Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total hip replacement

References

• Agins H J, Salvati E A, Ranawat C S, Wilson P D, Jr., Pellicci P M. The nine- to fifteen-year follow-up of one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1988; 19(3)517–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldinger P R, Thomsen M, Lukoschek M, Mau H, Ewerbeck V, Breusch S J. Long-term fate of uncemented, threaded acetabular components with smooth surface treatment: minimum 10-year follow-up of two different designs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124(7)469–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman D G. Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. BMJ 1996; 313(7057)570–1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber T C, Healy W L. The hospital cost of total hip arthroplasty. A comparison between 1981 and 1990. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1993; 75(3)321–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berry D J, Harmsen W S, Cabanela M E, Morrey B F. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002; 84-A(2)171–7
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan J J, Templeton J E, Liu S S, Pedersen D R, Goetz D D, Sullivan P M. Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86(4)690–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capello W N. Uncemented total hip replacement. J Japanese Orthop Ass 1990; 64(2)S86
   Google Scholar
• CDC. National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1990–2002. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers For Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics. 2002
   Google Scholar
• Charnley J. Surgery of the hip-joint: present and future developments. Br Med J 1960; 5176: 821–6
   Google Scholar
• Clark C R. Cost containment: total joint implants. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1994; 76(6)799–800
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clohisy J C, Harris W H. Matched-pair analysis of cemented and uncemented acetabular reconstruction in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16(6)697–705
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colditz G A, Burdick E, Mosteller F. Heterogeneity in metaanalysis of data from epidemiologic studies: a commentary. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142(4)371–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D'Lima D D, Oishi C S, Petersilge W J, Colwell C W, Jr., Walker R H. 100 cemented versus 100 noncemented stems with comparison of 25 matched pairs. Clin Orthop 1998, 348: 140–8
   Google Scholar
• Della Valle C J, Berger R A, Shott S, Rosenberg A G, Jacobs J J, Quigley L. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise followup of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86(6)1217–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 31(7109)629–34
   Google Scholar
• Emerson R H, Jr., Head W C, Emerson C B, Rosenfeldt W, Higgins L L. A comparison of cemented and uncemented titanium femoral components used for primary total hip arthroplasty: a radiographic and survivorship study. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17(5)584–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enanoria W T, Ng C, Saha S R, Colford Jr J M. Treatment outcomes after highly active antiretroviral therapy: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Infect Dis 2004; 4(7)414–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fink B, Protzen M, Hansen-Algenstaedt N, Berger J, Ruther W. High migration rate of two types of threaded acetabular cups. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124(1)17–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman M A, Plante-Bordeneuve P. Early migration and late aseptic failure of proximal femoral prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994; 76(3)432–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaffey J L, Callaghan J J, Pedersen D R, Goetz D D, Sullivan P M, Johnston R C. Uncemented acetabular fixation at fifteen years. A comparison with the same surgeon's results following acetabular fixation with cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86(2)257–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godsiff S P, Emery R J, Heywood-Waddington M B, Thomas T L. Cemented versus uncemented femoral components in the ring hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1992; 74(6)822–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goetz D D, Smith E J, Harris W H. The prevalence of femoral osteolysis associated with components inserted with or without cement in total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1994; 76(8)1121–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grant P, Nordsletten L. Total hip arthroplasty with the Lord prosthesis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86(12)2636–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerra E, Traina F, Antonietti B, Giardina F, Toni A. Cemented versus uncemented stem-to-bone fixation: a long-term survival comparison. Chir Organi Mov 2003; 88(3)253–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie S A, Vollset S E. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71β(4)337–53
   Google Scholar
• Howard J L, Hui A J, Bourne R B, McCalden R W, Mac-Donald S J, Rorabeck C H. A quantitative analysis of bone support comparing uncemented tapered and distal fixation total hip replacements. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(3)266–73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jordan R, Gold L, Cummins C, Hyde C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence for increasing numbers of drugs in antiretroviral combination therapy. BMJ 2002; 324(7340)757–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karrholm J, Malchau H, Snorrason F, Herberts P. Micromotion of femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. A randomized study of cemented, hydroxyapatite-coated, and porous-coated stems with roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1994; 76(11)1692–705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y H, Kim J S, Cho S H. Primary total hip arthroplasty with the AML total hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop 1999, 360: 147–58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim Y H, Oh S H, Kim J S, Koo K H. Contemporary total hip arthroplasty with and without cement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003; 85(4)675–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knessl J, Gschwend N, Scheier H, Munzinger U. Comparative study of cemented and uncemented hip prostheses in the same patient. