Shakespeare and Morality

Bibliography

• Aers, David, and Sarah Beckwith, eds. ‘Imagining the Virtues: Medieval and Early Modern Histories’. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 52, no. 3 (2022).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle. Aristotle’s Poetics. Translated with a commentary by George Whalley. Edited by John Baxter and J. P. Atherton. Montreal: McGill-Queens’s University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Translated by Willard Trask. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, Jennifer Ann. Hegel and Shakespeare on Moral Imagination. Albany: State University of New York, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, Jennifer Ann, and Richard Wilson, eds. Shakespeare and Continental Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, David N. Virtue’s Own Feature: Shakespeare and the Virtue Ethics Tradition. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Benfell, V. Stanley. ‘Disowning Certainty: Tragic and Comic Skepticism in Cavell, Montaigne, and Shakespeare’. In Stanley Cavell on Aesthetic Understanding, edited by Garry L. Hagberg, 109–31. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bristol, Michael, ed. Shakespeare and Moral Agency. London: Continuum, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cavell, Stanley. Disowning Knowledge. In Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Cefalu, Paul. Moral Identity in Early Modern English Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, John D. Seeming Knowledge: Shakespeare and Skeptical Faith. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, Holly A. The Matter of Virtue: Women’s Ethical Action from Chaucer to Shakespeare. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Crosbie, Christopher. Revenge Tragedy and Classical Philosophy on the Early Modern Stage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, Brian. Mortal Thoughts: Religion, Secularity, and Identity in Shakespeare and Early Modern Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, Kevin, and James Kearney, eds. ‘Shakespeare and Phenomenology’. Criticism 54, no. 3 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Cutrofello, Andrew. All for Nothing: Hamlet’s Negativity. Boston: MIT Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, Christy. Reading Shakespeare’s Characters: Rhetoric, Ethics, and Identity. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Fernie, Ewan. Shakespeare for Freedom: Why the Plays Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Lowell, James Kearney, and Julia Reinhard Lupton, eds. Entertaining the Idea: Shakespeare, Performance, and Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, David B. Eating and Ethics in Shakespeare’s England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, Hugh. Shakespeare’s Dialectic of Hope: From the Political to the Utopian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Patrick. ‘Falstaff’s Party: Shakespeare, Montaigne, and their Liberal Censors’. In Shakespeare and Montaigne, edited by Lars Engle, Patrick Gray and William M. Hamlin, 326–73. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Patrick. ‘“HIDE THY SELFE”: Hamlet, Montaigne, and Epicurean Ethics’. In Shakespeare and Renaissance Ethics, edited by Patrick Gray and John D. Cox, 213–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Patrick. ‘Shakespeare and the Fall of the Roman Republic: A Reply to Paul A. Cantor’. Skenè. A Journal of Theatre and Drama Studies 6, no. 2 (2020): 189–203.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Patrick. Shakespeare and the Fall of the Roman Republic: Selfhood, Stoicism and Civil War. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Patrick. ‘Shakespeare vs. Seneca: Competing Visions of Human Dignity’. In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Senecan Tragedy: Scholarly, Theatrical, and Literary Receptions, edited by Eric Dodson-Robinson, 203–32. Leiden: Brill, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Patrick. ‘Shakespeare versus Aristotle: Anagnorisis, Repentance, and Acknowledgment’. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 49, no. 1 (2019): 85–111. https://doi.org/10.1215/10829636-7279648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, Patrick, and John D. Cox, eds. Shakespeare and Renaissance Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlin, Hannibal. The Bible in Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlin, Hannibal, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hershinow, David. Shakespeare and the Truth-Teller: Confronting the Cynic Ideal. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, David. ‘The Worst Case of Knowing the Other? Stanley Cavell and Troilus and Cressida’. Philosophy and Literature 32, no. 1 (2008): 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.0.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, Peter. Shakespeare’s Individualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as A Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Toria. ‘“To Feel What Wretches Feel”: Reformation and the Re-Naming of English Compassion’. In Compassion in Early Modern Literature and Culture, edited by Kristine Steenbergh and Katherine Ibbett, 219–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, Eric. ‘Liberal Fundamentalism: A Sociology of Wokeness’. American Affairs 4, no. 4 (2020): 188–208. https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/11/liberal-fundamentalism-a-sociology-of-wokeness/
