Effects of particle size reduction of meadow hay on feed intake, performance, and apparent total tract nutrient digestibility in dairy cows

References

• AFRC. 1993. Agricultural food research council. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants: an advisory manual prepared by the AFRC technical committee on responses to nutrients. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Allen M, Mertens D. 1988. Evaluating constraints on fiber digestion by rumen microbes. J Nutr. 118:261–270. doi: 10.1093/jn/118.2.261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen MS. 2000. Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 83:1598–1624. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75030-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ASAE] American National Standards Institute. 1995. Method of determining and expressing fineness of feed material by sieving. ASAE Standards 1995. MI, USA: ASAE, St. Joseph; p. 461.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchemin KA, Rode LM. 1997. Minimum versus optimum concentrations of fiber in dairy cow diets based on barley silage and concentrates of barley or corn. J Dairy Sci. 80:1629–1639. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76094-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Lopez E, Haselmann A, Petri RM, Knaus W, Zebeli Q. 2020. Evaluation of fecal fermentation profile and bacterial community in organically fed dairy cows consuming forage-rich diets with different particle sizes. J Dairy Sci. 103:8020–8033. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-18036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaver LD, Farver T, Webster G. 1989. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 72:68–78. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79081-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertl P, Klocker H, Hörtenhuber S, Knaus W, Zollitsch W. 2015. The net contribution of dairy production to human food supply: the case of Austrian dairy farms. Agric Syst. 137:119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertl P, Steinwidder A, Schönauer M, Krimberger K, Knaus W, Zollitsch W. 2016. Net food production of different livestock: A national analysis for Austria including relative occupation of different land categories / Netto-Lebensmittelproduktion der Nutztierhaltung: Eine nationale Analyse für Österreich inklusive relativer Flächenbeanspruchung. Die Bodenkultur. 67:91–103. doi: 10.1515/boku-2016-0009.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. Commission regulation (EC) no (848/2018).
   Google Scholar
• Fisher DS, Burns J, Pond KR. 1988. Estimation of mean and median particle size of ruminant digesta. J Dairy Sci. 71:518–524. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79583-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GfE. 2001. Empfehlungen zur Energie- und Nährstoffversorgung der Milchkühe und Aufzuchtrinder. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: DLG-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• GfE. 2008. New equations for predicting metabolisable energy of grass and maize products for ruminants (in German). Proc Nutr Soc. 17:191–198.
   Google Scholar
• Grüner B. 2022. Die Situation der österreichischen Land- und Forstwirtschaft. Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Regions and Water Management (BML). 63rd ed. Vienna, Austria: Republic of Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Haselmann A, Kirchler J, Fürst-Waltl B, Zollitsch W, Zebeli Q, Knaus W. 2021. The use of an impeller mowing conditioner during haymaking had no effects on feeding behavior, feed intake or performance of organic dairy cows. Renew Agric Food Syst. 36:549–556. doi: 10.1017/S1742170521000168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselmann A, Zehetgruber K, Fuerst-Waltl B, Zollitsch W, Knaus W, Zebeli Q. 2019. Feeding forages with reduced particle size in a total mixed ration improves feed intake, total tract digestibility, and performance of organic dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 102:8839–8849. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover WH. 1978. Digestion and absorption in the hindgut of ruminants. J Anim Sci. 46:1789–1799. doi: 10.2527/jas1978.4661789x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain E. 2021. Forage particle size: It’s implications on behavior performance, health and welfare of dairy cows. Online J Anim Feed Res. 11:71–81. doi: 10.51227/ojafr.2021.13.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson J, Spörndly R, Lindberg M, Holtenius K. 2018. Replacing human-edible feed ingredients with by-products increases net food production efficiency in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 101:7146–7155. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy P, Poppi D. 1984. Critical particle size in sheep and cattle. In Kennedy PM, editors. Techniques in particle size analysis of feed and digesta in ruminants. Edmonton, Canada: Canadian Society of Animal Science; p. 170.
   Google Scholar
• Kononoff PJ, Heinrichs AJ, Buckmaster DR. 2003. Modification of the Penn State forage and total mixed ration particle separator and the effects of moisture content on its measurements. J Dairy Sci. 86:1858–1863. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73773-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause KM, Combs DK. 2003. Effects of forage particle size, forage source, and grain fermentability on performance and ruminal pH in midlactation cows. J Dairy Sci. 86:1382–1397. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73722-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Khafipour E, Krause D, Kroeker A, Rodriguez-Lecompte J, Gozho G, Plaizier J. 2012. Effects of subacute ruminal acidosis challenges on fermentation and endotoxins in the rumen and hindgut of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 95:294–303. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martz F, Belyea R. 1986. Role of particle size and forage quality in digestion and passage by cattle and sheep. J Dairy Sci. 69:1996–2008. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80626-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens DR. 1997. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 80:1463–1481. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76075-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasrollahi SM, Imani M, Zebeli Q. 2015. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of forage particle size, level, source, and preservation method on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and performance in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 98:8926–8939. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppi D, Ellis W, Matis JH, Lascano CE. 2001. Marker concentration patterns of labelled leaf and stem particles in the rumen of cattle grazing Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) analysed by reference to a raft model. Br J Nutr. 85:553–563. doi: 10.1079/BJN2001317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qumar M, Khiaosa-Ard R, Pourazad P, Wetzels SU, Klevenhusen F, Kandler W, Aschenbach JR, Zebeli Q, Blachier F. 2016. Evidence of in vivo absorption of lactate and modulation of short chain fatty acid absorption from the reticulorumen of non-lactating cattle fed high concentrate diets. PLoS ONE. 11:e0164192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schils RL, Bufe C, Rhymer CM, Francksen RM, Klaus VH, Abdalla M, Milazzo F, Lellei-Kovács E, Berge HT, Bertora C. 2022. Permanent grasslands in Europe: land use change and intensification decrease their multifunctionality. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 330:107891. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.107891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder UJ, Staufenbiel R. 2006. Invited review: methods to determine body fat reserves in the dairy cow with special regard to ultrasonographic measurement of backfat thickness. J Dairy Sci. 89:1–14. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72064-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siciliano-Jones J, Murphy M. 1989. Production of volatile fatty acids in the rumen and cecum-colon of steers as affected by forage: concentrate and forage physical form. J Dairy Sci. 72:485–492. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79130-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiekers H, Pohl C, Staudacher W. 2011. Leitfaden zur Berechnung des Energiegehaltes bei Einzel- und Mischfuttermitteln für die Schweine-und Rinderfütterung. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Stellungnahme des DLG-Arbeitskreises Futter und Fütterung.
   Google Scholar
• Tafaj M, Junck B, Maulbetsch A, Steingass H, Piepho H, Drochner W. 2004. Digesta characteristics of dorsal, middle and ventral rumen of cows fed with different hay qualities and concentrate levels. Arch Anim Nutr. 58:325–342. doi: 10.1080/00039420412331273259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uden P. 1988. The effect of grinding and pelleting hay on digestibility, fermentation rate, digesta passage and rumen and faecal particle size in cows. Ani Feed Sci Tech. 19:145–157. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(88)90063-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Universität Hohenheim - Dokumentationsstelle, Ed. 1997. DLG-Futterwerttabellen für Wiederkäuer. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: DLG Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2nd ed. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VDLUFA. 2012. Handbuch der landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs- und Umweltmethodik (VDLUFA Methodenbuch): Band III. Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. Darmstadt, Germany: VDLUFA-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson JM. 2011. Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock. Animal. 5:1014–1022. doi: 10.1017/S175173111100005X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yansari AT, Valizadeh R, Naserian A, Christensen D, Yu P, Shahroodi FE. 2004. Effects of alfalfa particle size and specific gravity on chewing activity, digestibility, and performance of Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 87:3912–3924. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73530-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebeli Q, Aschenbach JR, Tafaj M, Boguhn J, Ametaj BN, Drochner W. 2012a. Invited review: role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in high-producing dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 95:1041–1056. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebeli Q, Klevenhusen F, Drochner W. 2012b. Characterisation of particle dynamics and turnover in the gastrointestinal tract of Holstein cows fed forage diets differing in fibre and protein contents. Arch Anim Nutr. 66:372–384. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2012.710083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebeli Q, Tafaj M, Metzler B, Steingass H, Drochner W. 2006. New aspects on the contribution of ruminal mat quality on digesta kinetics in reticulorumen of high-producing dairy cows (in German). Übersichten zur Tierernährung. 34:165–196.
   Google Scholar