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1989; 108(5)276–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krismer M, Fischer M, Klestil T, Frischhut B. Uncoated polyethylene RM acetabular component versus Muller cemented acetabular component. A 4- to 8-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1991; 110(4)195–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kronick J L, Barba M L, Paprosky W G. Extensively coated femoral components in young patients. Clin Orthop 1997, 344: 263–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kubo T, Inoue S, Maeda T, Arai Y, Hirakawa K, Wu Y. Uncemented Lord total hip arthroplasty: cup loosening common after minimum 10-year follow-up of 103 hips. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72(6)585–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2005; 87(7)1487–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau J, Ioannidis J P, Schmid C H. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127(9)820–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Feeny D, Tugwell P, Wong C. Comparison of total hip arthroplasty performed with and without cement: a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002; 84(10)1823–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lucht U. The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(5)433–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 2) 2002; 84: 2–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney W J. An American implant registry: a clinical use trip wire. Orthopedics 2002; 25(9)923–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maloney W J, Harris W H. Comparison of a hybrid with an uncemented total hip replacement. A retrospective matched-pair study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72(9)1349–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCombe P, Williams S A. A comparison of polyethylene wear rates between cemented and uncemented cups. A prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86(3)344–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendenhall S. 2003 Hip and knee Implant Review. Orthopedic Network 2004; 14(3)1–16
   Google Scholar
• Mjoberg B, Selvik G, Hansson L I, Rosenqvist R, Onnerfalt R. Mechanical loosening of total hip prostheses. A radiographic and roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1986; 68(5)770–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Cook D J, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup D F. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 1999; 354(9193)1896–900, Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Schulz K F, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001a; 285(15)1987–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Schulz K F, Altman D G. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001b; 357(9263)1191–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onsten I, Carlsson A S, Besjakov J. Wear in uncemented porous and cemented polyethylene sockets: a randomised, radiostereometric study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998; 80(2)345–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puolakka R, Pitkanen M T, Rosenberg P H. Comparison of three catheter sets for continuous spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25(6)584–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reigstad A, Rokkum M, Bye K, Brandt M. Femoral remodeling after arthroplasty of the hip. Prospective randomized 5-year comparison of 120 cemented/uncemented cases of arthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64(4)411–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson R P, Lovell T P, Green T M, Bailey G A. Early femoral component loosening in DF-80 total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1989; 4(1)55–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rorabeck C H, Bourne R B, Mulliken B D, Nayak N, Laupacis A, Tugwell P. The Nicolas Andry award: comparative results of cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1996a, 325: 330–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rorabeck C H, Bourne R B, Mulliken B D, Nayak N, Laupacis A, Tugwell P. The Nicolas Andry award: comparative results of cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1996b, 325: 330–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharp S, Sterne J. sbe16.1: New syntax and output for the meta-analysis command. Stat Tech Bull 1998; 42: 6–9
   Google Scholar
• Sinha R K, Dungy D S, Yeon H B. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally porous-coated femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86(6)1254–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroup D F, Berlin J A, Morton S C, Olkin I, Williamson G D, Rennie D. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283(15)2008–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanzer M, Maloney W J, Jasty M, Harris W H. The progression of femoral cortical osteolysis in association with total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1992; 74(3)404–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins G S, Lachiewicz P F, DeMasi R. A prospective study of a titanium femoral component for cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9(6)623–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Volkmann R, Schneider M A, Bretschneider C, Weise K. More failures of uncemented acetabular screw-rings than of cemented polyethylene cups in total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop 1999; 23(3)138–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weidenhielm L R, Mikhail W E, Nelissen R G, Bauer T W. Cemented collarless (Exeter-CPT) versus uncemented collarless (PCA) femoral components. A 2- to 14-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10(5)592–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA 1997; 277(11)925–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wykman A, Olsson E, Axdorph G, Goldie I. Total hip arthroplasty. A comparison between cemented and pressfit noncemented fixation. J Arthroplasty 1991; 6(1)19–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xenos J S, Hopkinson W J, Callaghan J J, Heekin R D, Savory C G. Osteolysis around an uncemented cobalt chrome total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1995, 317: 29–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zicat B, Engh C A, Gokcen E. Patterns of osteolysis around total hip components inserted with and without cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1995; 77(3)432–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman S, Hawkes W G, Hudson J I, Magaziner J, Hebel J R, Towheed T. Outcomes of surgical management of total HIP replacement in patients aged 65 years and older: Cemented versus uncemented femoral components and lateral or anterolateral versus posterior anatomical approach. J Orthop Res 2002; 20(2)182–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar