuertas-Lamy, M., Desender, K., & Epure, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and the assessment by auditors of the risk of material misstatement. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 4(1), 485. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12268
  • MacKenzie, D. (2009). Making things the same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3-4), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.004
  • Marlon, J. R., Wang, X., Bergquist, P., Howe, P. D., Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., … Rosenthal, S. (2022). Change in US state-level public opinion about climate change: 2008–2020. Environmental Research Letters, 17(12), 124046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca702
  • Matisoff, D. C. (2010). Making cap-and-trade work: Lessons from the European union experience. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 52(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139150903479530
  • Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014). Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 695–724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50629
  • Naranjo Tuesta, Y., Crespo Soler, C., & Ripoll Feliu, V. (2021). Carbon management accounting and financial performance: Evidence from the European Union emission trading system. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1270–1282. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2683
  • Nguyen, J. H., Truong, C., & Zhang, B. (2020). The price of carbon risk: Evidence from the Kyoto protocol ratification. SSRN Electronic Journal. Advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3669660
  • Niemi, L. (2002). Do firms pay for audit risk? Evidence on risk premiums in audit fees after direct control for audit effort. International Journal of Auditing, 6(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2002.tb00004.x
  • Niemi, L., Knechel, W. R., Ojala, H., & Collis, J. (2018). Responsiveness of auditors to the audit risk standards: Unique evidence from Big 4 audit firms. Accounting in Europe, 15(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2018.1431398
  • Oestreich, A. M., & Tsiakas, I. (2015). Carbon emissions and stock returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Journal of Banking & Finance, 58, 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.05.005
  • Palmrose, Z-V. (1991). Trials of legal disputes involving independent auditors: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(1), 149–185. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491008
  • Panfilo, S., & Krasodomska, J. (2022). Climate change risk disclosure in Europe: The role of cultural-cognitive, regulative, and normative factors. Accounting in Europe, 19(1), 226–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2022.2026000
  • Patnaik, S. (2020). Emissions permit allocation and strategic firm behavior: Evidence from the oil sector in the European Union emissions trading scheme. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 976–995. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2411
  • Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. (2007). Multinational corporations and emissions trading. European Management Journal, 25(6), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.07.003
  • Pratt, J., & Stice, J. D. (1994). The effects of client characteristics on auditor litigation risk judgments, required audit evidence, and recommended audit fees. The Accounting Review, 69(4), 639–656. http://www.jstor.org/stable/248435.
  • Rabarison, M., Siraj, I., & Wang, B. (2020). Environmental policy and audit pricing. SSRN Electronic Journal. Advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3542562
  • Sariannidis, N., Zafeiriou, E., Giannarakis, G., & Arabatzis, G. (2013). Co2 emissions and financial performance of socially responsible firms: An empirical survey. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1737
  • Schaltegger, S., & Csutora, M. (2012). Carbon accounting for sustainability and management. Status quo and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.024
  • Schiemann, F., & Sakhel, A. (2019). Carbon disclosure, contextual factors, and information asymmetry: The case of physical risk reporting. European Accounting Review, 28(4), 791–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1534600
  • Sharma, D. S., Sharma, V. D., & Litt, B. A. (2018). Environmental responsibility, external assurance, and firm valuation. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(4), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51940
  • Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190. doi:10.2307/2490397
  • Sprengel, D. C., & Busch, T. (2011). Stakeholder engagement and environmental strategy - the case of climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(6), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.684
  • Stanley, J. D. (2011). Is the audit fee disclosure a leading indicator of clients’ business risk? AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10049
  • Subramaniam, N., Wahyuni, D., Cooper, B. J., Leung, P., & Wines, G. (2015). Integration of carbon risks and opportunities in enterprise risk management systems: Evidence from Australian firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.013
  • Thompson, P. (1998). Bank lending and the environment: policies and opportunities. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 16(6), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652329810241384
  • Truong, C., Garg, M., & Adrian, C. (2020). Climate risk and the price of audit services: The case of drought. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 39(4), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-18-097
  • WBCSD, WRI (2004). The greenhouse gas protocol: A corporate accounting and reporting standard (Revised ed.). World Resources Inst.
  • Weber, O. (2012). Environmental credit risk management in banks and financial service institutions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(4), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.737
  • Weinhofer, G., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2008). Mitigating climate change - how do corporate strategies differ? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.618
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2020). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (Seventh edition). Cengage.
  • World Bank. (2022). Carbon pricing dashboard: Map and data. Retrieved from https://carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org/map_data.
  • Yao, S., Pan, L., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Does environmental disclosure have an auditing effect? Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-10-2018-2030
  • You, J., Wu, X., Luo, L., Shen, H., & Tan, X. (2021). New business as a bargaining factor in audit pricing: evidence from emission trading schemes. Accounting and Business Research, 51(6-7), 800–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2021.1874265
  • Zhang, Y-J, & Liu, J-Y. (2020). Overview of research on carbon information disclosure. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 7(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0089-1

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.