- Arts D, de Keizer N, Scheffer G J, de Jonge E. Quality of data collected for severity of illness scores in the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) registry. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28(5)656–9
- Bakken I J, Nyland K, Halsteinli V, Kvam U H, Skjeldestad F E. The Norwegian Patient Registry. Nor J Epidemiol. 2004; 14(1)65–9
- Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin L I, Engesæter L B, Vollset S E, Kindseth O. Registration completeness i the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006, Accepted
- Fender D, Harper W M, Gregg P J. The Trent regional arthroplasty study. Experiences with a hip register. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2000; 82(7)944–7
- Froen J F, Lund-Larsen F. Ten years of the Lubinus Interplanta hip prostheses. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1998; 118(18)2767–71
- Garne J P, Aspegren K, Moller T. Validity of breast cancer registration from one hospital into the Swedish National Cancer Registry 1971-1991. Acta Oncol 1995; 34(2)153–6
- Goldberg J, Gelfand H M, Levy P S. Registry evaluation methods: a review and case study. Epidemiol Rev 1980; 2: 210–20
- Gunnarsson U, Seligsohn E, Jestin P, Påhlman L. Registration and validity of surgical complications in colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2003; 90(4)454–9
- Havelin L I. The Norwegian Joint Registry. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1999; 58(3)139–47
- Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie S A, Vollset S E. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(4)337–53
- Knatterud G L, Rockhold F W, George S L, Barton F B, Davis C E, Fairweather W R, Honohan T, Mowery R, O'Neill R. Guidelines for quality assurance in multicenter trials: a position paper. Control Clin Trials 1998; 19(5)477–93
- Pedersen A B, Johnsen S P, Overgaard S, Søballe K, Sørensen H T, Lucht U. Registration in the danish hip arthroplasty registry. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75(4)434–41
- Puolakka T J S, Pajamäki J, Pulkkinen P Nevalainen. Cementless Biomet Total Hip prosthesis in the treatment of osteoarthrosis survivorship analysis, Publications of the national Agency for Medicines 3/1997
- Puolakka T J S, Pajamäki K J J, Halonen P J, Pulkkinen P O, Paavolainen P, Nevalainen J K. The Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72(5)433–41
- Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Knutson K, Lewold, Lidgren L. Validation of the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. A postal survey regarding 30,376 knees operated on between 1975 and 1995. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70(5)467–72
- Sachs M A, Synnerman J E. Quality registries are a goldmine of information that should be better used. Knowledge of improvement is acquired by means of special projects. Lakartidningen 1999; 96(20)2438–40
- Söderman P. On the validity of the results from the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl 296) 2000; 71: 1–33
- Söderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P, Johnell O. Are the findings in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register valid? A comparison between the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register, the National Discharge Register, and the National Death Register. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15(7)884–9
- Sörensen H T, Sabroe S, Olsen J. A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research. Int J Epidemiol 1996; 25(2)435–42
- van der Putten E, van der Velden J W, Siers A, Hamersma E A M. A pilot study on the quality of data management in a cancer clinical trial. Control Clin Trials 1987; 8(2)96–100
- Vantongelen K, Rotmensz N, van der Schueren E. Quality control of validity of data collected in clinical trials. EORTC Study Group on Data Management (SGDM). Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1989; 25(8)1241–7
Acta Orthopaedica
Volume 76, 2005 - Issue 6