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, James A. Image Ethics in Shakespeare and Spenser. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, Yu Jin, and Michael W. Shurgot, eds. Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and From the Stage. New York: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Langis, Unhae Park. Passion, Prudence, and Virtue in Shakespearean Drama. London: Continuum, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, John. Shakespeare’s Hamlet and the Controverses of the Self. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lehnhof, Kent, Julia Reinhard Lupton, and Carolyn Sale, eds. Shakespeare’s Virtuous Theatre: Power, Capacity and the Good. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, David, and Michael Witmore, eds. Shakespeare and Early Modern Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, Nicholas. ‘Avoidance of Love: Evading Cavell on Dover Cliff’. Modern Philology 117, no. 4 (2020): 445–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/708346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, Nicholas. Shakespearean Arrivals: The Birth of Character. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, Julia Reinhard and Donovan Sherman, eds. Shakespeare and Virtue: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, Herbert. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. New York: Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Martinson, Steven D. Nietzsche’s Early Literary Writings and The Birth of Tragedy. Martlesham: Boydell and Brewer, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Miura, Cassie. ‘Cavell’s Tragic Scepticism and the Comedy of the Cuckold: Othello and Montaigne Revisited’. In Shakespeare and Montaigne, edited by Lars Engle, Patrick Gray and William M. Hamlin, 166–79. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Mousley, Andy. Re-Humanising Shakespeare: Literary Humanism, Wisdom, and Modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Harry, ed. ‘Character Beyond Shakespeare’. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 21, no. 2 (2021).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raspa, Anthony. Shakespeare the Renaissance Humanist: Moral Philosophy and His Plays. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rosendale, Timothy. Theology and Agency in Early Modern Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Kiernan. Shakespearean Tragedy. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Kiernan. Shakespeare’s Universality: Here’s Fine Revolution. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Saarinen, Risto. Weakness of Will in Renaissance and Reformation Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Saval, Peter Kishore. Reading Shakespeare Through Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, Michael. ‘Sorry, Jon Stewart – America Needs Crossfire Again’. Politico, April 7, 2023. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/04/07/bring-back-crossfire-00090842.
   Google Scholar
• Schalkwyk, David. ‘Cavell, Wittgenstein, Shakespeare, and Skepticism: Othello vs. Cymbeline’. Modern Philology 114, no. 3 (2017): 601–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/688259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, William. Arden Shakespeare Third Series Complete Works. Edited by Ann Thompson, David Scott Kastan, H. R. Woudhuysen, and Richard Proudfoot. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, George Bernard. Shaw on Shakespeare. Edited by Edwin Wilson. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Shell, Alison. Shakespeare and Religion. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, Donovan. The Philosopher’s Toothache: Embodied Stoicism in Early Modern English Drama. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Shortslef, Emily. The Drama of Complaint: Ethical Provocations in Shakespeare’s Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• States, Bert O. Hamlet and the Concept of Character. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Stanley. Shakespeare and Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Strier, Richard. ‘Shakespeare Against Morality’. In Reading Renaissance Ethics, edited by Marshall Grossman, 206–25. New York and London: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Strier, Richard. Shakespearean Issues: Agency, Skepticism, and Other Puzzles. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Strier, Richard. The Unrepentant Renaissance: From Petrarch to Shakespeare to Milton. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tilmouth, Christopher. ‘Passion and Intersubjectivity in Early Modern Literature’. In Passions and Subjectivity in Early Modern Culture, edited by Brian Cummings and Freya Sierhuis, 13–33. New York and London: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tilmouth, Christopher. ‘Shakespeare’s Open Consciences’. Renaissance Studies 23, no. 4 (2009): 501–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-4658.2009.00607.x
   Google Scholar
• Wells, Robin Headlam. Shakespeare’s Humanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Yachnin, Paul, and Jessica Slights, eds. Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Zamir, Tzachi. Double Vision: Moral Philosophy and Shakespearean Drama. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar